Skip to main content

Hodgkin-Huxley Model Indicates an Inversion in the Strength-Duration Curves for Mono and Biphasic Stimuli

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 70/1))

  • 1403 Accesses

Abstract

Action potentials are non-linear variations of the transmembrane potential caused by changes in the membrane conductance. In 1952, Hodgkin and Huxley proposed a set of differential equations that describes mathematically the conductance changes observed during the course of an action potential. Currently, this model is still a good tool for understanding the basic mechanisms involved in the initiation and propagation of the action potentials. The objective of this work was to use a simple application of the Hodgkin-Huxley model to define the relation between the stimulation threshold and variations of the stimulatory waveform, in order to promote cell excitation delivering the lowest energy stimulus. We evaluated the strength-duration curves for mono and biphasic stimuli, giving special attention to short stimuli. This Hodgkin-Huxley implementation allowed the explanation of the mechanisms underlining a curious inversion of the strength-duration curves for mono and biphasic stimuli. Namely, for shorter stimuli (<2.2 ms), the stimulation threshold for monophasic stimuli becomes smaller than for biphasic stimuli. That inversion seems to be a result of the time-dependence of the activation variables of Na+ and K+ channels and the inactivation variable of Na+ channels proposed in the Hodgkin-Huxley model. In addition, we used the model to evaluate the energy of asymmetrical biphasic stimuli in order to find a more energy-efficient waveform, which was shown to be a combination of a 7 ms long hyperpolarizing phase with a depolarizing phase of 6 ms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weiss, T.F.: Cellular Biophysics: Electrical Properties, vol. 2. A Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hodgkin, A.L., Huxley, A.F.: A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 117, 500–554 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brocker, D.T., Grill, W.M.: Principles of electrical stimulation of neural tissue. In: Lozano, A.M., Hallett, M. (eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 116 (3rd series) Brain Stimulation, pp. 3–18. Elsevier, New York, NY (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kavanagh, K.M., Duff, H.J., Clark, R., Robinson, K.V., Giles, W.R., Wyse, D.G.: Monophasic versus biphasic cardiac stimulation: mechanism of decreased energy requirements. PACE 13, 1268–1276 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo, C., Rudy, Y.: A model of the ventricular cardiac electrical potential. Circ. Res. 68(6), 1501–1526 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tung, R., Borderies, J.-R.: Analysis of electric field stimulation of single cardiac muscle cells. Biophys. J. 63, 371–386 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boinagrov, D., Loudin, J., Palanker, D.: Strength–duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 2236–2248 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by CNPq (408617/2017-9 scholarship to JTG) and CAPES (scholarship to MZ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Xavier de Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Oliveira, P.X., Goulart, J.T., Zoccoler, M. (2019). Hodgkin-Huxley Model Indicates an Inversion in the Strength-Duration Curves for Mono and Biphasic Stimuli. In: Costa-Felix, R., Machado, J., Alvarenga, A. (eds) XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 70/1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2119-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2119-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2118-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2119-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics