Skip to main content

Logic in the Arabic and Islamic World

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

The Arabic logical tradition emerged from the Graeco-Arabic translation movement from the eighth to the tenth centuries. In its initial stages, it was closely linked to the activity of translating and commenting upon Aristotle’s Organon. By the early tenth century, a circle of Aristotelian scholars had emerged in Baghdad who saw themselves as a continuation of the Alexandrian tradition. Its most prominent representative was undoubtedly Al-Fārābī (d. 950), who wrote esteemed commentaries on Aristotle’s logical works, as well as a number of treatises introducing logic (manṭiq) to an environment that often viewed the Greek sciences with suspicion. The influence of the Baghdad circle eventually reached Islamic Spain, where Aristotelian philosophy and logic flourished in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, culminating in the monumental commentaries on Aristotle by Averroes (d. 1198). In other parts of the Islamic world, however, the influence emanating from Avicenna (d. 1037) eventually superseded that of Aristotle. Avicenna was less concerned with getting the interpretation of Aristotle right and more willing to make radical departures from the Aristotelian tradition. By the thirteenth century, his works had replaced those of Aristotle as the point of reference for most logicians writing in Arabic. The prominent theologian Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 1210) approached the Avicennian tradition with the same irreverence with which Avicenna had himself approached the Aristotelian tradition. He also decisively reoriented the scope of logic toward a focused study of terms, propositions, and syllogisms, rather than the entirety of topics covered in the Organon. A number of thirteenth-century logicians working in the wake of Avicenna and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī produced sophisticated and original summas of formal logic. They also produced a number of condensed handbooks that formed the basis of logical studies at colleges throughout the Islamic world until modern times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Sources

    Editions

    • Abharī Athīr al-Dīn. (1877). Īsāġūjī. Printed with the commentary of Fenārī and the glosses of Ḳūl Aḥmed Matbaʿat Akhtar, Istanbul.

      Google Scholar 

    • al-Fārābī. (1985–1987). al-Manṭiq ʿinda l-Fārābī (3 vols.; ed.: al-ʿAjam, R.). Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq.

      Google Scholar 

    • al-Fārābī. (1989). al-Manṭiqiyyāt li-l-Fārābī (3 vols.; ed.: Danishpazhuh, M. T.). Qum: Matbaʿat Ayatollah al-Mar'ashi al-Najafi.

      Google Scholar 

    • al-Rāzī Fakhr al-Dīn. (2003). Manṭiq al-Mulakhkhaṣ (eds.: Karamaleki, A. F., & Asgharinezhad, A.). Tehran: ISU Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • al-Rāzī Fakhr al-Dīn. (2005). Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt (Vol. 1 (logic); ed.: Najafzada, A.). Tehran: Anjuman-i Asar ve Mafakhir-i Farhangi.

      Google Scholar 

    • Bihārī Muḥibbullāh. (1910–1911). Sullam al-ʿulūm. Lithographed with the commentaries of Gōpamāwī and Sandīlī. Matbaʿat al-Mujtabaʿi, Delhi.

      Google Scholar 

    • Ferrari, C. (2006). Die Kategorienkommentar von Abū l-Farağ ʿ Abdallāh ibn aṭ-Ṭayyib: Text und Untersuchungen. Leiden: Brill.

      Google Scholar 

    • Ibn Rushd. (1978). Talkhīṣ Kitāb al-ʿIbāra (eds.: Butterworth, C., & Harīdī, A. A.). Cairo: al-Hayʿa al-Misriyya al-ʿamma li-l-kitab.

      Google Scholar 

    • Ibn Rushd. (1979). Talkhīṣ Kitāb al-Jadal (eds.: Butterworth, C., & Harīdī, A. A.). Cairo: al-Hayʿa al-Misriyya al-ʿamma li-l-kitab.

      Google Scholar 

    • Ibn Rushd (1983) Talkīṣ Kitāb al-Qiyās (eds.: Butterworth, C., & Harīdī, A. A.). Cairo: al-Hayʿa al-Misriyya al-ʿamma li-l-kitab.

      Google Scholar 

    • Ibn Sīnā. (1952ff.) al-Shifā’ (Multi-volume eds.: el-Khodeiri, M., Anawati, G., Madkour, I., et al.). Cairo: Ministry of Culture.

      Google Scholar 

    • Ibn Sīnā. (1957–1958). al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt. Printed in three volumes (the first on logic) with the commentary of Ṭūṣī and the glosses of Taḥtānī. Qum: Matbaʿat al-Haydari.

      Google Scholar 

    • Kātibī Najm al-Dīn. (1905). al-Risāla al-Shamsiyya. Printed in two volumes with the commentary of Taḥtānī and the glosses of Jurjānī, Siyālkūtī, and ʿAdawī. Cairo: al-Matbaʿa al-Amiriyya.

      Google Scholar 

    • Khūnajī Afḍal al-Dīn (2010) Kashf al-asrār ʿan ġawāmiḍ al-afkār (ed.: El-Rouayheb, K.). Berlin/Tehran: Institute for Islamic Studies & Iranian Institute of Philosophy.

      Google Scholar 

    • Qaramaleki, A. (Ed.). (2007). Twelve treatises on liar paradox in Shiraz school. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy.

      Google Scholar 

    • Sanūsī Muḥammad b. Yūsuf. (1875). Sharḥ al-Mukhtaṣar fī l-manṭiq. Cairo.

      Google Scholar 

    • Taftāzānī Saʿd al-Dīn. (1988). Tahdhīb al-manṭiq. Printed with the commentary of Mullā ʿAbdullāh al-Yazdī. Beirut: Muʿassasat Ahl al-Bayt.

      Google Scholar 

    • Urmawī Sirāj al-Dīn. (1861). Maṭāliʿ al-anwār. Printed with the commentary of Taḥtānī and the glosses of Jurjānī. Istanbul: Matbaʿa-i Amire.

      Google Scholar 

    Translations

    • Ahmed, A. (2010). Avicenna: Deliverance: Logic. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Butterworth, C. (1998). Averroes’ middle commentary on Aristotle’s categories and de interpretatione. South Bend: St. Augustine Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Calverley, E.E. (1933). Abhari’s Īsāġūjī fī’l-manṭiq. In The Macdonald presentation volume. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Dunlop, D. M. (1958). Al-Farabi’s introductory Risala on logic. Islamic Quarterly, 3, 224–235.

      Google Scholar 

    • Gyekye, K. (1979). Arabic logic: Ibn al-Tayyib’s commentary on Porphyry’s Eisagoge. Albany: SUNY Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Hallaq, W. (1993). Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek logicians. Oxford: Clarendon.

      Book  Google Scholar 

    • Inati, S. (1981). Avicenna: Remarks and admonitions: Part one: Logic. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

      Google Scholar 

    • Lameer, J. (2006). Conception and belief in Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy.

      Google Scholar 

    • Rescher, N. (1963a). Al-Fārābī’s short commentary on Aristotle’s prior analytics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

      Google Scholar 

    • Rosenthal, F. (1958). The Muqaddima of Ibn Khaldūn. New York: Pantheon Books.

      Google Scholar 

    • Shehaby, N. (1973). The propositional logic of Avicenna. Dordrecht: Reidel.

      Book  Google Scholar 

    • Zabeeh, F. (1971). Avicenna: Treatise on logic. The Hague: Nijhoff.

      Google Scholar 

    • Zimmermann, F. (1981). Al-Fārābī: Commentary and short treatise on Aristotle’s de interpretatione. London: British Academy & Oxford University Press.

      Google Scholar 

    Secondary Sources

      Studies

      • Black, D. (1998). Logic in Islamic philosophy. In Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 5, pp. 706–713). London: Routledge.

        Google Scholar 

      • Elamrani-Jamal, A. (1995). Ibn Rushd et les Premiers Analytiques d’Aristote: aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 5, 51–74.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • El-Rouayheb, K. (2004). Sunni Islamic scholars on the status of logic, 1500–1800. Islam Law Society, 11, 213–232.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • El-Rouayheb, K. (2009). Impossible antecedents and their consequences: Some thirteenth-century Arabic discussions. History and Philosophy of Logic, 30, 209–225.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • El-Rouayheb, K. (2010). Relational syllogisms & the history of Arabic logic, 900–1900. Leiden: Brill.

        Book  Google Scholar 

      • El-Rouayheb, K. (2016). Does a proposition have three parts or four: A debate in later Arabic logic. Oriens, 44, 301–331.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • Gutas, D. (1988). Avicenna and the Aristotelian tradition. Leiden: Brill.

        Google Scholar 

      • Gutas, D. (1993). Aspects of literary form and genre in Arabic logical works. In C. Burnett (Ed.), Glosses and commentaries on Aristotelian logical texts. London: Warburg Institute.

        Google Scholar 

      • Gutas, D. (1998). Greek thought, Arabic culture. London: Routledge.

        Book  Google Scholar 

      • Gutas, D. (1999). The ‘Alexandria to Baghdad’ complex of narratives. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 10, 155–193.

        Google Scholar 

      • Hallaq, W. (1990). Logic, formal arguments and formalization of arguments in Sunni jurisprudence. Arabica, 87, 315–358.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • Hasnawi, A. (1985). Fārābī et la practique de l’exégèse philosophique. Revue de Synthèse, 117, 27–59.

        Google Scholar 

      • Hugonnard-Roche, H. (2004). La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque. Paris: Vrin.

        Google Scholar 

      • Inati, S. (1996). Logic. In S. H. Nasr & O. Leaman (Eds.), History of Islamic philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 802–823). London: Routledge.

        Google Scholar 

      • Lameer, J. (1994). Al-Farabi and Aristotelian syllogistic: Greek theory and Islamic practice. Leiden: Brill.

        Google Scholar 

      • Lameer, J. (2014). Ghayr al-maʿlūm yamtaniʿ al-ḥukm ʿalayhi: An exploratory anthology of a false paradox in medieval Islamic philosophy. Oriens, 42, 397–453.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • Madkour, I. (1969). L’Organon d’Aristote dans le monde arabe. Paris: Vrin.

        Google Scholar 

      • Marmura, M. (1975). Ghazali’s attitude to the secular sciences and logic. In G. Hourani (Ed.), Essays in Islamic philosophy and science. Albany: SUNY Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Rescher, N. (1963b). Studies in the history of Arabic logic. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Rescher, N. (1964). The development of Arabic logic. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Sabra, A. I. (1965). A twelfth-century defence of the fourth-figure of the syllogism. Journal Warbg Courtauld Institute, 28, 14–28.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • Sabra, A. I. (1980). Avicenna on the subject-matter of logic. Journal of Philosophy, 77, 746–764.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • Sabra, A. I. (1996). Situating Arabic science: Locality versus essence. Isis, 87, 654–670.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • Street, T. (1995). Ṭūṣī on Avicenna’s logical connectives. History Philosophy Logic, 16, 257–268.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • Street, T. (2002). An outline of Avicenna’s syllogistic. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 84, 129–160.

        Article  Google Scholar 

      • Street, T. (2003). Logic. In P. Adamson & R. Taylor (Eds.), Cambridge companion to Arabic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Street, T. (2004). Arabic logic. In D. M. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic, vol I: Greek, Indian and Arabic logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

        Google Scholar 

      • Street, T. (2005). Faḫraddin ar-Razi’s critique of Avicennan logic. In U. Rudolph & D. Perler (Eds.), Logik und Theologie. Das Organon im arabischen und im lateinischen Mittelalter. Leiden: Brill.

        Google Scholar 

      • Street, T. (2008). Arabic and Islamic philosophy of language and logic. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/arabic-islamic-language/

      • Strobino, R., & Thom, P. (2016). The logic of modality. In C. Dutilh-Novaes & S. Read (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to medieval logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Thom, P. (2008). Logic and metaphysics in Avicenna’s modal syllogistic. In S. Rahman, T. Street, & H. Tahiri (Eds.), The unity of science in the Arabic tradition: Metaphysics, logic and epistemology and their interactions. Dordrecht: Springer.

        Google Scholar 

      • Watt, J. (2009). Al-Farabi and the history of the Syruac Organon. In G. Kiraz (Ed.), Malphono w-Rabo d-Malphone: Studies in honor of Sebastian P. Brock (pp. 751–778). Piscataway: Gorgias Press.

        Google Scholar 

      • Wisnovsky, R. (2004). The nature and scope of Arabic philosophical commentary in post-classical (ca.1100–1900) Islamic intellectual history: Some preliminary observations. In P. Adamson, H. Balthussen, & M. W. F. Stone (Eds.), Philosophy, science and exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin commentaries (Vol. 2, pp. 149–191). London: Institute of Advanced Studies.

        Google Scholar 

      Download references

      Author information

      Authors and Affiliations

      Authors

      Corresponding author

      Correspondence to Khaled El-Rouayheb .

      Editor information

      Editors and Affiliations

      Rights and permissions

      Reprints and permissions

      Copyright information

      © 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

      About this entry

      Cite this entry

      El-Rouayheb, K. (2017). Logic in the Arabic and Islamic World. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_303-2

      Download citation

      • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_303-2

      • Received:

      • Accepted:

      • Published:

      • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

      • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

      • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

      • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

      Publish with us

      Policies and ethics