Abstract
This chapter describes the main functions of Building Envelopes, particularly in the context of daylighting (including the role of the outside view, smart windows, etc.). The functions of Building Envelope are compared with organic skin. Finally, an example of a relatively successful integration of adaptivity and aesthetics in the building of the Arab World Institute is presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed A, Korres NE, Ploennigs J, Elhadi H, Menzel K (2011) Mining building performance data for energy-efficient operation. Adv Eng Inform 25(2):341–354
Aschehoug O (2000) Daylight in buildings: a source book on daylighting systems and components. International Energy Agency
Aydinli S, Seidl M (1986) Determination of the economic benefits of daylight in interiors concerned with the fulfillment of visual tasks. In: Adepski M, McCluney R (eds) Proceedings I: 1986 international daylighting conference. Long Beach California, USA, pp 145–151
Baetens R, Jelle BP, Gustavsen A (2010) Properties, requirements and possibilities of smart windows for dynamic daylight and solar energy control in buildings: A state-of-the-art review. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 94(2):87–105
Bodart M, De Herde A (2002) Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting. Energy Build 34(5):421–429
Boyce P (1998) Why daylight? In: Proceedings of daylight ’98, international conference on daylighting technologies for energy efficiency in buildings, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, pp 359–365
Boyce P, Hunter C, Howlett O (2003) The benefits of daylight through windows: Report. Technical report, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York
Caffrey RJ (1988) The intelligent building: an ASHRAE opportunity. ASHRAE
Connor S (2004) The book of skin. Cornell University Press, New York
Cowling I, Coyne S, Bradley G (1990) Light in brisbane office buildings: a survey
Cuttle C (2003) Lighting by design. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Fontoynont M (2002) Perceived performance of daylighting systems: lighting efficacy and agreeableness. Sol Energy 73(2):83–94
Frontczak M, Wargocki P (2011) Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Build Environ 46(4):922–937
Galasiu AD, Veitch JA (2006) Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review. Energy Build 38(7):728–742
Glass DC, Singer JE (1972) Urban stress
Gossauer E, Wagner A (2005) User satisfaction at workspaces: a study in 12 office buildings in Germany. CISBAT, Lausanne, Switzerland
Kari J (2005) Theory of cellular automata: a survey. Theoret Comput Sci 304(1–3):3–33
Kim JT, Kim G (2010) Overview and new developments in optical daylighting systems for building a healthy indoor environment. Build Environ 45(2):256–269
Lampert CM (1989) Failure and degradation modes in selected solar materials: a review. International Energy Agency
Li DH, Wong SL (2007) Daylighting and energy implications due to shading effects from nearby buildings. Appl Energy 84(12):1199–1209
Madison KC (2003) Barrier function of the skin: “la raison d’etre” of the epidermis. J Investig Dermatol 121(2):231–241
Nasar JL, Terzano K (2010) The desirability of views of city skylines after dark. J Environ Psychol 30(2):215–225
Osterhaus W (2001) Discomfort glare from daylight in computer offices: how much do we really know. Proceedings of LUX Europa, pp 448–456
Pfafferott JÜ, Herkel S, Kalz DE, Zeuschner A (2007) Comparison of low-energy office buildings in summer using different thermal comfort criteria. Energy Build 39(7):750–757
Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen JM (2008) The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol 17(12):1063–1072
Sottile G (2005) 2004 survey of united states architects on the subject of switchable glazings. Mater Sci Eng: B 119(3):240–245
Sutter Y, Dumortier D, Fontoynont M (2006) The use of shading systems in vdu task offices: a pilot study. Energy Build 38(7):780–789
Torcellini P, Pless S (2004) Trombe walls in low-energy buildings: practical experiences. Conference Report NREL/CP-550-36277. Presented at the World Renewable Energy Congress VIII, Denver, CO, Citeseer. Preprint www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/36277.pdf
Tregenza P (1995) Mean daylight illuminance in rooms facing sunlit streets. Build Environ 30(1):83–89
Ulrich R (1984) View through a window may influence recovery. Science 224(4647):224–225
Ulrich RS (1979) Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Science 4(1):17–23
Ulrich RS (1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. Behavior and the natural environment. Springer, New York, pp 85–125
Veitch JA (2001) Psychological processes influencing lighting quality. Science 30(1):124–140
Wang W, Rivard H, Zmeureanu R (2006) Floor shape optimization for green building design. Science 20(4):363–378
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zawidzki, M. (2017). The Skin of a Building. In: Discrete Optimization in Architecture. SpringerBriefs in Architectural Design and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1391-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1391-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1390-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1391-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)