Skip to main content

Reappropriating, Reconfiguring and Augmenting the Smart City Through Play

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Making Smart Cities More Playable

Part of the book series: Gaming Media and Social Effects ((GMSE))

Abstract

This chapter examines the growing intersection of digital games and the ‘smart city’ model. It explores the various ways that games and playful practices can alternately support, challenge, or counter the push to instrumentalise, optimise, and ‘program’ the city through ubiquitous smart technologies and ‘sentient’ infrastructure. I begin with a brief overview of the smart city model and how digital games figure into its economic and cultural policies. I then examine current debates around how games and play might more broadly contribute to and counteract the smart city approach, through an analysis of different groups and movements that propose themselves as playful ‘alternatives’ to the smart city. I outline three broad conceptual categories into which these alternatives fit, which alternately propose to reappropriate, reconfigure, and augment the smart city. In doing so, I connecting each of these approaches not only to contemporary discourses around urban policy, but also historical and present visions of play in urban space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alizadeh T (2017) An investigation of IBM’s smarter cities challenge: what do participating cities want? Cities 63:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amin A (2014) The machinery of urban resilience. Soc Sci 3(3):308–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ampatzidou C, Bouw M, van de Klundert F, de Lange M, de Waal M (2015) The Hackable City: a research manifesto and design toolkit. Amsterdam Creative Industries Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Apperley T, Dieter M (2010) Editorial: special issue on counterplay. Fibreculture J 16. http://web.archive.org/web/20190101131742http://sixteen.fibreculturejournal.org

  5. Apprich C (2017) Babylonian dreams: from info-cities to smart cities to experimental collectivism. Fibreculture J 29. http://web.archive.org/web/20180602050955http://twentynine.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-213-babylonian-dreams-from-info-cities-to-smart-cities-to-experimental-collectivism/

  6. Arup (n.d.) Cities alive. http://web.archive.org/web/20190531041835https://www.arup.com/perspectives/cities-alive

  7. Baggini J (2014) Playable cities: the city that plays together, stays together. The Guardian. https://web.archive.org/web/20190122170634/https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/sep/04/playable-cities-the-city-that-plays-together-stays-together

  8. Beta Blocks (n.d.) Beta blocks. https://betablocks.city/

  9. Bulkeley H, McGuirk PM, Dowling R (2016) Making a smart city for the smart grid? Env Plann A 48(9):1709–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caillois R (1958) Man, play and games (trans: Barash M). University of Illinois Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caird SP, Hallett SH (2019) Towards evaluation design for smart city development. J Urban Des 24(2):188–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheung R (2018) Smart cities: are we sleepwalking into a big brother future of constant surveillance? South China Morning Post. https://web.archive.org/web/20190502211114/https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/article/2159810/smart-cities-are-we-sleepwalking-big-brother-future-constant-surveillance

  13. City of Boston (n.d.) New urban mechanics. https://web.archive.org/web/20190531140914/https://www.boston.gov/departments/new-urban-mechanics

  14. Crowley M, Nutter M, Wheeler C, Schuetz N, Lamberg R, Bent E (2016) Smart cities for sustainability: a sector-by-sector tech review. US Urban Solutions, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Lange M (2015) The playful city: using play and games to foster citizen participation. In: Skaržauskienė A (ed) Social technologies and collective intelligence. Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, pp 426–434

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Peuter G, Dyer-Witheford N (2005) A playful multitude? Mobilising and counter-mobilising immaterial game labour. Fibreculture J 5. https://web.archive.org/web/20190416185726/http://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-024-a-playful-multitude-mobilising-and-counter-mobilising-immaterial-game-labour/

  17. De Souza e Silva A, Hjorth L (2009) Playful urban spaces: a historical approach to mobile games. Simul Gaming 40(5):602–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Waal M, de Lange M, Bouw M (2018) The hackable city: a model for collaborative citymaking. The Hackable City, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  19. Debord G (2006/1955) Introduction to a critique of urban geography. In: Knabb K (ed) Situationist international anthology. Bureau of Public Secrets, Berkeley, pp 8–11

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dyer-Witheford N, de Peuter G (2009) Games of empire: global capitalism and video games. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  21. Engagement Lab (n.d.) Smart cities. https://elab.emerson.edu/initiatives/smart-cities

  22. Flanagan M (2009) Critical play: radical game design. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuchs M, Fizek S, Ruffino P, Schrape N (2014) Introduction. In: Gamification Rethinking (ed) Fuchs, fizek, ruffino & schrape. Meson Press, Lüneburg, pp 7–17

    Google Scholar 

  24. Galloway A (2006) Gaming: essays on algorithmic culture. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gabrys J (2016) Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Gendering the Smart City (n.d.) About the project. http://web.archive.org/web/20190303035855/https://gendersmartcity.com/

  27. Glas R, Lammes S, de Lange M, Raessens J, de Vries I (eds) (2015) The playful citizen: citizen engagement in a mediatized culture. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gordon E (2019) Meaningful inefficiencies: democracy and public value in the smart city. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gordon E, Baldwin-Philippi J (2014) Playful civic learning: enabling reflection and lateral trust in game-based public participation. Int J Commun 8:759–786

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gordon E, Walter S (2016) Meaningful inefficiencies: resisting the logic of technological efficiency in the design of civic systems. In Gordon E, Mihailidis P (eds) Civic media: technology, design, practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 243–266

    Google Scholar 

  31. Green B (2019) The smart enough city: putting technology in its place to reclaim our urban future. MIT Press, Cambridge (open access)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Greenfield A (2013) Against the smart city. Do Projects, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hall P (2000) The centenary of modern planning. In: Freestone R (ed) Urban planning in a changing world: the twentieth century experience. Routledge, Milton Park, pp 20–39

    Google Scholar 

  34. Harris I (2018) Supercell and playerunknown respond to Elon Musk’s callout for tesla game devs. Pocket Gamer.biz. https://web.archive.org/web/20190531143319/https://www.pocketgamer.biz/news/68707/supercell-and-playerunknown-respond-to-elon-musks-twitter-callout-for-tesla-game-devs/

  35. Hollands RG (2015) Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 8(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hopkins R (2018) Hilary O’Shaughnessy on the playable city. Rob Hopkins.net. https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.robhopkins.net/2018/07/23/hilary-oshaughnessy-on-the-playable-city/

  37. Hughes R (2017) A playful city—turning Dublin into Ireland’s first city of play. RTE. https://web.archive.org/web/20190531152513/https://www.rte.ie/eile/tech/2017/1011/911587-a-playful-city-making-dublin-into-irelands-first-city-of-play/

  38. Huizinga J (1938) Homo ludens: a study of the play-element in culture (trans: unknown). Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  39. Innocent T (2017) Bringing back an old idea for smart cities—playing on the street. The Conversation. https://web.archive.org/web/20190526204636/http://theconversation.com/bringing-back-an-old-idea-for-smart-cities-playing-on-the-street-85756

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jacobs J (2011/1961) The death and life of great american cities. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kerr A (2017) Global games: production, circulation and policy in the networked era. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Kitchin R (2014) The real-time city? big data and smart urbanism. Geo J 79:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kitchin R, Maalsen S, McArdle G (2016) The praxis and politics of urban dashboards. Geoforum 77:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kompan (n.d.) Smart playground. https://web.archive.org/web/20190531143427/https://www.kompan.us/smart-playground

  45. Korsgaard H, Brynskov M (2014) City bug report: urban prototyping as participatory process and practice. MAB’14 proceedings of the 2nd media architecture biennale conference. World Cities, pp 21–29

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kücklich J (2005) Precarious playbour: modders and the digital games industry. Fibreculture J 5. https://web.archive.org/web/20181229160300/http://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-025-precarious-playbour-modders-and-the-digital-games-industry/

  47. Lacey H (2014) Discover the playable city. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/hesterlacey/2014/08/26/discover-the-playable-city-the-happy-face-of-the-urban-environment/#6e303b9a7600

  48. Lefebvre H (1996) The right to the city. In: Kofman E, Lebas E (eds and trans) Writings on cities. Blackwell, Malden, pp 61–182

    Google Scholar 

  49. Leorke D (2018) Location-based gaming: play in public space. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  50. Leorke D, Wyatt D (2018) Public libraries in the smart city. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lerner JB (2014) Making democracy fun: how game design can empower citizens and transform politics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Lütticken S (2010) Playtimes. New Left Rev 66:125–140

    Google Scholar 

  53. Malik K (2019) As surveillance culture grows, can we even hope to escape its grasp? The Guardian. http://web.archive.org/web/20190529211409/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/19/as-surveillance-culture-grows-can-we-even-hope-to-escape-its-reach

  54. Mattern S (2016) Instrumental city: the view from hudson yards. Places J. http://web.archive.org/web/20190402204424/https://placesjournal.org/article/instrumental-city-new-york-hudson-yards/?cn-reloaded=1

  55. McWhertor M (2019) Pokémon company reveals pokémon sleep, a game about sleeping. Polygon. https://web.archive.org/web/20190529071243/https://www.polygon.com/2019/5/28/18643531/pokemon-sleep-tracker-pokemon-go-niantic-nintendo

