Skip to main content

Modeling Trends in Solid and Hazardous Waste Management

The Change from Aerobic to Anaerobic Land Filling and the Increase of Correspondent Emissions and Expenses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the main policy to waste management destination, considering the immediate sanitation concern in developing countries. From the analysis of literature and many waste management projects presented for United Nation registration as clean development mechanism (CDM), we draw some deductions. Because of the regulatory shortcomings and pitfalls; landfill sites configuration from aerobic unmanaged to anaerobic managed; poor administrative activity; and the increase of costs and the capital shortage, the change can lead to a greater overall GHG emission. Thus, the recent studies and the world reports about this issue indicate the regulatory environment as the first bottleneck to be aware of to alleviate the initiatives barriers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allesch A, Brunner PH (2014) Assessment methods for solid waste management: a literature review. Waste Manag Res 32:461–473. doi:10.1177/0734242X14535653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Yaqout AF, Hamoda MF (2002) Report: management problems of solid waste landfills in Kuwait. Waste Manag Res 20:328–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amini HR, Reinhart DR, Niskanen A (2013) Comparison of first-order-decay modeled and actual field measured municipal solid waste landfill methane data. Waste Manag 33:2720–2728. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen FM, Larsen H, Skovgaard M et al (2007) A European model for waste and material flows. Resour Conserv Recycl 49:421–435. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydi A, Abichou T, Zairi M, Sdiri A (2015) Assessment of electrical generation potential and viability of gas collection from fugitive emissions in a Tunisian landfill. Energy Strateg Rev 8:8–14. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2015.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartl A (2011) Barriers towards achieving a zero waste society. Waste Manag 31:2369–2370. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartl A (2014) Moving from recycling to waste prevention: a review of barriers and enables. Waste Manag Res 32:3–18. doi:10.1177/0734242X14541986

  • Barton JR, Issaias I, Stentiford EI (2008) Carbon–making the right choice for waste management in developing countries. Waste Manag 28:690–698. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batllevell M, Hanf K (2008) The fairness of PAYT systems: some guidelines for decision-makers. Waste Manag 28:2793–2800. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W, Oats W (1988) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleck D, Wettberg W (2012) Waste collection in developing countries–tackling occupational safety and health hazards at their source. Waste Manag 32:2009–2017. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasil (2010) LEI No 12.305, DE 2 DE AGOSTO DE 2010. Institui a Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos. Congresso Nacional

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner PH, Fellner J (2007) Setting priorities for waste management strategies in developing countries. Waste Manag Res 25:234–240. doi:10.1177/0734242X07078296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bufoni AL, Carvalho MS, Oliveira LB, Rosa LP (2014) The emerging issue of solid waste disposal sites emissions in developing countries: the case of Brazil. J Environ Prot (Irvine, Calif) 5:886–894. doi:10.4236/jep.2014.510090

  • Bufoni AL, Oliveira LB, Rosa LP (2015) The financial attractiveness assessment of large waste management projects registered as clean development mechanism. Waste Manag 43:497–508. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bufoni AL, Oliveira LB, Rosa LP (2016) The declared barriers of the large developing countries waste management projects: the STAR model. Waste Manage 52. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.023

  • Carvalho MS, Rosa LP, Bufoni AL, Ferreira AC de S (2011) The issue of sustainability and disclosure. a case study of selective garbage collection by the urban cleaning service of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil–COMLURB. Resour Conserv Recycl 1030–1038. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.015

  • Carvalho MS, Rosa LP, Bufoni AL, Oliveira LB (2012) Putting solid household waste to sustainable use: a case study in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Waste Manag Res

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung SS, Lo CWH (2008) Local waste management constraints and waste administrators in China. Waste Manag 28:272–281. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2006.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciplak N, Barton JR (2012) A system dynamics approach for healthcare waste management: a case study in Istanbul Metropolitan City, Turkey. Waste Manag Res 30:576–586. doi:10.1177/0734242X12443405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COP 10 (2011) BC-10/2: strategic framework for the implementation of the Basel Convention for 2012–2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Corselli-Nordblad L (2014) In 2012, 42 % of treated municipal waste was recycled or composted. Eurostat News Release 48–50

    Google Scholar 

  • DoBerl G, Huber R, Brunner PH et al (2002) Long-term assessment of waste management options—a new, integrated and goal-oriented approach. Waste Manag Res 20:311–327. doi:10.1177/0734247X0202000402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan SM, Pan Jilang, Bateson T et al (2011) Gas emissions from biodegradable waste in United Kingdom landfills. Waste Manag Res 29:69–76. doi:10.1177/0734242X10389510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M (2013) Towards a coherent European approach for taxation of combustible waste. Waste Manag 33:1776–1783. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echart J, Ghebremichael K, Khatri K, et al (2012) The future of water in African Cities : why waste water? Integrated Urban Water Management, Background Report

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Fadel M, Abi-Esber L, Salhab S (2012) Emission assessment at the Burj Hammoud inactive municipal landfill: viability of landfill gas recovery under the clean development mechanism. Waste Manag 32:2106–2114. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.12.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2011) Criteria for municipal solid waste landfills. Code of Federal Regulations, Environmental Protection Agency, Protection of Environment

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Bisaillon M (2011) Multiple system modelling of waste management. Waste Manag 31:2620–2630. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC on waste and repealing certain directives. European Parliament and of the Council

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Preparing a waste management plan

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015) Waste prevention programmes. http://scp.eionet.europa.eu/facts/WPP. Accessed 17 Dec 2015

  • European Environment Agency (2013) Managing municipal solid waste—a review of achievements in 32 European counties

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentil EC, Damgaard A, Hauschild M et al (2010) Models for waste life cycle assessment: review of technical assumptions. Waste Manag 30:2636–2648. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey L, Scott D, Trois C (2013) Caught between the global economy and local bureaucracy: the barriers to good waste management practice in South Africa. Waste Manag Res 31:295–305. doi:10.1177/0734242X12470204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero LA, Maas G, Hogland W (2013) Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag 33:220–232. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han H, Qian G, Long J, Li S (2009) Comparison of two different ways of landfill gas utilization through greenhouse gas emission reductions analysis and financial analysis. Waste Manag Res 27:922–927. doi:10.1177/0734242X09349762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan D, Srivastava S, Ramakrishna AS (2006) Improving management of municipal solid waste in India : overview and challenges

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste : a global review of solid waste management

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoornweg D, Giannelli N (2007) Managing municipal solid waste in latin America and the Caribbean : integrating the private sector. Harnessing Incentives

    Google Scholar 

  • Inanc B, Idris A, Terazono A, Sakai S (2004) Development of a database of landfills and dump sites in Asian countries. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. doi:10.1007/s10163-004-0116-z

  • IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol 5. Waste

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardooni R, Yusoff SB, Kari FB (2016) Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia. Energy Policy 88:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmperis AC, Aravossis K, Tatsiopoulos IP, Sotirchos A (2013) Decision support models for solid waste management: review and game-theoretic approaches. Waste Manag 33:1290–1301. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent A, Bakas I, Clavreul J et al (2014) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems–part I: lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manag 34:573–588. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljunggren M (2000) Modelling national solid waste management. Waste Manag Res 18:525–537. doi:10.1177/0734242X0001800603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohri CR, Camenzind EJ, Zurbrügg C (2014) Financial sustainability in municipal solid waste management—costs and revenues in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Waste Manag 34:542–552. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro SM, Rovere ELL, Mahler CF (2013) Analysis of potential for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases in municipal solid waste in Brazil, in the state and city of Rio de Janeiro. Waste Manag 33:1302–1312. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie IA, Ohndorf M (2016) Coasean bargaining in the presence of Pigouvian taxation. J Environ Econ Manage 75:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2015.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier S, Oliveira LB (2014) Economic feasibility of energy recovery from solid waste in the light of Brazil׳s waste policy: the case of Rio de Janeiro. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 35:484–498. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkow T (2004) Novel and innovative pyrolysis and gasification technologies for energy efficient and environmentally sound MSW disposal. Waste Manag 24:53–79. doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00038-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manaf LA, Samah MAA, Zukki NIM (2009) Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: practices and challenges. Waste Manag 29:2902–2906. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques F (2013) The operational proceeding evaluations of sanitary landfills of Rio de Janeiro State. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall RE, Farahbakhsh K (2013) Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Manag 33:988–1003. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massarutto A (2007) Municipal waste management as a local utility: options for competition in an environmentally-regulated industry. Util Policy 15:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2006.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mønster J, Samuelsson J, Kjeldsen P, Scheutz C (2015) Quantification of methane emissions from 15 Danish landfills using the mobile tracer dispersion method. Waste Manag 35:177–186. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015) Municipal waste

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) Guidance manual for the implementation of the OECD recommendation C(2004)100 on environmentally sound management (ESM) of waste

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa H (2000) Sustainable solid waste management in developing countries. In: Organization WH (ed) 7th ISWA international congress and exhibition. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira LB, Rosa LP (2003) Brazilian waste potential: energy, environmental, social and economic benefits. Energy Policy 31:1481–1491. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00204-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Turner RK (1989) Economics of natural resources and the environment. Johns Hopkins University

    Google Scholar 

  • Plochl C, Wetzer W, Ragossnig A (2008) Clean development mechanism: an incentive for waste management projects? Waste Manag Res 26:104–110. doi:10.1177/0734242X07087947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polzin F, Migendt M, Täube FA, von Flotow P (2015) Public policy influence on renewable energy investments—a panel data study across OECD countries. Energy Policy 80:98–111. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puig-Ventosa I (2008) Charging systems and PAYT experiences for waste management in Spain. Waste Manag 28:2767–2771. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi R (2014) A review of performance management system. Int J Acad Res 7:210–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogger C, Beaurain F, Schmidt TS (2011) Composting projects under the clean development mechanism: sustainable contribution to mitigate climate change. Waste Manag 31:138–146. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos K, Ru J, Zhou W (2012) An innovative and cost-effective solution for livestock waste management in China, Thailand and Vietnam

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui FZ, Zaidi S, Pandey S, Khan ME (2013) Review of past research and proposed action plan for landfill gas-to-energy applications in India. Waste Manag Res 31:3–22. doi:10.1177/0734242X12467066

  • Simões P, Marques RC (2012) Influence of regulation on the productivity of waste utilities. What can we learn with the Portuguese experience? Waste Manag 32:1266–1275. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh J, Laurenti R, Sinha R, Frostell B (2014) Progress and challenges to the global waste management system. Waste Manag Res 32:800–812. doi:10.1177/0734242X14537868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayyeba O, Olsson M, Brandt N (2011) The best MSW treatment option by considering greenhouse gas emissions reduction: a case study in Georgia. Waste Manag Res 29:823–833. doi:10.1177/0734242X10396119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2015) Global waste management outlook (GWMO). United Nations Environment Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2015) CDM project search. https://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/projsearch.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2015

  • USEPA (2014a) Municipal solid waste generation, recycling, and disposal in the United States Tables and Figures for 2012. 63

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2014b) Municipal solid waste generation, recycling, and disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2012. Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2015) Bioreactors, municipal solid waste. http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/municipal/landfill/bioreactors.htm. Accessed 25 Dec 2015

  • Wagner TP, Raymond T (2015) Landfill mining: case study of a successful metals recovery project. Waste Manag. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.034

  • Wang X, Nagpure AS, Decarolis JF, Barlaz MA (2013) Using observed data to improve estimated methane collection from select U.S. landfills. Environ Sci Technol 47:3251–3257. doi:10.1021/es304565m

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DC, Velis CA (2015) Waste management—still a global challenge in the 21st century: an evidence-based call for action. Waste Manag Res 33:1049–1051. doi:10.1177/0734242X15616055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2008) Solid waste management holistic decision modeling

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011) Solid waste management in Bulgaria, Croatia, Poland, and Romania : a cross-country analysis of sector challenges towards EU harmonization

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010b) Brazil low carbon case study : waste

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010a) Establishing integrated solid waste management in the large cities of Pakistan Multan : comprehensive scope evaluation report

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon J-H, Sim K (2015) Why is South Korea’s renewable energy policy failing? a qualitative evaluation. Energy Policy 86:369–379. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue D, Xu Y, Mahar RB et al (2007) Laboratory-scale experiments applied to the design of a two-stage submerged combustion evaporation system. Waste Manag 27:704–710. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2006.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre Luiz Bufoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bufoni, A.L. (2017). Modeling Trends in Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. In: Sengupta, D., Agrahari, S. (eds) Modelling Trends in Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2410-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics