Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 1321–1337Cite as

Netnography: Researching Online Populations

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter explores the transition of netnography, a consumer marketing research method, to the field of health social science research. In contemporary society, the Internet has become an essential communication and information medium. Researchers are increasingly using the Internet as a research medium for participant recruitment and data collection. Netnography, an adaptation of ethnography, is primarily concerned with online communication as a source of data to form an understanding of a cultural phenomenon. It is through the use of this qualitative research method that holistic research about online cultures and communities can be conducted. In the provision of a common set of methodological procedures and protocols, netnography contributes to the debate of researching online populations, and innovation in appropriate settings. Using the example of a study related to fitness communities on social networking sites (SNSs), this chapter will identify key strengths, practical implications, and ethical considerations of netnography. Discussion focuses on netnography as a dynamic adaptation of a research method emerging in the field of health social sciences research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amit V, Rapport N. The trouble with community: anthropological reflections on movement, identity and collectively. London: Pluto; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Internet Researchers Ethics Working Group. Ethical decision-making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). 2012. http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2016.

  • Attard A, Coulson N. A thematic analysis of patient communication in Parkinson’s disease online support group discussion forums. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28(2):500–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes N, Penn-Edwards S, Sim C. A dialogic about using Facebook status updates for education research: a PhD student’s journey. Educ Res Eval. 2015;21(2):109–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett EH, O’Riordan K. Ethics of internet research: contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics Inf Technol. 2002;4:233–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean EA. Man shall not live by bread, at all: a netnography of the key characteristics and purposes of an online gluten-free community. Brigham Young University, all theses and dissertations. Paper 4082. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu A. Mediating ethnography: objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet. Soc Epistemol. 2004;18(2–3):139–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaven Z, Laws C. ‘Never let me down again’1: loyal customer attitudes towards ticket distribution channels for live music events: a netnographic exploration of the US Leg of the Depeche Mode 2005–2006 World Tour. Manag Leis. 2007;12(2–3):120–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beneito-Montagut R. Ethnography goes online: towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qual Res. 2011;11(6):716–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengry-Howell A, Wiles R, Nind M, & Crow G. A review of the academic impact of three methodological innovations: netnoraphy, child-led research and creative research methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. University of Southamption. NCRM Hub. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger IE, O’Reilly N, Parent MM, Seguin B, Hernandez. Determinants of sport participation among canadian adolescents. Sport Manage Rev. 2008;11:277–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotsky SR, Giles D. Inside the “pro-ana” community: a covert online participant observation. Eat Disord. 2007;15(2):93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlie D, Hewer P. Cultures of consumption of caraficionados. Int J Sociol Social Policy. 2007;27(3/4):106–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five aproaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia N, Zhang D. Online qualitative research in the age of e-commerce: data sources and approaches. Forum Qual Soc Res Sozialforschung. 2004;5(2), Art. 29. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/594/1289. Accessed 25 Apr 2014.

  • Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Facebook. Statement of rights and responsibilities. 2014. http://www.facebook.com/legal/terms. Accessed 10 June 2015.

  • Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, Davidson L. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002;36(6):717–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füller J, Jawecki G, Mühlbacher H. Innovation creation by online basketball communities. J Bus Res. 2007;60(1):60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grbich C. Qualitative data analysis: an introduction. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson M, Johnson NF, Auld G. Silences of ethical practice: dilemmas for researchers using social media. Educ Res Eval. 2013;19(6):546–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber S, Griffin A. Internet-mediated technologies and mixed methods research: problems and prospects. J Mixed Methods Res. 2013;7(1):43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine C. Virtual ethnography. London: Sage; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hine C. Internet research and the sociology of cyber-social-scientific knowledge. Inf Soc. 2005;21(4):239–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine C. The internet and research methods. In: Gilbert N, editor. Researching social life. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2008. p. 304–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isupova OG. Support through patient internet-communities: lived experience of Russian in vitro fertilization patients. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2011;6(3). https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v6i3.5907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson D. Doing research in cyberspace. Field Methods. 1999;11(2):127–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James N, Busher H. Ethical issues in online research. Educ Res Eval. 2015;21(2):89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd PS, Parshall MB. Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qual Health Res. 2000;10(3):293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets R. ‘I want to believe’: a netnography of the X-philes’ subculture of consumption. Adv Consum Res. 1997;24:470–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets R. The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. J Mark Res. 2002;39:61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets R. Netnography: doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets R. Netnography: redefined. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb R. Facebook recruitment. Res Ethics. 2011;7(2):72–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer R, Beckman SC. Sensitive research topics: netnography revisited. Qual Mark Res Int J. 2005;8(2):189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P, Serry T. Making sense of qualitative data. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 421–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann C, Stewart F. Internet communication in qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. London: Sage; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MR, Otnes CC. Exploring cross-cultural ambivalence: a netnography of intercultural wedding message boards. J Bus Res. 2005;58(1):89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nind M, Wiles R, Bengry-Howell A, Crow G. Methodological innovation and research ethics: forces in tension or forces in harmony? Qual Res. 2012;13(6):650–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonnecke B, Andrews D, Preece J. Non-public and public online community participation: needs, attitudes and behavior. Electron Commer Res. 2006;6(1):7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paccagnella L. Getting the seats of your pants dirty: strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. J Comput Mediat Commun. 1997;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00065.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paechter C. Researching sensitive issues online: implications of a hybrid insider/outsider position in a retrospective ethnographic study. Qual Res. 2012;13(1):71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandlin JA. Netnography as a consumer education research tool. Int J Consum Stud. 2007;31(3):288–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap R. The words that took us there: ethnography in virtual ethnography. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serry T, Liamputtong P. Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis (CAQDAS). In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 437–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith ACT, Stewart B. Body perceptions and health behaviors in an online bodybuilding community. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(7):971–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart K. Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. Qual Res. 2005;5(4):395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther J. Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: human subjects issues and methodological myopia, vol. 4 (pp. 205–216). 2002. http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_wal_full.html: Ethics Information Technology.

  • Welsh E. Dealing with data: using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum Qual Social Res Sozialforschung. 2002;3(2), Art. 26. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/865/1880. Accessed 18 Apr 2015.

  • Zimmer M. “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics Inf Technol. 2010;12:313–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge the receipt of the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Stephanie T. Jong

Authors
  1. Stephanie T. Jong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie T. Jong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jong, S.T. (2019). Netnography: Researching Online Populations. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation