Skip to main content

The Psychometric Properties of the Individual-Oriented Achievement Motivation Scale-Short Form (IOAMS-SF): By Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Item Response Theory (IRT)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applied Psychology Readings (SCAP 2016)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 879 Accesses

Abstract

The Individual-Oriented Achievement Motivation Scale (IOAMS; Yang and Yu in Social- and individual-oriented achievement motives: conceptualization and measurement, 1988) is a reliable and valid measurement tool assessing an individual’s individual-oriented achievement motivation (IOAM). IOAM exhibits a functionally automatized (hence still intrinsic) desire via which the process of achievement-related behaviours, standards of excellence, and evaluation of performance or outcome are perceived and determined by an individual oneself. The IOAMS (Yang and Yu 1988) is a reliable and valid measurement tool assessing an individual’s IOAM. Chang et al. (J Psychol Chin Soc 1(2):39–63, 2000) found that IOAMS consisted of a sole single-order factor using varimax rotation method. Chang’s et al. research was conducted in Singapore, there may be cultural differences between Singaporean and Hong Kong’s contexts. Furthermore, varimax rotation method is for exploratory purpose for investigating the factorial structure of the IOAMS. Since the current study targeted at Hong Kong individuals, the present study addressed the issue of cultural difference. Furthermore, in the current study, a confirmatory approach was employed to examine the factorial structure of IOAMS. Hence, the IOAMS was reexamined in Hong Kong context. With confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory, the 30-item IOAMS was condensed to become a 12-item IOAMS-Short Form (IOAMS-SF).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El-Fattah, S. M., & Patrick, R. R. (2011). The relationship among achievement motivation orientations, achievement goals and academic achievement and interest: A multiple mediation analysis. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 11, 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913–933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W. N. C., Wong, W. K., & Teo, G. (2000). The socially oriented and individually oriented achievement motivation of Singaporean Chinese students. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1(2), 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chui, W. Y., & Leung, M. T. (2016). Adult attachment internal working model of self and other in Chinese culture: Measured by the Attachment Style Questionnaire-Short Form (ASQ-SF) by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT). Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui, W. Y., Lee, S. K., & Tsang, C. K. (2016). Father involvement in Hong Kong: By multitrait–multimethod model and item response theory (IRT). Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes in development: Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. F., Kallen, M. A., & Amtamann, D. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Quality of Life Research, 18, 447–460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. F., Teal, C. R., Bjorner, J. B., Cella, D., Chang, C. H., Crane, P. K., et al. (2007). IRT health outcomes data analysis project: An overview and summary. Quality of Life Research, 16(Suppl 1), 121–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (2001). Improving test quality in the Netherlands: Results of 18 years of test ratings. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, F., Senécal, C., Gautheir, L., & Fernet, C. (2003). Predicting career indecision: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 50(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications (Vol. 7). USA: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., & Chen, C. (2014). The role of the built environment on perceived safety from crime and walking: Examining direct and indirect impacts. Transportation, 41, 1171–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the overjustification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A., Bang, J. T., & Wunnava, P. V. (2014). Financial liberalization and the selection of emigrants: A cross-national analysis. Empirical Economics, 47, 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modelling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42(3), 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, P., Torres, L. R., Cunningham-Williams, R. M., Woods, C., & Unick, G. J. (2011). Differential item functioning of pathological gambling criteria: An examination of gender, race/ethnicity and age. Journal of Gambling Study, 27, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17. Richmond, VA: Psychometric Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toland, M. D. (2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. S., & Yu, A. B. (1988). Social- and individual-oriented achievement motives: Conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the symposium on Chinese personality and social psychology for the XXIVth international congress of psychology. Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction o metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 954–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wing-Yip Chui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: The Individual-Oriented Achievement Motivation Scale-Short Form (IOAM-SF)

Appendix: The Individual-Oriented Achievement Motivation Scale-Short Form (IOAM-SF)

Persistence

  1. 1.

    While working, I always keep on trying until I am satisfied.

  2. 2.

    I am willing to constantly working hard in order to reach personal success.

  3. 3.

    I usually examine my own performance in an examination, when I do not have the test results, in order to improve myself.

Self-reflection

  1. 1.

    No matter how difficult the task is, I would try my best to do it, if I think it is worthwhile to do.

  2. 2.

    No matter what other people might think, I will try my best to do what I consider valuable.

  3. 3.

    To attain high level of education is glorification of my ancestors but for my own knowledge and interests.

Inherent values

  1. 1.

    I usually think whether my present performance has reached my own standards.

  2. 2.

    I get satisfaction from completing jobs; the reward that comes with it is secondary to me.

  3. 3.

    I usually follow my own studying methods in order to obtain better marks.

Success awareness

  1. 1.

    Even if no one were around, I would still complete whatever I started.

  2. 2.

    I am very clear about how much effort to put in a job in order to reach my goals.

  3. 3.

    After finishing a job, I can usually judge what my performance might be.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chui, WY., Leung, MT. (2016). The Psychometric Properties of the Individual-Oriented Achievement Motivation Scale-Short Form (IOAMS-SF): By Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Item Response Theory (IRT). In: Leung, MT., Tan, L. (eds) Applied Psychology Readings. SCAP 2016. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2796-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics