Abstract
The three preceding cases of civil disobedience in a global perspective are expressions of global solidarity. Besides the addition of a human right to be a political participant, wherever you are, to the minimalist list of human rights in Law of Peoples, such disobedience does not otherwise point to any particular changes or reforms of law and policy. Its function is highlighting the piecewise just and unfair terms of global cooperation and motivating reconsideration by decent peoples that could lead to different kinds of policy outcomes based on the resulting processes of global public communication and deliberation. To this extent, the global civil disobedience practice of diverse cosmopolitan citizens express global solidarity with the undocumented and the global poor. Likewise, executives and disclosers express solidarity with decent peoples whom they see as facing different kinds of existential threats qua decent peoples. They do so in that disobedient cosmopolitan citizens adopt a perspective of concern for the most vulnerable in the system of merely piecewise just or unfair global cooperation. Indeed, this perspective of concern expresses a global solidarity relation. I then build on the discussion of diverse global civil disobedience practices as expressing global solidarity relations by offering an analytical redefinition of civil disobedience in a global perspective. This redefinition synthesizes the various claims of the preceding chapters regarding my extension of Rawls’ state-centered definition and justification of civil disobedience in Theory to the Law of Peoples. It also identifies global solidarity as the principal aim of such an extension of justifiable civil disobedience to the global arena.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, Michael P., and Erica Von Essen. 2016. Neo-Republicanism as a Route to Animal Non-Domination. Politics and Animals 2(1): 15–24.
Arnsperger, Christian, and Yanis Varoufakis. 2003. Towards a Theory of Solidarity. Erkenntnis 59(2): 157–188.
Beitz, Charles. 2011. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brownlee, Kimberlee. 2012. Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, Jean. 2007. Moral Solidarity and Empathetic Understanding: The Moral Value and Scope of the Relationship. Journal of Social Philosophy 38(1): 22–37.
Hauseby, Robert. 2013. Rawls and Climate Justice: An Amendment to the Law of Peoples. Environmental Ethics 35(2): 227–243.
Kolers, Avery. 2012. Dynamics of Solidarity. Journal of Political Philosophy 20(4): 137–156.
Krishnamurthy, Meena. 2013. Political Solidarity, Justice and Public Health. Public Health Ethics 6(2): 129–141.
Lenard, Patti, Christine Straehle, and Lea Ypi. 2010. Global Solidarity. Contemporary Political Theory 9(1): 99.
Miller, David. 2012. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(2): 113–147.
Rawls, John. 2001. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rehg, Willian. 1997. Insight and Solidarity: The Discourse Ethics of JĂĽrgen Habermas, Philosophy, Social Theory, and the Rule of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rippe, Klause. 1998. Diminishing Solidarity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1(3): 355–373.
Sandel, Michael. 1997. Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosphy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Straehle, Christine. 2010. National and Cosmopolitan Solidarity. Contemporary Political Theory 9(1): 110–120.
Thomas, Laurence. 1993. Moral Flourishing in an Unjust World. Journal of Moral Education 22(2): 83–96.
von Essen, Erica. 2017. Environmental Disobedience and the Dialogic Dimension of Dissent. Democratization 24(2): 305–324.
Von Essen, Erica and Michael P. Allen. 2017. Solidarity Between Human and Non-Human Animals: Representing Animal Voices in Policy Deliberations. doi 10.1080/17524032.1269820.
Welchman, Jennifer. 2001. Is Ecosabotage Civil Disobedience? Philosophy and Geography 4(1): 97–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, M. (2017). Disobedience as an Expression of Global Solidarity and Redefining Disobedience in a Global Perspective. In: Civil Disobedience in Global Perspective. Studies in Global Justice, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1164-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1164-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1162-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1164-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)