Abstract
Action potentials are non-linear variations of the transmembrane potential caused by changes in the membrane conductance. In 1952, Hodgkin and Huxley proposed a set of differential equations that describes mathematically the conductance changes observed during the course of an action potential. Currently, this model is still a good tool for understanding the basic mechanisms involved in the initiation and propagation of the action potentials. The objective of this work was to use a simple application of the Hodgkin-Huxley model to define the relation between the stimulation threshold and variations of the stimulatory waveform, in order to promote cell excitation delivering the lowest energy stimulus. We evaluated the strength-duration curves for mono and biphasic stimuli, giving special attention to short stimuli. This Hodgkin-Huxley implementation allowed the explanation of the mechanisms underlining a curious inversion of the strength-duration curves for mono and biphasic stimuli. Namely, for shorter stimuli (<2.2 ms), the stimulation threshold for monophasic stimuli becomes smaller than for biphasic stimuli. That inversion seems to be a result of the time-dependence of the activation variables of Na+ and K+ channels and the inactivation variable of Na+ channels proposed in the Hodgkin-Huxley model. In addition, we used the model to evaluate the energy of asymmetrical biphasic stimuli in order to find a more energy-efficient waveform, which was shown to be a combination of a 7 ms long hyperpolarizing phase with a depolarizing phase of 6 ms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Weiss, T.F.: Cellular Biophysics: Electrical Properties, vol. 2. A Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA (1997)
Hodgkin, A.L., Huxley, A.F.: A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 117, 500–554 (1952)
Brocker, D.T., Grill, W.M.: Principles of electrical stimulation of neural tissue. In: Lozano, A.M., Hallett, M. (eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 116 (3rd series) Brain Stimulation, pp. 3–18. Elsevier, New York, NY (2013)
Kavanagh, K.M., Duff, H.J., Clark, R., Robinson, K.V., Giles, W.R., Wyse, D.G.: Monophasic versus biphasic cardiac stimulation: mechanism of decreased energy requirements. PACE 13, 1268–1276 (1999)
Luo, C., Rudy, Y.: A model of the ventricular cardiac electrical potential. Circ. Res. 68(6), 1501–1526 (1991)
Tung, R., Borderies, J.-R.: Analysis of electric field stimulation of single cardiac muscle cells. Biophys. J. 63, 371–386 (1992)
Boinagrov, D., Loudin, J., Palanker, D.: Strength–duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 2236–2248 (2010)
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by CNPq (408617/2017-9 scholarship to JTG) and CAPES (scholarship to MZ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
de Oliveira, P.X., Goulart, J.T., Zoccoler, M. (2019). Hodgkin-Huxley Model Indicates an Inversion in the Strength-Duration Curves for Mono and Biphasic Stimuli. In: Costa-Felix, R., Machado, J., Alvarenga, A. (eds) XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 70/1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2119-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2119-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2118-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2119-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)