Abstract
India is a home to diverse and rich wildlife resources which includes over 52 critically endangered and 51 endangered species. According to IUCN red list of threatened species (Version 2014.3), the grizzled giant squirrel Ratufa macroura is one of the giant arboreal squirrels that inhabited the riverine forest of Srivilliputhur and shares eastern watershed of the Western Ghats located between 9° 21′ to 9° 48’N and 77° 21′ to 77° 46′E. The decline of this species is due to habitat fragmentation due to urban development and the unscrupulous poaching of the squirrels for their fur. Remaining populations in India appear to be significantly more threatened. Great deal of efforts has been made in the last 60 years to preserve the natural habitats. In 1989 the habitat is declared as ‘Srivilliputhur Grizzled Squirrel Wildlife Sanctuary’ in order to protect this inhabitant. The nesting and feeding behaviour observations infer the survival of this giant squirrel which mainly depends on certain group of trees in the dry deciduous and riverine forests of this sanctuary. These squirrels are diurnal and actively forage during early and late hours of the day. In this chapter presented the ecological study and management action plan for the afforestation in the affected and fragmented forest area of R. macroura’s habitat to conserve the threatened giant squirrel.
17.1 Introduction
Srivilliputhur grizzled giant squirrel sanctuary is home to the threatened, Ratufa macroura. This sanctuary is situated at the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats of south India between 9°21′ to 9°48’N and 77°21′ to 77°46′E which were declared as a sanctuary in December 1989 (Tamil Nadu Forest Department 2007). The home range of R. macroura is restricted to riverine forests occurring at an elevation below 800 m MSL. Alagar kovil valley area of this sanctuary enjoys more than 50% of their population. The present study mainly concerns about the interaction of the grizzled giant squirrel with the available forest types that prevail in their home range. The report presents the data about the ecological interaction of the squirrel like feeding and nesting site selection in this sanctuary. Despite the fact that very little is known about its population status, density, distribution and ecology, only a few studies have been carried out on this species in India (Davidar 1989; Ramachandran 1992, 1993; Borges 1992; Joshua 1992; Sharma 1992; Joshua and Johnsingh 1994; Paulraj et al. 1992; Senthilkumar et al. 2007; Baskaran et al. 2011).
17.1.1 Ratufa macroura
This species is endemic to southern India (Kerala and Tamil Nadu) and Sri Lanka (Molur et al. 2005; Herlekar 2010) and classified under the order Rodentia of family Sciuridae. The common name grizzled giant squirrel came from the grey to brown colouration highlighted with white at the top of the tail, giving it a grizzled appearance (Prater 1971). This greyish-brown squirrel weighs around 2 kg and in the size of a small cat. It measures about 735 mm from the snout to the tail with just the tail being 360–400 mm long, longer than the body length. They are most active in the morning and early evening. Midday is a time of rest, and these squirrels are often observed sleeping on a branch (Prater 1971). The giant squirrel differs from other tree squirrels in that they do not sit upright when feeding. Instead, they balance on their hind feet with their body on one side of the branch and the tail acting as a counterbalance on the other side of the branch. Both their hands and feet are equipped with large powerful claws, making them agile climbers (Nowak 1991). These squirrels have a very distinct voice and can be very vocal. Like many primates, R. macroura react to the sighting of predators by provoking a general alarm, a series of calls and barks that alert the other community members to the nearness of the predator. Each individual has a home range that extends between 0.197 and 0.611 ha. (Joshua 1992). Males have range overlap with one or more females especially during the breeding season. There is very little data available on their reproductive cycle. It has a generation time of 7–8 years. The gestation period is believed to last about 28 days. During the breeding season, they construct drays at forked branches where the crowns of neighbouring trees meet. A large nest, similar in appearance to an eagle’s nest, is constructed. Parturition occurs within the nest, and the young remain there for about 2–3 months. Each litter consists of one or two young, and the female nurses them with her three pairs of mammary glands. It has been speculated that R. macroura may raise several litters each year (Kanoje 2008). R. macroura show limited social behaviour. They are mostly solitary, sometimes live in pairs and show high territoriality. They have been observed to camouflage with the tree branches by flattening themselves against the branches and remaining motionless when frightened. Overall, Ratufa macroura are very wary and keep them well hidden in the dense vegetation. R. macroura enjoy a diverse kind of diet that includes fruits, tender leaves, seeds, insects, bird eggs and even the bark of some trees. Plate 17.1 describes the digital documentation of feeding, resting and nesting behaviour of R. macroura from Srivilliputhur grizzled giant squirrel sanctuary.
17.1.2 Present Status of R. macroura
According to IUCN (2010), India has only an estimated population of less than 500 mature R. macroura. Habitat loss and degradation due to agro-industry farming, small-scale logging, selective logging, increase in human settlements, forest fire, interspecific competition, competition from alien species, hunting for local consumption purposes and presence of domestic predators have been observed to be the major threats for this species (Joshua and Johnsingh 1992, 1994; Molur et al. 2005; Joshua et al. 2008; Vanitharani et al. 2011). According to the IUCN red list of threatened species (Version 2014.2), the grizzled giant squirrel is facing a high risk of extinction in the wild. Information on the exact population size and density of grizzled giant squirrels in India is lacking.
17.1.3 Habitat the Determinant of Species Survival
Spatial and temporal changes of a forest are an important factor that determines the availability of the habitat for any species (Wilcox and Murphy 1984; McGarigal and McComb 1995). Many aspects of the behavioural ecology of animals in nature like dispersal, home range sizes, territoriality, dietary patterns and time-activity budgets are fundamentally linked to the amount of space used in a habitat and movements within it (Koprowski 2005; Verbeylen et al. 2009). The extensive canopy connectivity facilitates the movement and dispersal of arboreal mammals (Datta and Goyal 2008; Nandini and Parthasarathy 2008).
Grizzled giant squirrel being an arboreal mammal depends on forests and also possesses many other co-evolutionary relationships with the forest plants for the survival. The habitat of R. macroura requires the specific tree composition for their survival. They are critically dependent on mature forests that provide tree tissues and seeds as food, stems and canopies as launch sites and cavities and canopies as nest sites. Arboreal mammals are dependent on the spatial structure of the forest for nesting (Umapathy and Kumar 2000). These squirrels are known to prefer areas with good food availability and canopy connectivity to live and build their nests (Ransome and Sullivan 1997; Kumar et al. 2002; Kumara and Singh 2006; Srinivas et al. 2008). Individuals will have a better chance to thrive when they were more successful at finding food, mating and avoiding predators. Presence of nests in an area reflects the quality of the habitat around it and also indicates the degree of usage of the area by the species (Getty 1981; Datta and Pal 1993). Choosing a nest site is among the important choices made by an animal as it protects it from predation, provides thermoregulation and is also important in the breeding ecology of the animal. The giant squirrel constructs globular nests or drays using leaves and twigs, multiple in numbers within their home range (Srinivas et al. 2008).
Squirrels usually prefer trees significantly larger in all characteristics with large girth at breast height (gbh) and taller height with number of branches for nest building. The nesting trees were significantly larger in all characteristics than the non-nesting ones sampled in the population. According to Ramachandran (1992) such biased selection towards matured trees with greater canopy continuity could facilitate easy movement to and from the nest in all the directions, a major advantage to escape from predators and to move to other parts of the home range for foraging and other activities.
17.1.4 Threats for Survival
Fragmentation of the canopy and associated disturbances can bring about changes in the behaviour of arboreal mammals (Umapathy and Kumar 2000) with consequences for their survival and reproduction. Owing to the increasing human pressure, the habitats of grizzled giant squirrel are threatened by fragmentation through deforestation (Tikader 1983; Joshua 1992; Joshua and Johnsing 1994; Verbeylen et al. 2009).
