Abstract
Strategic bridging of various institutions into a functional network and enhancing communication between the nodes is a low-cost and effective approach for gathering grassroots level information and dissemination of scientific knowledge to various actors of a multi-stakeholder society. Such a cross-talking network of institutions, for example, schools, colleges, nongovernmental organisations, youth clubs and interested individuals, is the heart of participatory research programmes, such as citizen science projects. Although citizen science projects have gained popularity since mid-1990s, very few studies have critically analysed the dynamics and efficacy of interinstitutional networks in India. Here we share our experiences of connecting two major compartments of the educational system, school and college, in the Valanchery region of Malappuram District, Kerala, India, via a ‘student network’ for a citizen science programme to monitor the local mammalian diversity.
When spider webs unite, they can tie up a lion
—Ethiopian proverb
Views expressed in the chapter are the authors’ own and not necessarily shared by the editors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aslaksen, J., & Myhr, A. I. (2007). “The worth of a wildflower”: Precautionary perspectives on the environmental risk or GMOs. Ecological Economics, 60, 489–497.
Balakrishnan, P. (2010). An education programme and establishment of a citizen scientist network to reduce killing of non-venomous snakes in Malappuram district, Kerala, India. Conservation Evidence, 7, 9–15.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA: Englewood Cliffs.
Bonney R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE)
Braschler, B. (2009). Successfully implementing a citizen scientist approach to insect monitoring in a resource-poor country. BioScience, 59, 103–104.
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1099–1121.
Brown, L. D. (1991). Bridging organizations and sustainable development. Human Relations, 44, 807-831.
Centre for Development Studies. (2006). Human development report-2005. Thiruvananthapuram: State Planning Board, Government of Kerala.
Code, L. (2006). Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crona, B. I., & Parker, J. N. (2012). Learning in support of governance: theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17, 32.
Danielsen, F., Skutsch, M., Burgess, N. D., Jensen, P. M., Andrianandrasana, H., Karky, B., et al. (2011). At the heart of REDD+: A role for local people in monitoring forests? Conservation Letters, 4, 158–167.
Delaney, D. G., Sperling, C. D., Adams, C. S., & Leung, B. (2008). Marine invasive species: Validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions, 10, 117–128.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young peoples’s images of science. Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
Ely, E. (2008) Volunteer monitoring and the democratization of science. The Volunteer Monitor, 19, 1–5.
Engel, S. R., & Voshell, J. R. (2002). Volunteer biological monitoring: Can it accurately assess the ecological condition of streams? American Entomologist, 48, 164–177.
Franke, R. W., & Chasin, B. H. (1990). Development without growth: The Kerala experience. Technology Review, 93, 42–51.
Galloway, A. W. E., Tudor, M. T. & Vander Haegen W. M. (2006). The reliability of citizen science: A case study of Oregon White Oak stand surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 1425–1429.
Gommerman, L., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Lessons learned from evaluations of citizen science programs, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date May 2012. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
Haywood, B. K., & Besley, J. C. (2014). Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: Towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science. Public Understanding Science, 23, 92–106.
Hogan, K. (2002). Pitfalls of community-based learning: How power dynamics limit adolescents’ trajectories of growth and participation. Teachers College Record, 104, 586–624.
Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Krasny, M. E., Tidball, K. G., & Sriskandarajah, N. (2009). Education and resilience: Social and situated learning among university and secondary students. Ecology and Society, 14, 38.
Lamberson, P. J. (2009). Social Learning in Social Networks. MIT Sloan School Working Paper 4763-09, MIT Sloan School of Management.
Lepage, D., & Francis, C. M. (2002). Do feeder counts reliably indicate bird population changes? 21 years of winter bird counts in Ontario, Canada. The Condor, 104, 255–270.
Moore, K. (2011). Survey: How much would you pay to save the bay? Asbury Park Press. Retrieved from http://bbp.ocean.edu/pages/109.asp?item=584
Mueller, M. P. & Tippins, D. J. (2012). Citizen science, ecojustice, and science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 865–882). New York: Springer.
Mueller, M. P., Tippins, D., & Bryan, L. A. (2012). The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20. Article 2.
Nerbonne, J. F., & Nelson, K. C. (2008). Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring: Tensions among group goals, data quality, and outcomes. Environmental Management, 42, 470–479.
Olsson, P., Folke, C., Galaz, V., Hahn, T. & Schultz. L. (2007). Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden. Ecology and Society, 12, 28.
Parayil, G. (1989). “Science for social revolution”: Science and culture in Kerala. Impact of Science on Society, 155, 233–240.
Parayil, G. (1996). The ‘Kerala Model’ of development: Development and sustainability in the third world. Third World Quarterly, 5, 941–957.
Phillips, A. L. (2008). Of sunflowers and citizens. American Scientist, 96, 375.
Quader, S., & Raza, R. H. (2008). Migrant watch: A citizen science programme for the study of bird migration. Indian Birds, 3, 202–209.
Ramachandran, V. K. (1995). A note on Kerala’s development achievements. Monthly Review, 47, 19–24.
Ramachandran, V. K. (1997). On Kerala’s development achievements. In J. Dreze & A. Sen (Eds.), Indian development: Selected regional perspectives (pp. 205–356). Delhi: OUP.
Rist, S., Chidambaranathanb, M., Escobarc, C., Wiesmannd, U., & Zimmermanne, A. (2007). Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 23–37.
Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., Bascom, D., & Cabral, A. (2000). Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education, 84, 265–275.
Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2005). Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned. Science Education, 89, 879–900.
Weinstein, M. (2012). Schools/citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20, 1–3.
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to the principal, staff and students of MES Keveeyam College, Valanchery for their support during this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Binoy, V.V., Radhakrishna, S., Kurup, A. (2017). Bridging Educational Institutions for a Citizen Science Project: A Case Study from Malappuram District, Kerala, India. In: Bagla, P., Binoy, V. (eds) Bridging the Communication Gap in Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1025-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1025-5_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1024-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1025-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)