Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the pedagogies of English as a second language (ESL) and music for cross-disciplinary connection and cross-disciplinary integration. The scope of the study focused on one selected pedagogical problem from each discipline: (1) supra-segmental pronunciation from ESL and (2) rhythmic literacy from music. The study examined trends in ESL pedagogy utilizing musical rhythm to teach supra-segmental pronunciation, trends in music pedagogy utilizing language to teach rhythmic literacy, and trends to integrate the two disciplines. The study established that there is a cross-disciplinary connection in a compartmentalized context and provided a foundation for subsequent research in cross-disciplinary integration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Bebeau, M. (1982). Effects of traditional and simplified methods of rhythm reading instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30(2), 107–119.
Chela-Flores, B. (2001). Pronunciation and language learning: An integrative approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 39(2), 85–101.
Chen, C., Fan, C., & Lin, H. (1999). A new perspective on teaching English pronunciation: Rhythm. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED397638.pdf. Last accessed June 1, 2016.
Cole, J. (2008). A brief comparison of rhythm pedagogy systems. The Orff Echo, 40(2), 25–28.
Colley, B. (1987). A comparison of syllabic methods for improving rhythm literacy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35(4), 221–235.
Crystal, D. (1980). A first dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. London: André Deutsch.
Gamba, S. (2016). Rhythmic projections: Rhythm exercise for building mastery. Boca Raton, FL: Ludwig-Masters Publications.
Gilbert, J. B. (2010). Clear speech: Pronunciation and listening comprehension in North American English (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gilpatrick, L. (2009). Orff Schulwerk: Process, not method. The Orff Echo, 41(4), 24–26.
Jackson, C., & O’Brien, M. (2011). The interaction between prosody and meaning in second language speech production. Teaching German, 44(1), 1–11.
Strouse, L. (2007). Improving rhythm reading in middle school band. Teaching Music, 14(5), 34–39.
Suzuki, S. (2007). Suzuki Violin School (Violin Part, Vol. 1, Revised Edition). Miami, FL: Summy-Birchard Music.
Taub, G., McGraw, K., & Keith, T. (2007). Improvements in interval time tracking and effects on reading achievement. Psychology in Schools, 44(8), 849–863.
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of second language speck: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five supra-segmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 251–276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Whitley, R. (2017). Examination of the Cross-Disciplinary Connection and Cross-Disciplinary Integration of ESL and Music Pedagogies. In: Teh, G., Choy, S. (eds) Empowering 21st Century Learners Through Holistic and Enterprising Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4241-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4241-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4240-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4241-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)