The study has come out with few suggestions by saying that by increasing the Giant squirrel interactive tree species canopy in the affected/fragmented forest cover of the sanctuary will conserve the endangered squirrel as well as other dependent biodiversity of sanctuary.
17.2 Methods
Field survey was carried out to determine the plant-squirrel interaction in the Srivilliputhur grizzled giant squirrel sanctuary using the line transect method (Cox 1990). Each transect had a length of 2.0 km within the quadrates (5 km2). Grizzled giant squirrel interactive tree species vegetation sampling was done by using quadrate method in all the forest habitats of grizzled giant squirrel. In this study, mostly the riparian areas of the sanctuary are considered potentially suitable for the conservation of the grizzled giant squirrel, and hence the surrounding matrix habitat was ignored. The grizzled giant squirrel interacting tree species are identified as ‘focal plant’ species. A small sample of plant twig from the focal plant species was collected, and a herbarium is maintained in the Zoology Department Research Centre of Sarah Tucker College. The vernacular names of the tree species were recorded, and their scientific names were ascertained by Dr. Chelladurai, (Retd.) Botanist, Government Siddha Medical College, Palayamkottai, and Dr. Gopalan, (Retd.) Scientist, Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore. Grizzled giant squirrel’s interaction with the focal tree species were directly observed during the active forage time and during breeding seasons. The observations were recorded from a spot about 10.0–20.0 m away from the focal plant using a pair of binoculars. Extended watches (a minimum of 1.0 h) were done near the focal plant. During the extended watch, feeding and nest building activities with the focal plants were documented.
17.3 Result and Discussion
Being an arboreal, diurnal giant squirrel inhabits tall larger trees of the sanctuary for food, shelter and movement. Understanding the species distribution and its resource requirements is essential for its long-term conservation plans. R. macroura interact predominantly with 35 tree species that prevail in the sanctuary, mainly for their survival. It is apparent that the composition of tree species and structural attributes of the forests play a major role in the use of the habitat by the giant squirrel (Ramachandran 1992; Paulraj and Kasinathan 1993; Paulraj et al. 1992; Molur et al. 2005; Vanitharani et al. 2011). Nesting and foraging interactive focal trees species of the grizzled giant squirrel at Srivilliputhur Wildlife Sanctuary were documented in Table 17.1.
17.3.1 Foraging Interactions
The grizzled giant squirrel (Ratufa macroura) plays an important role as a seed disperser to their foraging trees via dropping seeds as they cruise over the canopy; the key tree species dependent are Artocarpus heterophyllus, Artocarpus hirsuta, Ficus benghalensis, Ficus religiosa, Ficus racemosa, Tamarindus indica, Mangifera indica, Lannea coromandelica, Morinda tinctoria, Syzygium cumini, Eriodendrum pentandrum, Polyalthia suberosa, Aglaia elaeagnoidea, Chassalia curviflora and Sapindus emarginatus distributed in the dry deciduous forests of Srivilliputhur Wildlife Sanctuary. During the extended watch near some of these key tree species, the squirrels were observed to eat tender leaves of Tamarindus indica. Joshua (1992) and Ellerman (1961) also reported similar feeding habits of the squirrel. Ripe fruit pulp of M. indica and Artocarpus spp., fig fruits and teak flowers are also the most significant contributor of the diet of these squirrels. Overall, the present study has recorded that the squirrel feeds on a total of 35 tree species. Among their interacting trees, 37% (15 species) are used for both nesting and foraging trees. During the non-fruiting season or during the scarcity of the fruits, grizzled giant squirrel devours the bark and leaves of some key tree species. Becker et al. (1985) and Borges (1992, 2007) suggest these squirrels prefer fruits and seeds, when they are available. Squirrels usually avoid consuming fresh seeds of S. cuminii since fresh tissues (bark, fruit pulp, seeds) of these trees are known to be hypoglycaemic (Rafiullah et al. 2006; Villasenor and Lamadrid 2006).
17.3.2 Nest Selection Interaction
Grizzled giant squirrel being a canopy dweller largely depends on the tree canopy contiguity for their movement, nesting and breeding (Joshua 1992; Thorington and Cifelli 1989). Giant squirrels are known to build nests in several trees, sometimes even within a small area (Prater 1971). Of the 35 squirrel interacting key tree species within the sanctuary, the squirrels preferred only 25 of them for nest building. It is noteworthy that the tree species Pterocarpus marsupium, Stereospermum chelonoides, Schleichera oleosa, Tamarindus indica, T. arjuna and Maesa indica are seen with multiple nests. S. oleosa was the most preferred tree species for nesting followed by M. indica. These trees are mostly distributed along the rivers and streams. The dense canopy cover and higher canopy height of these trees provide contiguity that could offer better protection and way to escape from the predators. Nagarajan et al. (2011) suggested that many arboreal dwellers prefer this type of habitat.
According to Kanoje (2008) in the Sitanadi Wildlife Sanctuary, the giant squirrel’s most common nesting trees were Terminalia tomentosa and S. oleosa. The other major species of nesting trees were S. cuminii, T. indica and Terminalia spp. Kanoje also recorded 207 nesting trees and observed approximately 77.68% of the nests were found on deciduous trees (25 species), while only 5 species of nesting trees were located in the evergreen forest.
17.3.3 Threats for Survival
Human interference through various means within the sanctuary threatens the well-being of the habitat used by the giant squirrels. Threats arise as poaching, loss of habitat due to illegal cutting of trees, overgrazing by livestock, frequent forest fires in the summer season and overexploitation of non-timber forest produce (Joshua and Johnsingh 1994). Forest fragmentation is considered to be the biggest threat to global biodiversity (Wilcox and Murphy 1984). The ability of a species to persist at sites after disturbance depends on its ability to modify its behaviour, foraging and dietary patterns to withstand the changes in forest structure and composition. The observations suggest the grizzled giant squirrel really find it hard to cope with the changing habitat. Keeping this in mind, the present study has suggested the plantation of the 35 grizzled giant squirrel interacting tree species in the fragmented forest area to conserve the grizzled giant squirrel.
17.3.4 Management Recommendations
Grizzled giant squirrel shows restricted distribution mostly in riverine habitats. But the riverine habitats along the sanctuary are generally patchy in forest coverage. Restoration of the habitat in the gap and maintenance of canopy continuity through afforestation by the preferred tree species like T. indica, S. oleosa and M. indica can enhance the population size of the grizzled giant squirrel as well as the other faunal diversity.
In addition reducing commercial exploitation of T. indica fruits in large scale by the local people and government sectors can lessen the anthropogenic pressure. Strict legislation and management actions against grazing pressure along the riverine habitats will also help to achieve neutral restoration of the forest cover in the sanctuary and will also enhance the long-term survival of grizzled giant squirrel species. Still these threatened species lacks an updated comprehensive database about the distribution and population status across its habitat. Being a threatened species, it definitely deserves the attention of conservationists. Paulraj (1991) suggested that unless the species receives immediate attention for its protection and conservation, it will be a difficult task to save it from extinction.
17.4 Conclusion
Accurately forecasted impacts of disturbance on the native flora and fauna indicates, it is essential to conserve the forest habitats of the sanctuary to conserve biodiversity and the threatened Ratufa macroura, grizzled giant squirrel. The present study has identified 35 native and giant squirrel interactive tree species. At the same time, this interaction also reviews the complement and reward gained by the squirrels from the plants for their rendered propagation services. If these squirrels preferred key tree species are planted in the fragmented and degraded forest areas that will enhance natural forest restoration and also habitat for the native threatened and endangered animals.
References
Baskaran N, Senthilkumar K, Saravanan M (2011) A new site record of the grizzled giant squirrel Ratufa macroura (Pennant, 1769) in the Hosur forest division, Eastern Ghats, India and its conservation significance. J Threatened Taxa 3(6):1837–1841
Becker P, Leighton M, Payne JB (1985) Why tropical squirrels carry seeds out of source crowns. J Trop Ecol 1:185–186
Borges RM (1992) A nutritional analysis of foraging in the Malabar giant squirrel (Ratufa indica). Biol J Linnean Soc 47:1–21
Borges RM (2007) The Indian giant squirrel (Ratufa indica Ersleben 1777). In: Johnsingh AJT, Manjrekar N (eds) The mammals of South Asia. Universities Press, Hyderabad
Cox G (1990) Laboratory manual of general ecology, 6th edn. William C. Brown, Dubuque
Datta A, Goyal SP (2008) Responses of diurnal tree squirrels to selective logging in western Arunachal Pradesh. Cur Sci 95:895–902
Datta T, Pal BC (1993) The effect of human interference on the nesting of the open bill stork Anastomus oscitans at the Raiganj Wildlife Sanctuary, India. Biol Conserv 64(2):149–154
Davidar P (1989) Grizzled giant squirrel Ratufa macroura – distribution in Kudirayar. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 86(3):437
Ellerman JR (1961) The fauna of India including Pakistan, Burma and Ceylon. Mammalia – 2nd edition, Rodentia. The Zool Surv India Calcutta 3:884
Getty T (1981) Analysis of central-place space use patterns: the elastic disc revisited. Ecology 62:907–914
Herlekar IR (2010) Effect of canopy fragmentation on the patterns of habitat use of the grizzled giant squirrel Ratufa macroura in Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru
IUCN (2010) Red list of threatened species version 2010.1 downloaded on May 27: 2010
Joshua J (1992) Ecology of the endangered grizzled giant squirrel (Ratufa macroura) in Tamil Nadu, South India. PhD thesis. Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu
Joshua J, Johnsingh AJT (1992) Status of endangered grizzled giant squirrel and its habitats. In: Singh K, Singh JS (eds) Tropical ecosystems: ecology and management. Willey Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, pp 151–159
Joshua J, Johnsingh AJT (1994) Impact of biotic disturbances on the habitat and population of the endangered grizzled giant squirrel Ratufa macroura in South India. Biol Conserv 68:29–34
Joshua J, de A Goonatilake Wildpts, Molur S (2008) Ratufa macroura. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2010.4. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 06 June 2011
Kanoje RS (2008) Nesting sites of Indian giant squirrels in Sitanadi Wildlife Sanctuary, India. Cur Sci 95(7):882–884
Koprowski JL (2005) Impacts of fragmentation on tree squirrels: a review and synthesis. Anim Conserv 8:369–376
Kumar MA, Singh M, Srivastava K, Udhayan A, Kumara HN, Sharma AK (2002) Distribution patterns, relative abundance and management of mammals in Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary, Tamil Nadu, India. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 99(2):184–210
Kumara HN, Singh M (2006) Distribution and relative abundance of giant squirrel and flying squirrel in Karnataka, India. Mammalia 70:40–47
McGarigal K, McComb WC (1995) Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in Oregon coast range. Ecol Monogr 65:235–260
Molur S, Srinivasulu C, Srinivasulu B, Walker S, Nameer PO, Ravikumar L (2005) Status of non-volant small mammals: conservation assessment and management plan (C.A.M.P) workshop report. Zoo Outreach Organization/CBSG-South Asia, Coimbatore, India, p 618
Nagarajan B, Venkatesan S, Mani J, Sanjay K, Srivastava AAD (2011) Some aspects of the ecology of the Indian giant squirrel Ratufa indica (Erxleben, 1777) in the tropical forests of Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, southern India and their conservation implications. J Threatened Taxa 3(7):1899–1908
Nandini R, Parthasarathy N (2008) Food habits of the Indian giant flying squirrel (Petaurista philippensis) in a rain forest fragment, Western Ghats. J Mammal 89:1550–1556
Nowak RM (1991) Walke’s mammals of the world, 5th edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Paulraj S (1991) Grizzled giant squirrel in the final throes of extinction process. Zoos Print 6(10):1–2
Paulraj S, Kasinathan N (1993) Scanty known grizzled giant squirrel (Ratufa macroura) of India: status and conservation. Indian Forester 119:828–833
Paulraj S, Kasinathan N, Rajendran K (1992) Studies on the biology of grizzled giant squirrel Part I. Population, feeding, home range and activity pattern. Research report, Tamil Nadu State Forest Department
Prater SH (1971) The book of Indian animals. In: Bombay natural history society. Oxford University Press, Mumbai, p 124
Rafiullah MRM, Siddiqui AW, Mir SR, Ali M, Pillai KK, Singh S (2006) Anti-diabetic activity of some Indian medicinal plants. Pharm Biol 44:95–99
Ramachandran KK (1992) Certain aspects of ecology and behaviour of Malabar giant squirrel Ratufa indica (Schreber). PhD thesis. Department of Zoology, University of Kerala, p 191
Ramachandran KK (1993) Status survey and distribution of endangered grizzled giant squirrel in Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India. Indian J For 16(3):226–231
Ransome DB, Sullivan TP (1997) Food limitation and habitat preference of Glaucomys sabrinus and Tamiasciurus hudsonicus. J Mammal 79:538–549
Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3
Senthilkumar K, Agoramoorthy G, Hsu MJ (2007) Population size, density and conservation status of grizzled giant squirrel in Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, India. Mammalia 71(1):89–94
Sharma N (1992) Status and ecology of grizzled giant squirrel (Ratufa macroura) in the Palani Hills. Pondicherry University, M.Sc dissertation
Srinivas V, Venugopal PD, Ram S (2008) Site occupancy of the Indian giant squirrel Ratufa indica (Erxleben) in Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, Tamil Nadu, India. Special editing: Arboreal squirrel. Cur Sci 95(7):889–894
Tamil Nadu Forest Department (2007) Wildlife biodiversity, Srivilliputhur Grizzled Squirrel Wildlife Sanctuary. https://www.forest.in.nic.in/wildbiodiversity/ws_sgsws.html
Thorington RW Jr, Cifelli RL (1989) The usual significance of the giant squirrels (Ratufa). In: Daniel JC, Serrao JS (eds) Conservation in developing countries: problem and prospects. Proceedings of the Centenary Seminar of the Bombay Natural History Society, Oxford University Press, pp 212–219
Tikader BK (1983) Threatened animals of India. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, p 307
Umapathy G, Kumar A (2000) Impacts of the habitat fragmentation on time budget and feeding ecology of lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus) in rain forest fragments of Anamalai hills, South India. Primate report, p 58
Vanitharani J, Kavitha BB, Margaret VI (2011) Probe in to the conservation status of Ratufa macroura through the analysis of plant-animal interaction in the Srivilliputhur Wildlife Sanctuary. J Adv Biotech 10(10):67–69
Verbeylen G, Wauters LA, De Bruyn L, Matthysen E (2009) Woodland fragmentation affects space use of Eurasian red squirrels. Acta Oecol 35:94–103
Villasenor IM, Lamadrid RA (2006) Comparative anti-hyperglycemic potentials of medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol 104:129–131
Wilcox BA, Murphy DD (1984) Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am Nat 125:879–887
Acknowledgements
The author specially thanks the State Forestry Research Institute, Kolapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu Forest Department, for allowing us to collaborate in the research work under taken by the Tamil Nadu Forest Department, afforestation programme and biodiversity conservation programme. Special thanks were also acknowledged for their financial assistance and valuable guidance during the research period in the Srivilliputhur Wildlife Sanctuary to assess the present status of biodiversity and of Ratufa macroura through plant-animal interactions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vanitharani, J. (2018). Conservation Status and Guidelines for the Maintenance of Endangered Grizzled Giant Squirrel Ratufa macroura in Srivilliputhur Wildlife Sanctuary. In: Sivaperuman, C., Venkataraman, K. (eds) Indian Hotspots. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6983-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6983-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6982-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6983-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)