Skip to main content

Urban Ecologies in Transition: Contestations around Waste in Mumbai

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Urbanization in India

Part of the book series: Exploring Urban Change in South Asia ((EUCS))

  • 581 Accesses

Abstract

The paper interrogates the nature of rapid transitions of urban space in a country like India using a case study of a dumping ground located at Kanjurmarg in Mumbai. The land in question was a dense mangrove wetland which was speculatively reclaimed for a landfill. It looks at the protests and contestations around the site to raise questions on the nature of transitions of urban green spaces and explores how human–nature interactions are shaped by politics of development. Inequalities resulting from differential distribution and partial access of urban landscape/resources involving various actors, particularly the state and from micro political processes are explored. It draws from responses of actors and gaps in governance to understand the larger debate around urban social and environmental justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India, on February 19, 1991 and revised on January 6, 2011 for the purpose of protecting coastal resources from depletion and degradation and to manage developmental activities along the coastline, issued the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification in 1991 under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. This notification declared the coastal stretches of seas, bays, estuaries, creeks, rivers and backwaters influenced by tidal action up to 500 m from the ‘High Tide Line’ (“HTL”) and land between ‘Low Tide Line’ (“LTL”) and the HTL as the Coastal Regulation Zones (CRZs). Restrictions were imposed on developmental activities and the notification would regulate the use of land within 500 m of the coast and 100 m along the tidal-influenced water bodies. CRZ is divided into I, II, III with I being the most sensitive and rich in biodiversity.

  2. 2.

    India is a signatory to Ramsar Convention on Wetlands signed in Ramsar, Iran, in 1971, is an intergovernmental treaty which provides the framework for national action and international cooperation for the conservation and wise use of wetlands and their resources. It also lists wetlands of international importance (www.ramsar.org).

  3. 3.

    The National Green Tribunal has been established on 18.10.2010 under the National Green Tribunal Act 2010 for effective and expeditious disposal of cases relating to environmental protection and conservation of forests and other natural resources including enforcement of any legal right relating to environment (www.greentribunal.gov.in).

  4. 4.

    Swachh Bharat Mission translates to Clean India Mission in English. It was launched on October 2, 2014 as a nationwide call to clean India and improve hygiene by building toilets to eradicate open defecation. The cleaning drive was started by Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi which gained immediate momentum. One of the mission objectives is to ‘Introduce modern and scientific municipal solid waste management practices’ by 2019.

  5. 5.

    As per CRZ Notification 2011, under section 3, sub section (V) prohibits discharge of untreated waste and effluents from industries, cities or towns and other human settlements.

  6. 6.

    Steven Lukes gives three-dimensional view of power, the first deals with the most visible forms of power, for example decision-making by the state. The second-dimensional view of power talks about the act of decision-making as well as non-decision-making, for example the act of ignoring or not responding to grievances. In the third dimensional view of power Lukes includes forms of power which are not observable ‘invisible power’, like the deliberate attempts of the powerful to manipulate thoughts of the powerless. The powerless are often not even aware that they are being subjected to manipulation and this is done to prevent formation of grievances.

References

  • Annepu, R. K. (2012). Sustainable solid waste management in India. New York: Columbia University Earth Engineering Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baud, I., & De Wit, J. (2008). New forms of urban governance in India: shifts, models, networks and contestations. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baud, I. S., & Dhanalakshmi, R. (2008). Governance in urban environmental management: Comparing accountability and performance in multi-stakeholder arrangements in South India. In I. S. Baud & J. D. Wit (Eds.), New forms of urban governance in India (pp. 146–176). New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baviskar, A., & Ray, R. (2011). The elite and everyman: The cultural politics of Indian middle class. New Delhi: Routledge India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D. (1993). Race and environmental justice in the United States. The Yale Journal of International Law, 319–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D., & Johnson, G. S. (2000). Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, P. (2006). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world, Leonard Hastings Schoff Lectures edition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corporation, K. M. (2005). Project Management Unit Kolkata Environmental Improvement Project—Master plan on waste management. Kolkata: Kolkata Environmental Improvement Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S., & Bhattacharyya, B. K. (2013). Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Kolkata, India. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(2), 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (n.d). Solid waste management and debris recycling. In The Bombay Community Public Trust (Ed.) Understanding our civic issues: SWM in Mumbai. Mumbai: The Bombay Community Public Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughlas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ficci. (2009). Survey on the current status of municipal solid waste management in Indian cities and the potential of landfill gas to energy projects in India. New Delhi: Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forests, M. o. (2009, March 17). Environmental clearance. Retrieved August 21, 2013, from Environment Clearance, Government of India, Letter No. 10-10/2007-IA-III: http://environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Form-1A/EC/0_0_26_Sep_2013_16320868316-14-2009.pdf.

  • GOI, G. o. (2011, January). Coastal regulation zone notification. Retrieved March 17, 2014, from Ministry of Environment and Forests: http://www.moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/CRZ-Notification-2011.pdf.

  • Ghertner, D. A. (2011). Rule by aesthetics: World class city making in Delhi. In A. Roy & A. Ong (Eds.), Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 279–307). New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ghertner, D. A. (2012). Nuisance talk and the propriety of property: Middle class discourses of a slum-free Delhi. Antipode, 44(4), 1161–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOI, G. o. (n.d.). Ministry of Home Affairs. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from Census of India 2011: http://censusindia.gov.in/.

  • Gupta, D. (2007). Mistaken modernity: India between worlds. New York: Haper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J. (2005). Political participation, representation and the urban poor: Findings from research in Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(11), 1041–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoornweg, D., Bhada-Tata, P., & Kennedy, C. (2013). Environment: Waste production must peak this century nature. Nature Archive, 502(7473), 615–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • India, M. o.-G. (2014, October 2). Swachh Bharat Mission. Retrieved October 5, 2014, from Swachh Bharat Urban: https://swachhbharaturban.gov.in/writereaddata/Mission_objective.pdf.

  • Joshi, M., Patil, S. B., & Mourya, K. (2013). Solid waste management on dumping ground in Mumbai region—A study. In International Conference on Green Computing and Technology (pp. 18–22). International Journal of Computer Applications (0975–8887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaujalgi, S. G. (2010, September). Thesis titled Introducing Mangrove Mitigation to the Urban Development in Mumbai. Retrieved December 14, 2015, from Virginia Tech Digital Library and Archives: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12202010-013329/unrestricted/Kaujali_S_T_2010.pdf.

  • Kaviraj, S. (1997). Filth and the Public Sphere: Concepts and practices about Space in Calcutta. Public Culture, 10(1), 83–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd edn.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukose, A., & Khan, A. (2014, April 18). Court stays NGT order on Kanjurmarg dumping ground. Mumbai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, M. (1987). Dirt and development in India. Virginia Quaterly Review, 63, 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Green Tribunal, G. o. (2014, February 12). National green tribunal. Retrieved November 8, 2015, from NGT Western Zone Bench: http://www.greentribunal.gov.in/orderinpdf/1-2014(WZ)(Ap)_12Feb2014.pdf.

  • Pinto, R. (2016, January 7). BMC seeks nod to use CRZ land as dump. Retrieved January 8, 2016, from The Times of India, City Mumbai: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/BMC-seeks-nod-to-use-CRZ-land-as-dump/articleshow/50474756.cms.

  • Roy, A. (2004). The Gentlemans city: Urban informality in the Calcutta of New Communism. In A. Roy & N. AlSayyad (Eds.), Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia (pp. 147–170). Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, A. K. (2007). Present scenario of municipal solid waste (MSW) dumping grounds in India. In International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management (pp. 327–333), Chennai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. N. (2014, August 5). SC upholds HC order on demolition of 12-ft wall around Kanjurmarg dump. Retrieved October 6, 2014, from The Indian Express. http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/sc-upholds-hc-order-on-demolition-of-12-ft-wall-around-kanjurmarg-dump/.

  • Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G., & Trivedi, R. (2008). Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities—A review. Waste Management, 459–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. P. (2008). The challenge of good governance in India: Need for innovative approaches. In Second International Conference of the Global Network of Global Innovators organized by Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation and John F. Kennedy School of Government. Massachusetts: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. (2012). Changing contours of solid waste management in India. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 5(3), 333–342. doi:10.1080/17516234.2012.731172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B., & Parthasarthy, D. (2010). Civil Society organization partnerships in urban governance: An appraisal of the Mumbai experience. Sociological Bulletin, 59(1), 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2006). People’s participation in urban governance: A comparative study of working ward committees in Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra and West Bengal. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribunal, N. G. (2014, February 6). Green tribunal, Government of India. Retrieved July 18, 2015, from NGT Western Bench: http://www.greentribunal.gov.in/Writereaddata/Downloads/1-2013(wz)(Ap)_6Feb2014.pdf.

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social affairs. (2014). World urbanizing prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights. United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2004). Towards a repoliticization of participatory development: Political capabilities and spaces of empowerment. In S. Hickey & G. Mohan (Eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development (pp. 92–107). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125(May), 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sneha Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharma, S., Parthasarathy, D. (2018). Urban Ecologies in Transition: Contestations around Waste in Mumbai. In: Mukherjee, J. (eds) Sustainable Urbanization in India. Exploring Urban Change in South Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4932-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4932-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4931-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4932-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics