Skip to main content

Managing the Barriers in Diversity Education that We Create

An Examination of the Production of University Courses about Diversity

  • Chapter
Disability Studies

Part of the book series: Innovations and Controversies ((ICIE))

Abstract

It is important to provide beginning teachers with the skills they need to support students with diverse needs in the classroom. These skills are especially needed to support students with autism. Without the tools needed, beginning teachers go into schools where the teachers may or may not have the requisite skills needed either.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Australian Human Rights Commission. (2014). Human rights framework. Retrieved from https://www.humanrights.gov.au

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2010). Exploring disability (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M. (2004). The diversity scorecard: A learning approach to institutional change. Change, 36(1), 44–52. doi:10.1080/00091380409605083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173. doi:10.1080/01425699995380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. (2010). Exploring the role changing text types play in the fourth grade slump in reading comprehension through critical discourse analysis (Unpublished honour’s thesis). Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Applied Special Technology. (2014). Universal design for learning. Retrieved from https://www.cast.org

  • Clapton, J. (2009). A transformatory ethic of inclusion: Rupturing concepts of disability and inclusion. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, K. (2014). A troubled identity. Paper presented at the Disability Studies in Education Conference. Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (1997). The subject of poststructuralism: A reply to Alison Jones. Gender and Education, 9(3), 271–283. doi:10.1080/09540259721259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. D. (2005). Disability: Definitions, value and identity. Oxford, UK: Radcliffe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, P. (2014). Inclusion in action. Melbourne, Australia: Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P., Maton, K., & Martin, J. R. (2008). Talk, text, and knowledge in cumulative, integrated learning: A response to ‘intellectual challenge.’ Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 188–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith University. (2013). Griffith university strategic plan 2013–2017. Retrieved from http://www.griffith.edu.au/about-griffith/plans-publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Honan, E., Knobel, M., Baker, C., & Davies, B. (2000). Producing possible Hannahs: Theory and the subject of research. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 9–32. doi:10.1177/107780040000600102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147. doi:10/1080/17508481003731026

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Green, J., & Kelly G. J. (Eds.). (2010). What counts as evidence in educational settings? Rethinking equity, diversity, and reform in the 21st century. Review of Research in Education, 34, 226–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Program for international student assessment. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/31/16/33684855.pdf

  • Piotrowicz, R., & Kaye, S. (2000). Human rights in international and Australian law. Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, J. N. (2010). Autism as culture. The disability studies reader (3rd ed., pp. 535–562). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, A. W. (2010). The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends. In A. Luke, J. Green, & G. J. Kelly (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garrick, B., Winter, S., Sani, M., Buxton, L. (2015). Managing the Barriers in Diversity Education that We Create. In: Corcoran, T., White, J., Whitburn, B. (eds) Disability Studies. Innovations and Controversies. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-199-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics