Abstract
The main aim of this chapter is to support teachers of service-learning (SL) subjects and projects in conducting a scholarly study on some aspect of the teaching and learning process. Key principles from the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL ) are outlined with foundational references provided. Topics include: (1) the benefits of conducting SoTL studies in SL for the teacher/researcher; (2) types of scholarly studies that can be conducted on the teaching of SL; (3) basic background on SoTL including the standards applicable to all forms of scholarly work; and (4) the main stages of drafting questions, designing, conducting, analyzing, and disseminating the results of a scholarly study. The chapter contains a summary checklist of the key questions presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelo, T., & Cross, K. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.)., The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bernstein, D. J. (2008). Peer review and evaluation of the intellectual work of teaching. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(2), 48–51.
Bishop-Clark, C., & Dietz-Uhler, B. (2012). Engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning: A guide to the process, and how to develop a project from start to finish. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered. Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Browning, B. A. (2014). Grant writing for dummies (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Carlson, M., & O’Neal-McElrath, T. (2008). Winning grants: Step by step (3rd ed.)., Jossey-Bass nonprofit guidebook series San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Chan, S., Ngai, G., Yuen, W., & Kwan, K. (2013). Institutional strategies to educate professionals for social responsibility through service-learning. In The International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education. Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Crouch, C., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249.
Deeley, S. J. (2010). Service-learning: Thinking outside the box. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 43–53.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 121–125.
Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. In B. Taylor, B. Taylor, & Corporation for National Service (Eds.), Expanding boundaries: Serving and learning (pp. 2–6). Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine Publications.
Glassick, C. E. (2000). Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Academic Medicine, 75(9), 877–880.
Glassick, C., Huber, M., & Maeroff, G. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hawking, S. (1998). A brief history of time (Updated and expanded tenth anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Hutchings, P. (2000). Introduction: Approaching the scholarship of teaching and learning. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 1–10). Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Lai, C., Chan, J., Wong, I., Fung, J., Pang, P., Fung, K., et al. (2015). Gains and development of undergraduate nursing students during a 2-year community service program. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(3 Suppl), S21–S25. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150218-06.
Lam, J., & Au, J. (2018). Impact on underprivileged people practising expressive textile arts: An exploratory study applied to ex-offenders in Hong Kong. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index, Fashion and Textile Engineering, 12(1), 127.
Light, R., Singer, J., & Willett, J. (1990). By design: Planning research on higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lin, P. M., Kim, Y., Qiu, H., & Ren, L. (2017). Experiential learning in hospitality education through a service-learning project. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 29(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2017.1297716.
Lo, K. W., Chan, S. C., & Ngai, G. (2016). Using a recycled container to setup a community learning centre in rural Cambodia—A case study. In 2016 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC) (pp. 286–291). Seattle, WA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ghtc.2016.7857294.
Mak, B., Lau, C., & Wong, A. (2017). Effects of experiential learning on students: An ecotourism service-learning course. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 17(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2017.1285265.
McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing learning through the scholarship of teaching and learning: The challenges and joys of juggling. Bolton, Mass: Anker Publications.
Murray, C. E., Pope, A. L., & Rowell, P. C. (2010). Promoting counseling students’ advocacy competencies through service-learning. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 2(2), 29–47.
Pechak, C., & Thompson, M. (2011). Going global in physical therapist education: International service-learning in US-based programmes. Physiotherapy Research International, 16, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.501.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.
Simons, L., & Cleary, B. (2006). The influence of service learning on students’ personal and social development. College Teaching, 54(4), 307–319.
Trigwell, K. (2013). Scholarship of teaching and learning. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus a learning-centred approach. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
Weber, R. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.)., Quantitative applications in the social sciences; no. 07–049 Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2016). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 318–329). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Csete, J.M. (2019). Turning Service-Learning Teaching into Scholarly Work. In: T. L. Shek, D., Ngai, G., C. F. Chan, S. (eds) Service-Learning for Youth Leadership. Quality of Life in Asia, vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0448-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0448-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0447-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0448-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)