  56. Nijholt A (ed) (2017) Playable cities: the city as a digital playground. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nijholt A (2017) Towards playful and playable cities. In: Nijholt A (ed) Playable cities: the city as a digital playground. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Nijholt A (2017) Mischief humour in smart and playable cities. In Nijholt A (ed) Playable cities: the city as a digital playground. Singapore, Springer, pp 235–253

    Google Scholar 

  59. Onyango G (2018) Konza technocity project derailed by scandal, funding and legislation. Dhahabu Kenya. https://web.archive.org/web/20180815093101/http://www.dhahabu.co.ke/2018/03/07/konza-city-project-derailed/

  60. Picon A (2015) Smart cities: a spatialised intelligence. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. Play the City (n.d.) About us. https://web.archive.org/web/20190523130658/https://www.playthecity.nl/page/411/about-us

  62. Playable City (n.d.) Vision. https://web.archive.org/web/20190402214516/https://www.playablecity.com/vision/

  63. Playable City (n.d.) Cities. https://web.archive.org/web/20190531131215/https://www.playablecity.com/cities/

  64. Playful City (n.d.) About the Playful City Group. https://web.archive.org/web/20190523130842/https://playfulcity.net/go/

  65. Poon L (2018) Sleepy in Songdo, Korea’s smartest city. CityLab. https://web.archive.org/web/20190529202329/https://www.citylab.com/life/2018/06/sleepy-in-songdo-koreas-smartest-city/561374/

  66. Ruffino P (2018) Future gaming: creative interventions in video game culture. Goldsmiths Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  67. Saunders T, Baeck P (2015) Rethinking smart cities from the ground up. Nesta, London. http://web.archive.org/web/20190531041806/https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/rethinking_smart_cities_from_the_ground_up_2015.pdf

  68. Shepard M (2014) Beyond the smart city. Harv Des Mag 37 (Winter)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Smart Tampere (2018) Agile experiments help create useful urban services. http://web.archive.org/web/20190531041622/https://smarttampere.fi/en/agile-experiments-help-create-useful-urban-services/

  70. STARTS Prize (n.d.) Making sense—citizen sensing toolkit. http://web.archive.org/web/20190531041710/https://starts-prize.aec.at/en/making-sense-citizen-sensing-toolkit/

  71. Stengers I (2005) The cosmopolitical proposal. In: Latour B, Weibel P (eds) Making things public: atmospheres of democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 994–1003

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sterling B (2018) Stop saying “smart cities”. The Atlantic. http://web.archive.org/web/20181216062357/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/02/stupid-cities/553052/

  73. Stevens Q (2017) Play. In: Jayne M, Wood K (eds) Urban theory: new critical perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 177–186

    Google Scholar 

  74. Stevens Q (2007) The ludic city. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  75. Streetlife (n.d.) Homepage. https://web.archive.org/web/20170317072104/http://www.streetlife-project.eu/index.html

  76. Tan E (2017) Play the city: games informing the urban development. Japsam Books, Heijningen

    Google Scholar 

  77. The Medical Futurist (2017) Peek into the future of hospitals: smart design, technologies and our home. https://medicalfuturist.com/peek-into-the-future-of-hospitals

  78. The Urban Conga (n.d.) Our story. https://web.archive.org/web/20190531152855/http://www.theurbanconga.com/our-story

  79. Townsend A (2013) Smart cities: big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W.W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  80. Trencher G (2019) Towards the smart city 2.0: empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 143:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. van den Bosch H. (2018) Smart beyond technology push. Smart City Hub. https://web.archive.org/web/20190526180655/http://smartcityhub.com/technology-innnovation/smart-beyond-technology-push/

  82. Wark M (2008) 50 years of recuperation of the situationist international. Princeton University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wark M (2007) Gamer theory. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Book  Google Scholar 

  84. Wattenbarger M (2018) The Mexican town that refused to become a smart city. The Guardian. http://web.archive.org/web/20190521061123/https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/oct/16/the-mexican-town-that-refused-to-become-a-smart-city

  85. Zica MR, Ionica AC, Leba M (2018) Gamification in the context of smart cities. In: IOP Conference on Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol 294. https://web.archive.org/web/20190531142951/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/294/1/012045/pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my colleagues from the Tampere University Games Seminar for their detailed and helpful feedback on an earlier version of this paper; and Jan Švelch for his comments and corrections on this version, although all mistakes and oversights are of course my own.

I use Web Archive where possible to capture online references as they appear at the time of writing. Use the full link provided to see the version I am quoting from, or the link within the link to view current and non-archived versions of them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dale Leorke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leorke, D. (2020). Reappropriating, Reconfiguring and Augmenting the Smart City Through Play. In: Nijholt, A. (eds) Making Smart Cities More Playable. Gaming Media and Social Effects. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9765-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics