Abstract
This chapter concentrates on offering the overview of research on Western faculty development from historical, theoretical, and practical perspectives. Specifically, historical review of Western faculty development research involves examining the academic research ability, teaching ability, and social service ability of faculty at universities and colleges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References (in Chinese)
Be, D., & Li, J. (2014). Nature and function of the University Teacher Development Center [J]. Fudan Education Forum, 12(04), 41-47.
Cai, Y. (2018). On professional academy and teaching academy in the development of university teachers [J]. Teacher Education Research, 30(02), 27–31.
Chen, S., & Wang, H. Research on the psychological resilience structure and influencing factors of young teachers in colleges and universities.
Chen, Z., & Zhu, D. (2018). Research on the development of university teachers: Status quo, problems and prospects [J]. Education Exploration, (01), 1–7.
He, Z., & Wang, R. University teaching culture and teacher development ecology [J]. Higher Education Research, 36(01), 57–61.
He, X., Meng, T., Lou, L., & Jia, L. (2015). Investigation and research on mental health status of young teachers in colleges and universities: A case study of 25 universities in Zhejiang province [J]. Educational Review, 11, 114–117.
Ji, F. (2016). Retrospect and discussion on the development of university teachers in China [J]. Education Review, (02), 118–121.
Jiang, Y., & Lin, J. (2011). The idea and practice of teacher development in Japanese Universities: A case study of Kyoto University [J]. Peking University Education Review, 9(03), 29–44 + 188–189.
Li, X. (2013). Institutional logic and theoretical connotation of the construction of teacher development center in colleges and universities [J]. China Higher Education Research, (12), 69–72.
Li, X. (2018). The American model of the development of university teachers and its reference significance [J]. Jiangsu Higher Education, (01), 52–56.
Lin, J., & Li, L. (2007). Three theoretical models of teacher development in American Universities [J]. Modern University Education, (01), 62–66 + 111–112.
Lin, J., & Wei, H. (2016). The international trend of university teacher development [J]. University Education Management, 10(01), 86–91.
Lin, J., & Wei, H. (2018). Competency model for teacher development workers at North American University [J]. College Education Management, 12(01), 92–98.
Liu, Z. (2018). The reform of teacher development organization in American research universities from the perspective of governance: Path and reference [J]. Modern Education Management (03), 58–63.
Liu, J., & Wang, Z. (2011). The experience and enlightenment of American university teacher development [J]. Education Research, 32(11), 104–107.
Lu, D. (2014). Research and enlightenment of teacher professional development in Stanford University [J]. China Higher Education Research, (03), 48–54.
Pan, M. (2015). The quality of higher education and the development of university teachers [J]. Higher Education Research, 36 (01), 48.
Pan, M. (2017). Outline of university teacher development—Idea, connotation, mode, organization and motivation [J]. Higher Education Research, 38(01), 62–65.
Pang, H. (2012). Research on the function and operation mechanism of the University Teacher Development Center [J]. Journal of the National Institute of Education Administration (08), 60–65 + 33.
Qin, G. (2012). The history and enlightenment of teacher development in American Universities [C]//Annual Meeting of the Comparative Education Branch of the Chinese Education Association.
Qu, L. (2018). The generation environment, establishment process and organizational characteristics of the teacher development center of the University of Michigan [J]. China Higher Education Research, (01), 75–80 + 86.
Shen, H. (2016). The development of university teachers in China-based on the analysis of the “2014 China University Teachers Survey” [J]. Higher Education Research, 37(02), 37–46.
Wang, C. (2009). Attribution of teachers’ professionalization in American Universities and its enlightenment to China [J]. Higher Education Research, (2), 11–11.
Wu, W., & Chen, C. (2014). The characteristics and enlightenment of the faculty development center of british universities: A case study of University of London, Royal College of London and Oxford University [J]. Exploration of Higher Education, (03), 53–57 + 64.
Zhang, X. (2014). Mental health problems and countermeasures of young teachers in universities in China [J]. Education Review, (04), 44–47.
Zheng, X. (2014) Analysis and improvement strategy of young college teachers’ psychological quality [J]. Education Review, (12), 47–49.
Zhou, G., & Ma, H. (2013). Teaching academic competence: A new framework for the development and evaluation of university teachers [J]. Educational Research, 34(08), 37–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhu, X., Li, J. (2019). Historical, Theoretical, and Practical Dimensions on Faculty Development Research. In: Faculty Development in Chinese Higher Education. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7767-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7767-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7766-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7767-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)