Skip to main content

Hydrocarbon Fire and Explosion’s Safety Aspects to Avoid Accident Escalation for Offshore Platform

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICIPEG 2016

Abstract

Offshore platforms are never 100% secure from fire hazard despite of using advanced technology. Hydrocarbon fire and explosion accidents are among commonly reported incidents in the oil and gas process-related activities. In April, 2015, PEMEX-operated oil platform caught fire—45 injured and four died. Accidents such as Piper Alpha have recorded greatest loss of human live on offshore platform in history. A total of 167 persons perished victim of the tragedy confluence of design flows, human error, and bad luck. Saving lives and property in such disaster is extremely a challenging job for engineers. Hydrocarbon fire and explosion produce extreme pressure and temperature, which cause fatalities and structural damages at large scale within a fraction of time. The experimental studies are restricted due to limited facilities available for fire and explosion testing for offshore structure. In previous studies, individual structure member was tested, which cannot represent the behaviour of the entire structure. Therefore, structural safety is always being a main issue to prevent property damage or least-obtained safe evacuation before structural collapse. To understanding the behaviour of structural modelling techniques allow to study the possible behaviour of the platform. These techniques entirely depend on personal experience and modelling practice adopted in oil and gas sector. Therefore, simulation should be verified by a full-scale experimental study on combined structural members. The standard experimental studies should be conducted and data should be easily available after testing for validation for future simulation and to overcome lack of date issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Rajendram, F. Khan, and V. Garaniya, “Modelling of Fire Risks in an Offshore Facility,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 71, pp. 79–85, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. H. Vervalin, “Fire Protection Manual for Hydrocarbon Processing Plants,” 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. T. Paterson, Offshore fire safety: Pennwell Corp, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. K. Paik and A. K. Thayamballi, Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations: Design, Building, and Operation: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Lord, A. Luketa, C. Wocken, S. Schlasner, T. Aulich, R. Allen, et al., “Literature Survey of Crude Oil Properties Relevant to Handling and Fire Safety in Transport,” Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States) 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Imran, M. S. Liew, and M. S. Nasif, “Experimental Studies on Fire for Offshore Structures and its Limitation: A Review,” Chemical Engineering Transactions, vol. 45, pp. 1951–1956, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte, “Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 96, pp. 925–932, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. I. Khan and S. Abbasi, “Major Accidents in Process Industries and an Analysis of Causes and Consequences,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the process Industries, vol. 12, pp. 361–378, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. OGP’s, “OGP Risk Assessment Data Directory,” International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, England2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Haidar. (2015, The 10 Biggest Oil Spills In World History - 3 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Available: http://www.oilandgasiq.com/integrity-hse-maintenance/articles/the-10-biggest-oil-spills-in-world-history-part-8/.

  11. M. Dadashzadeh, F. Khan, K. Hawboldt, and P. Amyotte, “An integrated approach for fire and explosion consequence modelling,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 61, pp. 324–337, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Dadashzadeh, R. Abbassi, F. Khan, and K. Hawboldt, “Explosion Modeling and Analysis of BP Deepwater Horizon Accident,” Safety science, vol. 57, pp. 150–160, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Brandsæter, “Risk Assessment in the Offshore Industry,” Safety Science, vol. 40, pp. 231–269, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. I. Khan, R. Sadiq, and T. Husain, “Risk-Based Process Safety Assessment and Control Measures Design for Offshore Process Facilities,” Journal of hazardous materials, vol. 94, pp. 1–36, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Jerzy and J. K. Paik, “Paradigm Change in Safety Design Against Hydrocarbon Explosions and Fires,” in FABIG Newsletter, SCI, Issue 60,, ed, 2012, pp. 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Pan and L. A. Louca, “Experimental and numerical studies on the response of stiffened plates subjected to gas explosions,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 52, pp. 171–193, 11// 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Paik, J. Czujko, J. H. Kim, Sung In Park, MD Shafiqul Islam, and D. H. Lee, “A New Procedure for the Nonlinear Structural Response Analysis of Offshore Installations in Fires,” Transactions SNAME, vol. Vol. 121, 2013, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. REUTERS, “Accident Aboard Pemex Jack-Up Kills Two, Injures 10” in Maritime News Today, ed, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reuters, “Fire Out at Pemex Processing Platform,” in gCaptain, ed, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Vinnem, R. Bye, B. Gran, T. Kongsvik, O. Nyheim, E. Okstad, et al., “Risk Modelling of Maintenance Work on Major Process Equipment on Offshore Petroleum Installations,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 25, pp. 274–292, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. E. Paté‐Cornell, “Learning from the Piper Alpha Accident: A Postmortem Analysis of Technical and Organizational Factors,” Risk Analysis, vol. 13, pp. 215–232, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Drysdale and R. Sylvester-Evans, “The Explosion and Fire on the Piper Alpha Platform, 6 July 1988. A Case Study,” Philosophical Transactions Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 356, pp. 2929–2951, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Hart. (2010, 14/Feburay). Montara Oil Spill: “A Failure of Sensible Oilfield Practice”. Available: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/7193.

  24. J. Paik and J. Czujko, “Explosion and Fire Engineering of FPSOs (EFEF JIP): Definition of Design Fire Loads,” FABIG Newsletter, pp. 15–28, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. K. Paik and J. Czujko, “Assessment of Hydrocarbon Explosion and Fire Risks in Offshore Installations: Recent Advances and Future Trends,” The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 167–179, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Y. Jin and B. S. Jang, “Study on the Probabilistic Scenario Based Fire Risk Analysis of FPSO Topside Module,” in ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2014, pp. V04BT02A007-V04BT02A007.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Promat. (2014, 05–03–15). Fire Curves. Available: http://www.promat-tunnel.com/en/advices/fire-protection/fire%20curves.

  28. C. International. PFP Systems [Online]. Available: http://www.pfpsystems.com/assets/Uploads/HydrocarbonBook1.pdf.

  29. W. Yu, J. Zhao, H. Luo, J. Shi, and D. Zhang, “Experimental Study on Mechanical Behavior of an Impacted Steel Tubular T-joint in Fire,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 67, pp. 1376–1385, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Jin, J. Zhao, M. Liu, and J. Chang, “Parametric Analysis of Mechanical Behavior of Steel Planar Tubular Truss under Fire,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 67, pp. 75–83, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. K. Zipf and K. Cashdollar, “Effects of blast pressure on structures and the human body,” National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  32. API, “API RP2A-WSD: Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms–Working Stress Design,” in Twenty, ed, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Imran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Imran, M., Liew, M.S., Nasif, M.S., Niazi, U.M., Yasreen, A. (2017). Hydrocarbon Fire and Explosion’s Safety Aspects to Avoid Accident Escalation for Offshore Platform. In: Awang, M., Negash, B., Md Akhir, N., Lubis, L., Md. Rafek, A. (eds) ICIPEG 2016. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3650-7_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3650-7_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3649-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3650-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics