Skip to main content

Literature Review of Readiness for Change in Ethiopia: In Theory One Thing; In Reality Another

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management Challenges in Different Types of African Firms

Part of the book series: Frontiers in African Business Research ((FABR))

Abstract

Readiness for change is defined as a cognitive precursor to resistance or as a support for a change effort. The main objective of this literature review is to explore readiness for change at the individual and organizational levels. It reviews publications to trace readiness for change. It provides a picture of the concept of readiness for change, explores and identifies the relationships between the readiness for change , individual change , and organizational change and the challenges of change. Dealing with the complex nature of change is the greatest challenge when following through and sustaining a change initiative. Leaning on institutional theory , it contextualizes the concept of readiness for change in Ethiopia .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R.A. 1974. Redesigning the future: A systems approach to societal problems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agboola, A.A., and R.O. Salawu. 2011. Managing deviant behavior and resistance to change. International Journal of Business and Management 6 (1): 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amis, J.M., and R. Aissaoui. 2013. Readiness for change: An institutional perspective. Journal of Change Management 13 (1): 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anshel, M.H. 1996. Coping styles among adolescent competitive athletes. Journal of Social Psychology 136: 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacopolou, E. 1998. Developing learning managers within learning organizations. In Organizational learning and the learning organization: Developments in theory and practice, eds. M. Easterby-Smith, L. Araujo, and J. Burgoiyne, 214–242. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A.A., and A.G. Bedeian. 1999. Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management 25 (3): 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A.A., and S.G. Harris. 2002. Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management 15: 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., S. Harris, and K. Mossholder. 1993. Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations 46: 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A.A., S.G. Harris, and H.S. Feild. 1999. Making change permanent: a model for institutionalizing change interventions. In Research in organizational change and development, ed. W. Passmore, and R. Woodman, 289–319. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. 2009. Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice, 11th edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 37: 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M., and N. Nohria. 2000. Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review 78: 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M., R.A. Eisenstat, and B. Spector 1990. Why change programs do not produce change. Harvard Business Review. Nov–Dec 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • California State. 2014. Organizational change management: Readiness guide, Version 1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinite, I., L.E. Duxbury, and C. Higgins. 2009. Measurement of perceived organizational readiness for change in the public sector. British Journal of Management 20: 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, K. 1996. 9 ways to create an atmosphere of change. Human Resource Magazine 41 (10): 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F. 1999. Management challenges for the 21st century. New York: Harper business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., and R.S. Lazarus. 1980. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 21: 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., and R.S. Lazarus. 1988. Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 466–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, L.D., and W.W. Burke. 1995. Creating successful organization change. In Managing organizational change, eds. W.W. Burke, 7–9. New York: American Management Association (AMACOM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby. 2008. The Sage handbook of institutionalism, 1–47. SAGE publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S.E., and R.S. Schuler. 1995. Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. New York University: Department of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jex, S.M., P.D. Bliese, S. Buzzell, and J. Primeau. 2001. The impact of self-efficacy on stressor-strain relations: Coping style as an explanatory mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M. 1993. The reproduction of inertia in multinational corporations. In Organization theory and the multinational corporation, ed. S. Ghoshal, and D.E. Westney, 259–274. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kilman, R.H. 1984. Beyond the quick fix. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, E. 2003. The psychology of change management. McKinsey Quarterly 2: 1–8. Available at: www.mckinseyquarterly.com

  • Lazarus, R., and S. Folkman. 1985. If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 150–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S., and S. Folkman. 1987. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality 1: 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S., and R. Launier. 1978. Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In Perspectives in interactional psychology, ed. L.A. Pervin, and M. Lewis, 287–327. New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. 1945. Conduct, knowledge, and acceptance of new values. In Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science, ed. K. Lewin, 48–55. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83: 440–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, O. 2013. Change leadership: Developing a change-adept organization. Development and Learning in Organizations, An International Journal. 27(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J.O., W.F. Velicer, J.S. Rossi, M.G. Goldstein, B.H. Marcus, and W.L. Rakowski. 1994. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology 13: 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.H., and W. Bennis. 1965. Personal and organizational change via group methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. 1996. Institutionalism “old” and “new”. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1945. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I. 2005. Achieving readiness for organizational change. Library Management 26 (6/7): 408–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walinga, J. 2008. Toward a theory of change readiness. The roles of appraisal, focus, and perceived control. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 44 (3): 315–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, M., and H. Hacker. 2005. Why change fails: Knowledge counts. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal 26: 400–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J., H. Amick, and Y. Lee. 2008. Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: A review of the literature in health services research and other fields’. Medical Care Research and Review 65: 379–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J., A. Lewis, and A. Linnan. 2009. Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. Health Education Research 24: 292–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L.G. 1983. Organizations as institutions. Research in the sociology of organizations, 21–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ermias Werkilul Asfaw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asfaw, E.W. (2017). Literature Review of Readiness for Change in Ethiopia: In Theory One Thing; In Reality Another. In: Achtenhagen, L., Brundin, E. (eds) Management Challenges in Different Types of African Firms. Frontiers in African Business Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4536-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics