Skip to main content

Structural Changes and Implications for Urbanization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rural Transformation in the Post Liberalization Period in Gujarat
  • 209 Accesses

Abstract

In order to establish the linkages between non-farm employment growth, urban growth and the changing settlement morphology at the state level, urbanisation process in Gujarat is examined in detail in the fourth chapter. Structural transformation embodies rising rural incomes and growing demand for non-farm services that play a role in bringing about the growth of RNFS. Scholars also argue that structural transformation is a consequence of urban spill over to rural non-farm ‘self-employment’ activities. Small towns are defined as ‘first-tier markets and service providers for rural enterprises and development’ and originate as villages that due to agglomeration economies develop over time as urban centres by virtue of their functions and services. Economic development and urbanization are thus related. This chapter deals with the nature of urbanization process in India with particular reference to Gujarat. With the help of secondary data for the towns of Gujarat, it explores the relationship between the emergence of census towns and the pre-existing metropolitan areas. The constituents of urban growth in Gujarat are decomposed in order to unravel the contribution of census towns and in-situ urbanisation. An attempt is made at identifying the factors that determine the emergence of small/census towns in Gujarat, keeping the district as the enumeration unit. The magnitude of the future development challenge faced due to unrecognized urbanization is ascertained by looking at the status of large villages that are on the threshold of being defined as urban. By relaxing the definition of an urban centre, the challenges of urban growth process are discussed. The last section provides a summary of discussion and highlights issues critical for policy support.

An earlier version of the work in this chapter has appeared in an edited volume (Role of Public Policy in Development Process, New Delhi: Academic Foundation). The present chapter comprises of a more comprehensive analysis and is included with the permission of Academic Foundation, New Delhi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The census provides the distance of each settlement with the nearest class 1 towns; both the nearest city having population of 1 lakh and the second having 5 lakh and above. This information has been used for the present computations, and not the radial distance of each class 1 town based on GIS mapping.

  2. 2.

    As per the census of India out growths are settlements located adjacent to but outside the limit of statutory towns. These are however not independent units, but dependent on the neighboring larger city.

  3. 3.

    6 in Ahmedabad UA, 3 in Okha UA, 1 each with Jamnagar UA, Navsari and Kanavav, 4 with Surat UA, 2 each with Valsad and Vapi towns. The process of merging of census towns with the larger city is ongoing.

  4. 4.

    Quite obviously merging of STs and reclassification of other urban settlements into ST will not have an effect on the urban population.

  5. 5.

    A Nagar Panchayat or Notified Area Council (NAC) or City Council is a settlement in transition from rural to urban. The determination of such areas is left to the states taking into account some criteria like total population, density of population, non-agricultural employment, annual revenue generation, etc. A lot of variation exists amongst the states. The Constitution (74th Amendment) Act, 1992 had specified a population range of 10 to 20,000 for a Nagar Panchayat.

  6. 6.

    As we proceeded for our primary survey of CTs in Gujarat, we encountered that this has in fact already happened with a number of CTs in the periphery of UAs.

  7. 7.

    The density criteria could not be calculated due to absence of readily available data from the primary census abstract of the villages.

  8. 8.

    In 1991, when the detailed breakup of workers was last available, it was shown that only 3.6 percent of the main workers were engaged in allied sectors, with Kutch, Mehsana and Kheda having the highest share (ranging between 6 to 8 percent of main workers).

References

  • Alam, Ashfaque, and Binayak Choudhury. 2016. Spatio-Functional Determinants of Small Towns: A Case Study of Selected Indian Small Towns. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies 28 (2): 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Md. Julfikar, and Deepika Varshney. 2013. Spatial Modelling of Urban Growth and Urban Influence. Environment and Urbanization ASIA 3 (2): 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B.J.L. 1961. City Size Distributions and Economic Development. Economic Development and Cultural Change 9 (4): 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, R.B. 2012. Emerging Pattern of Urbanization in India. Economic and Political Weekly 46 (34): 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmick, S.K., Shubhashis Gangopadhyay, and Shagun Krishnan. 2009. Reforms and Entry: Some Evidence from the Indian Manufacturing Sector. Review of Development Economics 13 (4): 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadène, Philippe, and Mark Holmström, eds. 1998. Decentralized Production in India: Industrial Districts, Flexible Specialization and Employment. New Delhi and London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, Ramesh, R. Saxena, and S. Rana. 2015. Estimates and Analysis of Farm Income in India, 1983–84 to 2011–12. Economic and Political Weekly 50 (2): 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, K., and M. Vijayabaskar. 2014. On the Charts, Off the Tracks. Economic and Political Weekly 49: 49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, E., and K. Marius-Gnanou. 2011. Toward a Better Appraisal of Urbanisation in India. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography 569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, Eric, P. Mukhopadhyay, and Marie-Helene Zerah. 2012. Subaltern Urbanization in India. Economic and Political Weekly 47 (30): 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. 2009. Growth and Non-Farm Employment: The Case of Gujarat. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 52 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • DNA (Daily News & Analysis) (2011). Urbanisation Has Touched Even Tribal Areas in Gujarat, October 17 Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidmann, John. 1961. Cities in Social Transformation. Comparative Studies in Society and History 4 (1): 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaiha, Raghav. 2016. The Overrated Urban Spinoff. The Indian Express, November 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-López, Miquel-Àngel, Camille Hémet, and Elisabet Viladecans-Marsal. 2016. Next Train to the Polycentric City: The Effect of Railroads on Subcenter Formation. Working Paper 2016/14, Institut d’Economia de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guin, Debarshi, and D.N. Das. 2015. New Census Towns in West Bengal – ‘Census Activism’ or Sectoral Diversification. Economic and Political Weekly 50 (14): 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jatav, Manoj, and S. Sen. 2013. Drivers of Non-Farm Employment in Rural India. Economic and Political Weekly 48: 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 1991. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. The Journal of Political Economy 99 (3): 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, Amitabh. 2011a. Politics and Economics of Urban Growth. Economic and Political Weekly 46 (20).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Method in Madness: Urban Data from 2011 Census. Economic and Political Weekly 46 (40): 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, Debolina, and D. Samanta. 2011. Redefining the Inclusive Urban Agenda in India. Economic and Political Weekly 46 (5): 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W.A. 1954. Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester School 22 (2): 139–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, Niti. 2012a. Performance of Crop Sector in Gujarat During High Growth Period: Some Explorations. Agricultural Economics Research Review 25 (2): 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, R.P., ed. 2013. Urbanisation in South Asia: Focus on Mega Cities. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, Partha, and A. Maringati. 2014. Articulating Growth in the Urban Spectrum. Economic and Political Weekly 49 (22): 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, Partha, and Kanhu C. Pradhan. 2012. District-Level Patterns of Urbanisation in India. New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research Urban Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijman, J. 2012. India’s Urban Challenge. Eurasian Geography and Economics 53 (1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu, George. 2008. The Role of Small Towns in Regional Development and Poverty Reduction in Ghana. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32: 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perroux, François. 1955. Note Sur la Notion de Poles Croissance. Economic Appliquee, 1&2: 307–320. Translated by Mette Monsted, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission, Government of India. 2008. The Eleventh Five Year Plan. New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Mid Term Appraisal for Eleventh Five Year Plan 2007–2012. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, K.C. 2013. Unacknowledged Urbanisation – New Census Towns of India. Economic and Political Weekly 48 (36): 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Unacknowledged Urbanisation: The New Census Towns in India. In Subaltern Urbanisation in India: An Introduction to the Dynamics of Ordinary Towns Exploring Urban Change in South Asia, ed. Eric Denis and Marie-Helene Zerah. New Delhi: Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, R. 1989. Urbanisation and Urban Systems in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, B. 2014. Patterns and Practices of Special Transformation in Non-Metros: The Case of Tiruchengode. Economic and Political Weekly 49 (22): 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehman, M.R. 2008. Urban Spatial Growth Analysis of Khulna City. www.geospatialworld.net/paper/Application/Articleview.

  • Rondinelli, D.A. 1983. Towns and Small Cities in Developing Countries. Geographical Review 73 (4): 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samanta, Gopa. 2014. The Politics of Classification and the Complexity of Governance in Census Towns. Economic and Political Weekly 49 (22): 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar, K.S. 2010. Determinants of City Growth and Output in India. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies 22 (1): 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaishar, A. 2004. Small Towns: An Important Part of the Moravian Settlement System. In Cities in Transition, ed. M. Pak and D. Rebernik, 309–318. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, L.N. 2006. Urban Geography. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa, Kiran, and S.P. Kashyap. 1985. Inter-Regional Industrialization in India: Role of Urbanisation and Urban Structure. In Regional Structure of Development and Growth in India, ed. G.P. Mishra, vol. 1. New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Yu. 2000. In Situ Urbanization in Rural China: Case Studies from Fujian Province. Development and Change 31 (2): 413–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Annexure

Annexure

Table 4.8 Percentage of rural workers usually employed in non-farm sector, India, 1983 to 2009–2010

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mehta, N. (2018). Structural Changes and Implications for Urbanization. In: Rural Transformation in the Post Liberalization Period in Gujarat. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8962-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8962-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8961-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8962-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics