Skip to main content

Advance in Health Risk Assessment Methodology of Brownfield Sites in China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Twenty Years of Research and Development on Soil Pollution and Remediation in China
  • 2518 Accesses

Abstract

At China’s current urbanization rate, it is estimated that 350 million people will be added to its total urban population by 2025 (Woetzel et al. 2009). As cities continue to expand, many older industrial facilities along the edge of, or within, the city boundaries are being relocated or closed, leaving behind derelict, underused and abandoned land contaminated by the former industrial activities, which also are called brownfield sites. These sites can be valuable land for redevelopment but require special intervention to bring them back into beneficial use. Since the beginning of this century, attentions have been being paid to the management of such sites, and the first guidance specified on human health risk assessment of brownfield sites in China was published in 2004 by Jiang (Jiang and Wang 2004). In 2009, the first official technical guideline on investigation and health risk of brownfield sites was issued by Beijing Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau (BQTSB) (BQTSB 2009) followed by the first official soil screening levels for health risk assessment in 2011 (BQTSB 2011). The Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) started drafting technical guidelines on site investigation and health risk assessment in 2008, which were issued officially in 2014 (MEP 2014a, b, c), and the national wide soil screening values have been submitted for approval (MEP 2016). Besides, some other developed cities, such as Shanghai, Chongqing, Zhejiang, Guangdong, e.g., have been engaged in drafting relevant technical guidelines and soil screening values (ZQTSB 2013; GQTSB 2014; SEPB 2015a, b). In addition to developing regulatory guidelines to support the management of brownfield sites, the methodologies recommended in issued guidelines have been being applied in assessing human health risk of numerous brownfield sites, and results have been used to help regulars make the final management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beijing Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau (2009) Environmental site assessment guideline (DB11/T 656-2009). Beijing Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau (2011) Screening levels for soil environmental risk assessment of sites (DB11/T 811-2011). Beijing Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau (2016a) Technical guideline for investigation and risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in contaminated sites (DB11/T 1280-2015), Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau (2016b) Environmental assessment guideline for remediated soil reuse from contaminated site (DB11/T 1281-2015). Beijing Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y, Chen X (2011) Lead (Pb) and arsenic (As) bioaccessibility in various soils from south China. Environ Monit Assess 177(1-4):481–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Day J P, Hart M, Robinson MS (1975) Lead in urban street dust

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA U S (2001) Risk assessment guidance for superfund: volume 3—process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment chapter l, Part A. Washington, IX

    Google Scholar 

  • Guangdong Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau (GQTSB) (2014) Risk screening values for soil heavy metal-the pearl river delta area. Guangdong Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau, Guangdong

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen J (2007) Measuring bioavailability: from a scientific approach to standard methods. J Environ Qual 36(5):1420–1428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia XY, Xia TX, Jiang L et al (2014) Application of PRA in deriving soil cleanup level for a coking plant site. China Environ Sci 34(1):2220–2227

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Wang Y (2004) Guidance on site investigation and risk assessment. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Zhong MS, Xia TX et al (2012) Health risk assessment based on benzene concentration detected in soil gas. Res Environ Sci 25(6):717–723

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Jia XY, Xia TX et al (2013a) Research on application of PRA in health risk assessment of soil in a coking plant site. Res Environ Sci 26(2):220–226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Zhong MS, Zhu XY et al (2013b) Application of multiple lines of evidence analysis technology in the assessment of sites contaminated by heavy metals. Environ Sci 34(9):3641–3647

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhasz AL, Weber J, Smith E et al (2009) Assessment of four commonly employed in vitro arsenic bioaccessibility assays for predicting in vivo relative arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 43(24):9487–9494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JN, Hou H, Wei Y et al (2013) Bioaccessibility and health risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soil from Zhuzhou, China. Res Environ Sci 26:139–1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Xia X, Yang L et al (2010) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soils of different land uses in Beijing, China: distribution, sources and their correlation with the city's urbanization history. J Hazard Mater 177(1):1085–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma WL (2010) The distribution characteristic of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil and air in China and simulation on large scale. Dissertation for the doctoral degree of Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Marina A, Jiang L, Eugenio N et al (2012) Arsenic probability distributions in soil from brownfield sites in Beijing (China): baseline evaluation and related implications for site assessment studies. Front Environ Sci Eng 9(3):465–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner B, Welge P, Hack A et al (2006) Comparison of soil Pb in vitro bioaccessibility and in vivo bioavailability with Pb pools from a sequential soil extraction. Environ Sci Technol 40(8):2812–2818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medlin EA (1997) An in vitro method for estimating the relative bioavailability of lead in humans

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environmental Protection (2014a) Technical guidelines for environmental site investigation (HJ25.1-2014). Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environmental Protection (2014b) Technical guidelines for environmental site monitoring (HJ25.2-2014). Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environmental Protection (2014c) Technical guidelines for risk assessment of contaminated site (HJ25.3-2014). Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environmental Protection (2016) Risk screening guideline values for soil contamination of development land (under review). Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanail CP, Smith R (2007) Incorporating bioaccessibility in detailed quantitative human health risk assessments. J Environ Sci Health A 42(9):1193–1202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oomen AG, Hack A, Minekus M et al (2002) Comparison of five in vitro digestion models to study the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 36(15):3326–3334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oomen AG, Brandon EFA, Swartjes FA, et al (2006) How can information on oral bioavailability improve human health risk assessment for lead-contaminated soils? Implementation and Scientific Basis

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio L, Vrščaj B, Schulin R et al (2009) Metals pollution and human bioaccessibility of topsoils in Grugliasco (Italy). Environ Pollut 157(2):680–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenberg F, Karlson UG, Gustafsson Ö et al (2010) Low accessibility and chemical activity of PAHs restrict bioremediation and risk of exposure in a manufactured gas plant soil. Environ Pollut 158(5):1214–1220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid BJ, Stokes JD, Jones KC et al (2000) Nonexhaustive cyclodextrin-based extraction technique for the evaluation of PAH bioavailability. Environ Sci Technol 34(15):3174–3179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby MV, Davis A, Schoof R et al (1996) Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environ Sci Technol 30(2):422–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semple KT, Doick KJ, Jones KC et al (2004) Peer reviewed: defining bioavailability and bioaccessibility of contaminated soil and sediment is complicated. Environ Sci Technol 38(12):228A–231A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau (SEPB) (2015a) Health risk screening level of contaminated soil. Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau (SEPB) (2015b) Technical guidelines for risk assessment of contaminated sites. Shanghai Environmental Protection Bureau, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA, Chiou CT, Kammer JA et al (1990) Effect of soil moisture on the sorption of trichloroethene vapor to vadose-zone soil at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey. Environ Sci Technol 24(5):676–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Wiele TR, Verstraete W, Siciliano SD (2004) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon release from a soil matrix in the in vitro gastrointestinal tract. J Environ Qual 33(4):1343–1353

    Google Scholar 

  • Woetzel J, Mendonca L, Devan J et al (2009) Preparing for China’s urban billion. McKinsey Global Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wragg J, Cave M, Basta N et al (2011) An inter-laboratory trial of the unified BARGE bioaccessibility method for arsenic, cadmium and lead in soil. Sci Total Environ 409(19):4016–4030

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xia T, Jiang L, Jia X et al (2014) Application of probabilistic risk assessment at a coking plant site contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Front Environ Sci Eng 8(3):441–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu S, Li X (2011) Distribution, availability, and sources of trace metals in different particle size fractions of urban soils in Hong Kong: implications for assessing the risk to human health. Environ Pollut 159(5):1317–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhejiang Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau (ZQTSB) (2013) Guideline for risk assessment of contaminated site. Zhejiang Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau, Zhejiang

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong MS, Jiang L, Jia XY et al (2013a) Deriving soil gas screening value for vapor intrusion scenario. Res Environ Sci 26(9):979–988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong MS, Jiang L, Yao JJ et al (2013b) Application of tiered approach to assess the impact of backfilling remediated soil on groundwater. Environ Sci 34(3):907–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong MS, Jiang L, Jia XY et al (2014a) Derivation of soil screening values for groundwater protection of Beijing. Res Environ Sci 27(8):80–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong MS, Jiang L, Yao JJ et al (2014b) Impact of biodegradation on attenuation factor and screening level of benzene in soil vapor. Res Environ Sci 27(2):178–185

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong MS, Peng C, Jiang L et al (2015a) Factors controlling as bioaccessibility in aged soils and corresponding health risk. Res Environ Sci 28(2):267–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong MS, Peng C, Jiang L et al (2015b) Factors controlling Cd bioaccessibility in aged soils and its implication on soil screening values. China Environ Sci 35(7):2217–2224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Jiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Science Press & Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jiang, L., Zhong, M., Jia, X., Xia, T. (2018). Advance in Health Risk Assessment Methodology of Brownfield Sites in China. In: Luo, Y., Tu, C. (eds) Twenty Years of Research and Development on Soil Pollution and Remediation in China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6029-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics