Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Developmentalism to Neoliberalism
  • 375 Accesses

Abstract

The conclusion synthesizes the discussion in previous chapters. Using the experiences of Brazil and India, this chapter reassesses the relationship between neoliberalism, growth and human development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example Amin (1987) and Patnaik (2017) for a Marxist perspective on this. See Song (2011, 2013) for a critique of the literature on developmentalism.

  2. 2.

    See Storm and Mohan Rao (2004) for an insightful discussion.

  3. 3.

    There is by now a vast literature that has attempted to analyse Locke’s justifications of colonialism, see Lebovics (1986), Arnell (1994) and Farr (2008).

References

  • Ambedkar, B. R. (2015 [1936]). Annihilation of Caste: The Annotated Critical Edition. New Delhi: Navayana Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambedkar, B. R. (2014 [1932]). On Village Panchayats Bill: 1, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches: vol. 2. Dr. Ambedkar Foundation, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Goverment of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (1987). A Note on the Concept of Delinking. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 10(3), 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnell, B. (1994). Trade, Plantations, and Property: John Locke and the Economic Defense of Colonialism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 55(4), 591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, G. (1999). The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzellini, D. (2010). Constituent Power in Motion: Ten Years of Transformation in Venezuela. Socialism and Democracy, 24(2), 8–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzellini, D. (2016). Constituent and Constituted Power: Reading Social Transformation in Latin America. In E. Betances, & C. Figueroa Ibarra (Eds.), Popular Sovereignty and Constituent Power in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, W. (2013). Capitalism’s Last Stand? Deglobalization in the Age of Austerity. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., & Panagariya, A. (2013). Why Growth Matters: How Economic Growth in India Reduced Poverty and the Lessons for Other Developing Countries. London: Hachette UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruera, H. F. G. (2012). The Governability Dilemma: Progressive Politics Under Lula and the Brazilian Workers’ Party. PhD Thesis, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (2010). Bonfire of Illusions: The Twin Crises of the Liberal World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H-J. (2003a). Kicking Away the Ladder: Infant Industry Promotion in Historical Perspective. Oxford Development Studies, 31(1), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H-J. (2003b). Only Protection Can Build Developing Economies. Global Policy Forum. Available at: https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/162/27898.html.

  • Demmer, J. (2004). Global Neoliberalisation and Violent Conflict. In J. Demmer, Alex E. Fernández Jilberto, & Barbara Hogenboom (Eds.), Good Governance in the Era of Global Neoliberalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmer, J., Jilberto, A. E. F., & Hogenboom, B. (2004). Good Governance and Democracy in a World of Neoliberal Regimes. In J. Demmer, Alex E. Fernández Jilberto, & Barbara Hogenboom (Eds.), Good Governance in the Era of Global Neoliberalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J. (2008). Locke, Natural Law, and New World Slavery. Political Theory, 36(4), 495–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B., & Clark, B. (2009). The Paradox of Wealth: Capitalism and Ecological Destruction. Monthly Review, 61(6), 1–18. Available at: https://monthlyreview.org/2009/11/01/the-paradox-of-wealth-capitalism-and-ecological-destruction/ [Accessed 5 October 2018].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Linera, Al. (2007). Neo-Liberalism and the New Socialism. Speech Presented at the First Gathering of Peoples and States for the Liberation of the Patria Grande in Sucre. Retrieved from January 9, 2018. http://www.politicalaffairs.net/neo-liberalism-and-the-new-socialism-speech-by-alvaro-garcia-linera.

  • Gramsci, A. (2000). A Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings, 1916–1935, ed. David Forgacs. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 22–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2002). Change the World Without Taking Power. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. (1933). National Self-Sufficiency. Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, 22(86), 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. R., & Christiansen, J. (Eds.). (2010). Towards new developmentalism: Market as Means Rather Than Master. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. (2009). Nationalist Versus Dependent Capitalist Development: Alternate Pathways of Asia and Latin America in a Globalized World. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(4), 386–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konings, P (2004). Good Governance, Privatisation and Ethno-Regional Conflict in Cameroon. In J. Demmer, Alex E. Fernández Jilberto, & Barbara Hogenboom (Eds.), Good Governance in the Era of Global Neoliberalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebovics, H. (1986). The Uses of America in Locke’s Second Treatise of Government. Journal of the History of Ideas, 47(4), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebowitz, M. (2006). Build It Now: Socialism for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1947). Two Treatises of Government. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitra, K. (2012). Ambedkar and the Constitution of India: A Deweyan Experiment. Contemporary Pragmatism, 9(2), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mkandawire, T. (2004). Disempowering New Democracies and the Persistence of Poverty. In M. Spoor (Eds.), Globalisation, Poverty and Conflict. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neocleous, M. (2011). War on Waste: Law, Original Accumulation and the Violence of Capital. Science & Society, 75(4), 506–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivecrona, K. (1974). Appropriation in the State of Nature: Locke on the Origin of Property. Journal of the History of Ideas, 35(2), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, J. D., Prakash, L., & Furceri, D. (2016). Neoliberalism: Oversold? Finance & Development, 53(2), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, P. (2014). The Liberation of Politics. Telegraph, March 11. Available at: https://www.telegraphindia.com/1140311/jsp/opinion/story_18059123.jsp#.WOIcHaIlHwo.

  • Patnaik, P. (2017). The October Revolution and the Survival of Capitalism. Monthly Review, 69(3). Available at: https://monthlyreview.org/2017/07/01/the-october-revolution-and-the-survival-of-capitalism/ [Accessed 24 May 2018].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, B. (2016). Elite Development Theory: A Labour-Centred Critique. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 781–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, H. Y. (2011). Theorising the Korean State Beyond Institutionalism: Class Content and Form of ‘National’ Development. New Political Economy, 16(3), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, H. Y. (2013). Marxist Critiques of the Developmental State and the Fetishism of National Development. Antipode, 45(5), 1254–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stédile, J. P. (2015). Precisamos de uma frente com um projeto alternative ao da burguesia. Interview in Carta Capital. Available at: http://www.cartacapital.com.br/sociedade/precisamos-de-uma-frente-com-um-projeto-alternativo-ao-da-burguesia-9932.html [Accessed 4 June 2018].

  • Storm, S., & Mohan Rao, J. (2004). Market‐Led Globalization and World Democracy: Can the Twain Ever Meet? Development and Change, 35(3), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (2003). What Strategies Are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of ‘Development Space’. Review of International Political Economy, 10(4), 621–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (2017). Is Trump Wrong About Trade? A Partial Defense, Based on Production and Employment. Real-World Economics Review, (79), 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (1993). Democracy and the “Washington Consensus”. World Development, 21(8), 1329–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul A. Sirohi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sirohi, R.A. (2019). Conclusion. In: From Developmentalism to Neoliberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6028-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6028-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6027-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6028-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics