Skip to main content

Navigating Talent Development by Fulfilling Gaps Between Gifted Potential and Performance

  • Chapter
Giftedness and Talent in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Advances in Creativity and Giftedness ((ACAG,volume 10))

  • 1292 Accesses

Abstract

Fulfilling gaps between gifted potential and actual performance is a major concern for many parents and educators as well as gifted students. The major challenges posed by the 21st-century trends and issues are magnifying the importance of addressing these gaps. Underachievement is typically defined as the discrepancy between individuals’ potential and actual performance/achievement (Baum, Renzulli, & Hébert, 1995; Colangelo, Kerr, Christensen, & Maxey, 1993; Lupart & Pyryt, 1996; Rimm, 1997, 2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ambrose, D. (2016). Twenty-first century contextual influences on the life trajectories of the gifted, and talented. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Giftedness and talent in the 21st century: Adapting to the turbulence of globalization (chapter 2, this volume). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Hébert, T. P. (1995). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear, P., Torgerson, C., & Dubois-Gerchak, K. (2010). A positive procedure to increase compliance in the general education classroom for a student with serious emotional disorders. In G. S. Goodman (Ed.), Educational psychology reader: The art and science of how people learn (pp. 75–87). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, F. E., Woods, D. W., Carlyon, W. D., & Friman, P. C. (2000). Using positive peer reporting to improve the social interactions and acceptance of socially isolated adolescents in residential care: A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 239–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Morris, D. (2008). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs among high school students in different tracking levels. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., & Hannafin, M. J. (1995). Situated cognation and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implication for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of gifted children at school and at home (8th ed.). Singapore: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Christensen, P., & Maxey, J. (1993). A comparison of gifted underachievers and gifted high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M. (2006). Distinctiveness and memory: Comments and a point of view. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 425–442). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramond, B. (1994). Attention deficit hyperactivity and creativity: What is the connection? Journal of Creative Behavior, 28, 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development: Multilevelness and positive disintegration. Oceanside, NY: Dabor Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, D. (1978). The development of a learning strategies curriculum. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Learning strategies (pp. 1–29). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38, 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do, J., & Yang, Y. (2011). The effect of learning planners developed with behavioral regulatory strategies on college students’ self-regulated learning skills improvement. Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 7(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2013). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, M., & Kettle, K. (1998). Distinguishing myths from realities: NRC/GT Research. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter, 9–12. Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grauvogel-MacAleese, A. N., & Wallace, M. D. (2010). Use of peer mediated intervention in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 547–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note taking: A critical review. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15, 207–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2011). Creative approaches to problem solving (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. S., Levin, M. E., Levin, J. R., & Beitzel, B. D. (2000). Can vocabulary-learning strategies and pair-learning formats be profitably combined? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KADO. (2003). Internet, my healthy friend. Seoul: Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.

    Google Scholar 

  • KADO. (2006). A group counseling program: Internet use modifications for middle school students. Seoul: Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.

    Google Scholar 

  • KADO. (2009). A life-long counseling program for the Internet addiction. Seoul: Korea Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. (1989). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Do, J. (2012). Case study for university freshmen adaptation. Journal of Education and Culture, 18, 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. (2002). The effect on children’s reading vocabulary ability and interests in English through the use of computer games (Unpublished master’s thesis). Busan National University of Education, Busan, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, A., Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. (2000). The role of observation and emulation in the development of athletic self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 811–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2001). A study on developing the Internet game addiction diagnostic scale and the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for the Internet game addiction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y. (2015). Civic education as a means of talent dissemination for gifted students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Donahue, R., & Weimholt, K. (2007). The effects of a service-learning program on the development of civic attitudes and behaviors among academically talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 165–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Donahue, R., & Weimbolt, K. (2008). The civic leadership institute: A service-learning program for academically gifted youth. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 272–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. (1999). An edutainmental (educational+entertaining) education environment research on the cyber space (Unpublished master’s thesis). Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., & Reinders, H. (2007). Using student-centered methods with teacher-centered students. Toronto, ON: Pippin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupart, J. L., & Pyryt, M. C. (1996). “Hidden gifted” students: Underachiever prevalence and profile. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, N., & Goldstein, S. (2001). Learning disabilities and challenging behaviors: A guide to intervention and classroom management. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behaviour modification: An integrative approach. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. (2000). Treating patients with PTSD: A constructive narrative perspective. Clinical Quarterly, 9, 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, L. K. (2002). Team-based learning in large classes. In L. K. Michaelsen, A. B. Knight, & L. D. Fink (Eds.), Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups (pp. 157–172). Westport, CT: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalko, M. (2001). Cracking creativity: The secrets of creative genius. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minskoff, E., & Allsopp, D. (2003). Academic success strategies for adolescents with learning disabilities & ADHD. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., Ludwin, W. G., & Iadicola, P. (1999). A darker shade of gray: A year‐end analysis of discipline and suspension data. Equity & Excellence, 32(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, M. (2011). Reinventing discovery: The new era of networked science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Girgus, J. S., & Seligman, M. E. (1986). Learned helplessness in children: A longitudinal study of depression, achievement, and explanatory style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Educational psychology: Developing learners (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York, NY: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, E., Bru, E., & Murberg, T. A. (2006). Passive students in junior high school: The associations with shyness, perceived competence and social support. Social Psychology of Education, 9(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner, L. J., Barkley, R. A., & DuPaul, G. J. (2006). Treatment of ADHD in school settings. In R. A. Barkley (Ed.), Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (pp. 547–589). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piechowski, M. M., & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1998). Understanding those who create (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery: Understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M., & Housand, A. M. (2008). Characteristics of gifted and talented learners: Similarities and differences across domains. In F. A. Karnes & K. R. Stephens (Eds.), Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented (pp. 62–81). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246–279). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. B. (1997). An underachievement epidemic. Educational Leadership, 54(7), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. B. (2003). Underachievement: A national epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 424–443). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. B. (2008). Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it: A six step program for parents and teachers. Tucson, AZ: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. (2015). Arts and crafts as adjuncts to STEM education to foster creativity in gifted and talented students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The 13 thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. New York, NY: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, R. (2003). Intuitive tools for innovative thinking. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 377–387). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rortvedt, A. K., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). Analysis of a high-probability instructional sequence and time-out in the treatment of child noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 327–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity theories and themes: Research, development and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S., Ormond, T., Imwold, C., & Rotunda, R. J. (2002). The effects of a public address system on the off-task behavior of elementary physical education students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 305–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2008). Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 463–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence beliefs in academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85–104). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the brain learns. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starko, A. J. (2005). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Wisdom as a form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2003a). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2003b). Giftedness according to the theory of successful intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 88–99). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327–342). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2008). Human cognitive architecture. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 369–381). New York, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P., & Torrance, J. P. (1978). The 1977–1978 Future Problem Solving Program: Interscholastic competition and curriculum project. Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 87–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Stead-Dorval, K. B. (2006). Creative problem solving: An introduction (4th ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J., Schoonover, P. F., & Selby, E. C. (2013). Educating for creativity and innovation. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderstoep, S. W., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Learning to learn: The skill and will of college success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, J., Scheuermann, B., McCall, C., & Coleman, M. (1993). Research on self-monitoring as a behavior management technique in special education classrooms: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 14(2), 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, A. G., & Bailey, J. S. (1990). Reducing disruptive behaviors of elementary physical education students with sit and watch. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., Willoughby, T., McDermott, C., Motz, M., Kaspar, V., & Ducharme, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in study behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yell, M. L., Robinson, T. R., & Drasgow, E. (2001). Cognitive behavior modification. In T. J. Zirpoli & K. J. Melloy (Eds.), Behavior management: Applications for teachers (pp. 200–246). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2002). Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 660–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 73–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, SY. (2016). Navigating Talent Development by Fulfilling Gaps Between Gifted Potential and Performance. In: Ambrose, D., Sternberg, R.J. (eds) Giftedness and Talent in the 21st Century. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness, vol 10. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-503-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-503-6_14

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-503-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics