Abstract
What is a critical curriculum for engagement? Such a curriculum overlaps with the prescriptions of a mainstream curriculum but takes learning beyond this. A critical curriculum includes all relevant purposes, knowledge and values leading to awareness of self, society and the ecosystem. It enables critique of mainstream knowledge, values and practices and works for greater social justice. The chapter introduces the notion of a ‘big E’ critical curriculum , which features student engagement as a catalyst for critical learning. While theoretical supports for a ‘big E’ critical curriculum are canvassed, so are practical applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allman, P. (2010). Critical education against global capitalism. Karl Marx and revolutionary critical education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Apple, M. (2012). Introduction. In M. Au (Ed.), Critical curriculum studies: Education, consciousness and the politics of knowing (pp. xii–xv). New York, NY: Routledge.
Au, M. (2012). Critical curriculum studies: Education, consciousness and the politics of knowing. New York, NY: Routledge.
Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 429–440. doi:10.1080/03075070902771978
Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Bell, W. (1998). Understanding the futures field. In D. Hicks & R. Slaughter (Eds.), Futures education: World yearbook of education. London, UK: Kogan Page.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. London, UK: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 175–192.
Brameld, T. (1965/2000). Education as power: A re-issue by the Society of Educational Reconstruction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.
Brookfield, S. (2000). The concept of critically reflective practice. In A. Wilson & E. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 33–50). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Brookfield, S. (2005). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Brookfield, S. (2013). Powerful techniques for teaching adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Brookfield, S., & Holst, J. (2011). Radicalizing learning: Adult education for a just world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Cervero, R., & Wilson, A. (2001). Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Charlton, B. (2002). Audit, accountability, quality and all that: The growth of managerial technologies in UK universities. In S. Prickett & P. Erskine-Hill (Eds.), Education! Education! Education! Managerial ethics and the law of unintended consequences (pp. 18–28). Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.
Cottrell, S. (2011). Critical thinking skills: Developing effective analysis and argument (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Deeley, S. (2015). Critical perspectives on service-learning in higher education. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Derrida, J. (1967/1978). Of grammatology (G. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Door, V. (2014). Critical pedagogy and reflexivity: The issue of ethical consistency. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 5(2), 88–99.
Douglas, A. (2002). Educating for real and hoped for political words: Ways forward in developing political literacy. Retrieved from http://www.citized.info/?r_menu=res_art&strand=4
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests (J. Shapiro, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
Halstead, J., & Taylor, M. (2000). Learning and teaching about values: A review of recent research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 169–202. doi:10.1080/713657146
Hooks, B. (1994/2006). Outlaw culture: Resisting representations. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kinsella, E. (2006). Hermeneutics and critical hermeneutics: Exploring possibilities within the art of interpretation. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/145
Kuhn, T. (1999). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Madden, B. (2015). Pedagogical pathways for Indigenous education with/in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.005
McFadden, M., & Munns, G. (2002). Student engagement and the social relations of pedagogy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 357–366.
Messenger, H. (2015). The identification of a value-based pedagogical pattern promoting ‘development of the person’ in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(7), 738–749. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1069267
Popper, K. (1992). Unended quest: An intellectual autobiography. London, UK: Routledge.
Priestley, M. (2011). Whatever happened to curriculum theory? Critical realism and curriculum change. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 221–237.
Ramsden, P., & Callender, C. (2014). Review of the national student survey: Appendix A: Literature review. Retrieved from London, UK: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/year/2014/nssreview/#alldownloads
Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK; Dunedin, New Zealand: Zed Books and University of Otago Press.
Smith, L. (2005). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 85–108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Voros, J. (2003). The generic foresight process: Expanding the frame of futures enquiry and practice. Paper presented at the Professional Development Forum, Australian Foresight Institute, Swinburn Institute of Technology, 11 November. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/40020
Yates, L. (2009). From curriculum to pedagogy and back again: Knowledge, the person and the changing world. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(1), 17–28.
Young, M. (2014). What is a curriculum and what can it do? The Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 7–13. doi:10.1080/09585176.2014.902526
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zepke, N. (2017). Towards a Critical Curriculum for Engagement. In: Student Engagement in Neoliberal Times. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3200-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3200-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3198-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3200-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)