Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Research into Design for a Connected World pp 189–199Cite as

Conceptual Intermediate Structures for Interaction Design in Complex Safety-Critical Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

  • 1482 Accesses

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 134))

Abstract

What are generic processes by which theories of cognitive and social sciences provide interaction design input for complex safety-critical systems? In this article, we identify the need for intervening cognitive structures in the form of conceptual-based abstract frameworks that translate the insights from human studies to the design of human technology interaction in safety-critical systems. Using examples of two human systems design frameworks, cognitive work analysis and core task analysis, the aim will be to draw generic implications for these intervening conceptual-based translational structures linking cognitive and social sciences to complex safety-critical interaction design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gaver, W.: Science and design: the implications of different forms of accountability. In: Olson, J.S., Kellogg, W.A. (eds.) Ways of Knowing in HCI, pp. 143–165. Springer, New York (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Norros, L.: Developing human factors/ergonomics as a design discipline. Appl. Ergon. 45, 61–71 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robertson, J., Robertson, S.: Mastering the requirements process. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Höök, K., Löwgren, J.: Strong concepts: intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 19, 23 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghemraoui, R., Mathieu, L., Tricot, N.: Design method for systematic safety integration. CIRP Ann. 58, 161–164 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadeghi, L., Mathieu, L., Tricot, N., Al Bassit, L., Ghemraoui, R.: Toward design for safety part 1: functional reverse engineering driven by axiomatic design. Presented at the International Conference on Axiomatic Design, 7th ICAD (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sadeghi, L., Mathieu, L., Tricot, N., Al Bassit, L., Ghemraoui, R.: Toward design for safety part 2: functional re-engineering using axiomatic design and FMEA. Presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Axiomatic Design, ICAD (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bardzell, J., Bolter, J., Löwgren, J.: Interaction criticism: three readings of an interaction design, and what they get us. Interactions 17, 32–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lidwell, W., Holden, K., Butler, J.: Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Pub (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Löwgren, J.: Toward an articulation of interaction esthetics. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 15, 129–146 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaver, B., Bowers, J.: Annotated portfolios. Interactions 19, 40–49 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. CRC-Press, Boca Raton (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rasmussen, J., Goodstein, L.P., Pejtersen, A.M.: Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rasmussen, J.: On the structure of knowledge—a morphology of metal models in a man-machine system context. Risø National Laboratory ER (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dal Vernon, C.R., Sanderson, P.M.: Work domain analysis and sensors II: Pasteurizer II case study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 56, 597–637 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burns, C.M., Kuo, J., Ng, S.: Ecological interface design: a new approach for visualizing network management. Comput. Netw. 43, 369–388 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Amelink, M.H., Van Paassen, M.M., Mulder, M., Flach, J.M.: Total energy-based perspective flight path display for aircraft guidance along complex approach trajectories. Presented at the Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Norros, L.: Acting under uncertainty: the core-task analysis in ecological study of work. VTT Espoo (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Norros, L., Savioja, P., Koskinen, H.: Core-task design: a practice-theory approach to human factors. Synth. Lect. Hum. Centered Inform. 8, 1–141 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wahlström, M., Karvonen, H., Norros, L., Jokinen, J., Koskinen, H.: Radical innovation by theoretical abstraction—a challenge for the user-centred designer. Des. J. 19, 857–877 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wahlström, M., Karvonen, H., Kaasinen, E., Mannonen, P.: Designing user-oriented future ship bridges–an approach for radical concept design. Ergonomics in Design: Methods and Techniques, pp. 217–231 (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Woods, D.D.: Cognitive technologies: the design of joint human-machine cognitive systems. AI Mag. 6, 86 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Woods, D.D., Hollnagel, E.: Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stolterman, E., Wiberg, M.: Concept-driven interaction design research. Hum. Comput. Interact. 25, 95–118 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stolterman, E., Pierce, J.: Design tools in practice: studying the designer-tool relationship in interaction design. Presented at the Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, New York, NY, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stolterman, E.: The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. Int. J. Des. 2 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IDC School of Design, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400076, India

    Vivek Kant

  2. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Espoo, 02044, Finland

    Mikael Wahlström

Authors
  1. Vivek Kant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mikael Wahlström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Kant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India

    Amaresh Chakrabarti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kant, V., Wahlström, M. (2019). Conceptual Intermediate Structures for Interaction Design in Complex Safety-Critical Systems. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Research into Design for a Connected World. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 134. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5974-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5973-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5974-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation