Skip to main content

Towards a Critical Curriculum for Engagement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Student Engagement in Neoliberal Times

Abstract

What is a critical curriculum for engagement? Such a curriculum overlaps with the prescriptions of a mainstream curriculum but takes learning beyond this. A critical curriculum includes all relevant purposes, knowledge and values leading to awareness of self, society and the ecosystem. It enables  critique of mainstream knowledge, values and practices and works for greater social justice. The chapter introduces the notion of a ‘big E’ critical curriculum , which features student engagement as a catalyst for critical learning. While theoretical supports for a ‘big E’ critical curriculum are canvassed, so are practical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allman, P. (2010). Critical education against global capitalism. Karl Marx and revolutionary critical education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2012). Introduction. In M. Au (Ed.), Critical curriculum studies: Education, consciousness and the politics of knowing (pp. xii–xv). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Au, M. (2012). Critical curriculum studies: Education, consciousness and the politics of knowing. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 429–440. doi:10.1080/03075070902771978

  • Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1998). Understanding the futures field. In D. Hicks & R. Slaughter (Eds.), Futures education: World yearbook of education. London, UK: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London, UK: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. London, UK: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brameld, T. (1965/2000). Education as power: A re-issue by the Society of Educational Reconstruction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2000). The concept of critically reflective practice. In A. Wilson & E. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 33–50). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2005). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2013). Powerful techniques for teaching adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S., & Holst, J. (2011). Radicalizing learning: Adult education for a just world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R., & Wilson, A. (2001). Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, B. (2002). Audit, accountability, quality and all that: The growth of managerial technologies in UK universities. In S. Prickett & P. Erskine-Hill (Eds.), Education! Education! Education! Managerial ethics and the law of unintended consequences (pp. 18–28). Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, S. (2011). Critical thinking skills: Developing effective analysis and argument (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeley, S. (2015). Critical perspectives on service-learning in higher education. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1967/1978). Of grammatology (G. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Door, V. (2014). Critical pedagogy and reflexivity: The issue of ethical consistency. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 5(2), 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A. (2002). Educating for real and hoped for political words: Ways forward in developing political literacy. Retrieved from http://www.citized.info/?r_menu=res_art&strand=4

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests (J. Shapiro, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, J., & Taylor, M. (2000). Learning and teaching about values: A review of recent research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 169–202. doi:10.1080/713657146

  • Hooks, B. (1994/2006). Outlaw culture: Resisting representations. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella, E. (2006). Hermeneutics and critical hermeneutics: Exploring possibilities within the art of interpretation. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/145

  • Kuhn, T. (1999). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, B. (2015). Pedagogical pathways for Indigenous education with/in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, M., & Munns, G. (2002). Student engagement and the social relations of pedagogy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messenger, H. (2015). The identification of a value-based pedagogical pattern promoting ‘development of the person’ in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(7), 738–749. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1069267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1992). Unended quest: An intellectual autobiography. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M. (2011). Whatever happened to curriculum theory? Critical realism and curriculum change. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., & Callender, C. (2014). Review of the national student survey: Appendix A: Literature review. Retrieved from London, UK: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/year/2014/nssreview/#alldownloads

  • Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK; Dunedin, New Zealand: Zed Books and University of Otago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2005). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 85–108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voros, J. (2003). The generic foresight process: Expanding the frame of futures enquiry and practice. Paper presented at the Professional Development Forum, Australian Foresight Institute, Swinburn Institute of Technology, 11 November. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/40020

  • Yates, L. (2009). From curriculum to pedagogy and back again: Knowledge, the person and the changing world. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (2014). What is a curriculum and what can it do? The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 7–13. doi:10.1080/09585176.2014.902526

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Zepke .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zepke, N. (2017). Towards a Critical Curriculum for Engagement. In: Student Engagement in Neoliberal Times. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3200-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3200-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3198-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3200-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics