Skip to main content

A ‘Good Life’ for Infants in Early Childhood Education and Care? The Place of Well-Being in ECEC Curriculum, Pedagogy and Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Under-three Year Olds in Policy and Practice

Abstract

Notions of well-being have long been heralded as vital to the good life for human beings. This chapter considers the place of well-being in ECEC with a particular focus on the complex interconnections between well-being and the pedagogical experiences of infants. An examination of the place and purpose of well-being is critiqued in relation to eudaimonic and hedonic theorisations of well-being – theorisations that have implications for both the adult and the child. We explore the philosophical and educational underpinnings of a conceptualisation of well-being and use these to critique the contemporary observed problem of a lack of care, a lack of well-being, and the development of the early childhood teaching profession. We consider the competing concerns of care and education of infants and toddlers that are evident in the policies of the ministries of Health and Education in Aotearoa New Zealand. The chapter critiques positivistic approaches that seek to reduce well-being to discrete variables or checklists of health or happiness, and offers alternative views of well-being in terms of both an experience of well-being and a professional knowledge of well-being. Drawing upon the policy context of Aotearoa New Zealand, the final section of this chapter explores how the policy context can use simplistic approaches to well-being to avoid the important interconnections that exist between well-being and pedagogy. A key policy provocation that this chapter then engages with is: Should teachers of infants have a distinct early childhood teaching qualification? The OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Starting strong II: early childhood education and care. OECD Publishing, 2006) notes that no “dominant core professional profile for work with infants and toddlers has emerged. This may be due to seeing the work as primarily a question of care, or in collective situations, as a question of maintaining health and hygiene.” We are not seeking to entrench any such dominant profession here, however we are seeking to create spaces of resistance for the dominance of some professional knowledge and educational traditions that seem to have made it possible to regard, for example, knowledge of health and hygiene as marginal (at best) matters of professional knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, P. (2015). Reforms to healthcare systems and policies: Influences from children’s rights. In A. B. Smith (Ed.), Enhancing children’s rights: Connecting research, policy and practice (pp. 17–32). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, M. (2003). Teacher status project. Stage 1 research: Identifying teacher status, its impact and recent teacher status initiatives. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll-Lind, J., & Angus, J. (2011). Through their lens: An inquiry into non-parental education and care of infant and toddlers. Wellington: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clack, B. (2012). What difference does it make? Philosophical perspectives on the nature of well-being and the role of educational practice. Research Papers in Education, 27(4), 497–512. doi:10.1080/02671522.2012.690239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on the Rights of the Child, Sept. 7, 1990, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3. Retrieved from http://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201577/v1577.pdf

  • Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalli, C., & White, E. J. (2016). Group-based early childhood education and care for under-2-year-olds: Quality debates, pedagogy and lived experience. In A. Farrell, S. L. Kagan, & E. M. Kay (Eds.), Sage handbook of early childhood research (pp. 36–50). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durie, M. (1994). Whairoa, Māori health development. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office. (2015a). School evaluation indicators: Effective practice for improvement and learner success – Trial document. Wellington: Education Review Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office. (2015b). Infants and toddlers: Competent and confident communicators and explorers. Retrieved from www.ero.govt/National-Reports/Infants_and_toddlers_competent_and_confident-communicators_and_explorers-June-2015

  • Estola, E., Farquhar, S., & Puroila, A. (2014). Well-being narratives and young children. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(8), 929–941. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.785922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, S. (2010). Ricoeur, identity, and early childhood. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, R. P., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Lapsley, A., & Roisman, G. I. (2010). The significance of insecure attachment and disorganization in the development of children’s externalizing behavior: A meta-analytic study. Child Development, 81(2), 435–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, P. D. (2011). Improving the transition: Reducing social and psychological morbidity during adolescence. Auckland: Office of the Prime Minister’s Science Advisory Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, S. (2011). The co-opting of ‘hauora’ into curricula. Curriculum Matters, 7, 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, E., & White, E. J. (2011). Educational research with our youngest: Voices of infants and toddlers. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J., & Wright, K. (2015). Inventing youth wellbeing. In K. Wright & J. McLeod (Eds.), Rethinking youth wellbeing (pp. 1–10). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1996). Te whāriki: He whāriki matauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa, Early Childhood Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2002). Kei Tua o Te Pae: Well-being. Book 12. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. (2014). Background to the youth mental health project. Retrieved from http://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/mental-health-and-addictions/youth-mental-health-project/background-youth-mental-health-project

  • Moss, P. (2006). Structures, understandings and discourses: Possibilities for re-envisioning the early childhood worker. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(1), 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novinger, S., & O’Brien, L. (2003). Beyond ‘boring, meaningless shit’ in the academy: Early childhood teacher educators under the regulatory gaze. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, J. (2013). Weaving Te Whāriki: Aotearoa New Zealand’s early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice. Wellington: NZCER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/startingstrongiiearlychildhoodeducationandcare.htm

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). How’s life? 2013: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201392-en

  • Peters, L., Gaches, S., & Swadener, B. (2015). Narratives on children’s rights and well-being. He Kupu, 4(2), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, R., & Alexandrova, A. (2014, June). Toward a theory of child well-being. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0665-z.

  • Rose, N. (1996). Inventing the self: Psychology, power, and personhood. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scopelliti, M., & Musatti, T. (2013). Parents’ view of childcare quality: Values, evaluations, and satisfaction. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(8), 1025–1038. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9664-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, M., Guilfoyle, A., & Parry, T. (2005). What children’s cortisol levels tell us about quality in childcare centres. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 30(2), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeyers, P. (2010a). State intervention and the technologisation and regulation of parenting. Educational Theory, 60(3), 265–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeyers, P. (2010b). Child-rearing in the “risk” society: On the discourse of rights and the “best interests of a child”. Educational Theory, 60(3), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, C., Dunlop, A., & Trevarthen, C. (2003). Meeting the needs of children from birth to three: Research evidence and implications for out-of-home provision. Insight 6. Scottish Executive Education Department. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED477474.pdf

  • Sumsion, J., & Harrison, L. (2014). Exploring lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care. In L. Harrsion & J. Sumsion (Eds.), Lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care exploring diverse perspectives on theory, research and practice (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryphonopoulos, P., Letourneau, N., & Ditommaso, E. (2014). Attachment and caregiver-infant interaction: A review of observational-assessment tools. Infant Mental Health Journal, 35(6), 642–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, E. J. (2013). Cry, baby. Cry: A dialogic response to emotion. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(1), 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Gibbons .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibbons, A., Stratford, R., White, E.J. (2017). A ‘Good Life’ for Infants in Early Childhood Education and Care? The Place of Well-Being in ECEC Curriculum, Pedagogy and Policy. In: White, E.J., Dalli, C. (eds) Under-three Year Olds in Policy and Practice. Policy and Pedagogy with Under-three Year Olds: Cross-disciplinary Insights and Innovations. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2275-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2275-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2274-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2275-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics