Abstract
This paper engages the question of economic hospitality , of a radical welcoming of all that is other than ourselves into an economy, a home in which we dwell. The sense of welcoming here, adapted in a simplified way from Emmanuel Levinas , is grounded in a pre-ontological, pre-existential, pre-ethical, pre-social and pre-linguistic absolute regard for the “Other,” persons or otherwise. The essay is best understood as a critical exercise in something like a radical and hermeneutic displacement of the most common philosophical and moral protocols of modern economics. Those protocols have to do with the priority of an assumed self, armed with “self-interests” and the power to transform life in the name of those interests in a competitive and strategic world. Otherness, in this scheme, is thus rendered instrumental. Everything other than the self is either possessed in the name of the self or ignored; and, more extremely, is valued only in terms of what’s in it for the self. That which has nothing “for me” is not welcome. I sense that this posture is at the core of our contemporary economic problems, and I believe that we will make little progress in dealing with those problems unless and until we embrace an alternative axiology to the one described above. I offer one idea—a radical and unwilled hospitality—to help us move into a better place, a place of living well and doing well. That sort of hospitality is a necessary moral-ontological precursor to communities of solidarity and social harmony. I offer this as a thought experiment, hospitality as one idea among many others which make up an “economic imaginary” of how we might live more justly, more peacefully, as economic beings. Thought experiments are among the more potent practical acts available to us—democracy, human rights and freedoms, the abolition of slavery and on and on could not have tilled the practical soil without the ideas of those who first announced them. Bold ideas, ideas that the powers-that-be have always deemed silly and impractical, do in fact make different modes of life possible. Those modes begin with a willingness to entertain a very simple request—“try thinking about it this way.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bregman, R. (2016). Utopia for Realists and how we can get there (trans: Manton, E.). London, Bloomsbury Publishing.
Buddhasa, B. (1996). Mindfulness and breathing: A manual for serious beginners (trans: Bhikku, S.). Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.
Caputo, J. (1987). Radical hermeneutics: Repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.
Hand, S. (1989). The Levinas reader (p. 1989). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Huai-Nan, T. (1985). As cited in Charles LeBlanc (trans.). Huai-Nan Tzu: Philosophical synthesis in early Han thought: The idea of resonance (Kan-Ying) with a translation and analysis of chapter six. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Kant, I. (1795/1970). Perpetual peace. In D. Reiss (Ed.), Kant’s political writings (pp. 93–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: MacMillan.
Leung, G., & Stone, M. (2009). Otherwise than hospitality: A disputation on the relation of ethics to law and politics. Law and Critique, 20, 193–206.
Levinas, E. (1961). Totalité et Infine: Essai sur L’extériorité. The Hague: Martinus Njhoff Publishers.
Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (trans: Lingis, A.). The Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Levinas, E. (1989). There is: Existence without existents. In S. Hand (Ed.), The Levinas reader (pp. 29–36). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (trans. Arthur Goldhammer). Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Redler, L. (2000). Open, empty and other. Contemporary Buddhism, 1(1), 77–89. doi:10.1081/14639940008573722.
Rosato, J. (2012). Woman as vulnerable self: The trope of maternity in Levinas’s otherwise than being. Hypatia, 27(2), 348–365.
Sallis, J. (1998). Levinas and the elemental. Research in phenomenology, 28(1), 152–159.
Schumacher, E. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. New York: Harper & Row.
Taylor, C. (1996). Iris Murdoch and moral philosophy. In M. Antonaccio & W. Schweiker (Eds.), Iris Murdoch and the search for human goodness (pp. 3–28). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Toulmin, S. (1990). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. New York: The Free Press.
Verter, M. (2013). The flow of the breath: Levinas mouth-to mouth with Buddhism. In F. Garrett & S. Mattice (Eds.), Levinas and Asian thought (pp. 225–239). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Editor(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arrington, C.E. (2018). Eminent Otherness: Toward an Economy of Hospitality. In: Yamash’ta, S., Yagi, T., Hill, S. (eds) The Kyoto Manifesto for Global Economics. Creative Economy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6478-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6478-4_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6477-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6478-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)