Skip to main content
  • 400 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the purpose and main content of this book. It also presents the general idea behind using partial identification or bounds in econometrics. It ends with the organization of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The marginal treatment effect parameter bridges the gap between structural models and treatment effects.

  2. 2.

    Point identfication means that we can theoretically learn the true parameter value in infinite samples. Intuitively, it implies that we can provide a single-valued estimate of our parameter of interest.

  3. 3.

    Partial identification approaches are also used in other fields of economics, for example, game theory and auction models (see, e.g., Tamer 2010; Ho and Rosen 2015).

  4. 4.

    For reviews on inference for partially identified models see, for example, Tamer (2010) and Canay and Shaikh (2017).

References

  • Angrist J, Imbens G, Rubin D (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc 91:444–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist J, Fernandez-Val I (2010) ExtrapoLATE-ing: external validity and overidentification in the \(LATE\) framework. Working Paper 16566, NBER

    Google Scholar 

  • Balke A, Pearl J (1997) Bounds on treatment effects from studies with imperfect compliance. J Am Stat Assoc 92(439):1171–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canay I, Shaikh A (2017) Practical and theoretical advances for inference in partially identified models. In: Honoré B, Pakes A, Piazzesi M, Samuelson L (eds) Advances in economics and econometrics, eleventh world congress, vol 2. Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge University Press, pp 271–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro P, Heckman J, Vytlacil E (2010) Evaluating marginal policy changes and the average effect of treatment for individuals at the margin. Econometrica 78:377–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro P, Heckman J, Vytlacil E (2011) Estimating marginal returns to education. Am Econ Rev 101:2754–2781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Flores C, Flores-Lagunes A (2018) Going beyond LATE: bounding average treatment effects of Job Corps training. J Human Resour 53(4):1050–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernozhukov V, Hong H, Tamer E (2007) Estimation and confidence regions for parameter sets in econometric models. Econometrica 75(5):1243–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernozhukov V, Lee S, Rosen A (2013) Intersection bounds: estimation and inference. Econometrica 81:667–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A (2010) Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. J Econ Lit 48:424–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen C, Kreider B, Pepper J (2012) The impact of the National School Lunch Program on child health: a nonparametric bounds analysis. J Econom 166:79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (1996) On air: identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc 91:459–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (2010) Building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy. J Econ Lit Am Econ Assoc 48(2):356–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, Vytlacil E (1999) Local instrumental variables and latent variable models for identifying and bounding treatment effects. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 96:4730–4734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, Vytlacil E (2000) Instrumental variables, selection models, and tight bounds on the average treatment effect. Technical Working Paper 259, NBER

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, Vytlacil E (2005) Structural equations, treatment effects, and econometric policy evaluation. Econometrica 73(3):669–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, Urzua S (2010) Comparing IV with structural models: what simple IV can and cannot Identify. J Econom 156(1):27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano K, Porter J (2012) Impossibility results for nondifferentiable functionals. Econometrica 80(4):1769–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho K, Rosen A (2015) Partial identification in applied research: benefits and challenges. Working Paper 21641, NBER

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber M, Laffers L, Mellace G (2017) Sharp IV bounds on average treatment effects on the treated and other populations under endogeneity and noncompliance. J Appl Econom 32(1):56–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens G, Angrist J (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62(2):467–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens G, Manski C (2004) Confidence intervals for partially identified parameters. Econometrica 72(6):1845–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreider B, Pepper J, Gundersen C, Jolliffe D (2012) Identifying the effects of SNAP (Food Stamps) on child health outcomes when participation is endogenous and misreported. J Am Stat Assoc 107:958–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski C (1990) Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 80:319–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski C (1997) Monotone treatment response. Econometrica 65:1311–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski C, Pepper J (2000) Monotone instrumental variables: with an application to the returns to schooling. Econometrica 68(4):997–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins J, Greenland S (1996) Comment on Angrist, Imbens and Rubin: estimation of the global average treatment effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc 91:456–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano J, Shaikh A (2010) Inference for the identified set in partially identified econometric models. Econometrica 78(1):169–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh A, Vytlacil E (2011) Partial identification in triangular systems of equations with binary dependent variables. Econometrica 79(3):949–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoye J (2009) More on confidence intervals for partially identified parameters. Econometrica 77:1299–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamer E (2010) Partial identification in econometrics. Annu Rev Econ 2:167–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuan Chen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Flores, C.A., Chen, X. (2018). Introduction. In: Average Treatment Effect Bounds with an Instrumental Variable: Theory and Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2017-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2017-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2016-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2017-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics