Abstract
The Arabic logical tradition emerged from the Graeco-Arabic translation movement from the eighth to the tenth centuries. In its initial stages, it was closely linked to the activity of translating and commenting upon Aristotle’s Organon. By the early tenth century, a circle of Aristotelian scholars had emerged in Baghdad who saw themselves as a continuation of the Alexandrian tradition. Its most prominent representative was undoubtedly Al-Fārābī (d. 950), who wrote esteemed commentaries on Aristotle’s logical works, as well as a number of treatises introducing logic (manṭiq) to an environment that often viewed the Greek sciences with suspicion. The influence of the Baghdad circle eventually reached Islamic Spain, where Aristotelian philosophy and logic flourished in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, culminating in the monumental commentaries on Aristotle by Averroes (d. 1198). In other parts of the Islamic world, however, the influence emanating from Avicenna (d. 1037) eventually superseded that of Aristotle. Avicenna was less concerned with getting the interpretation of Aristotle right and more willing to make radical departures from the Aristotelian tradition. By the thirteenth century, his works had replaced those of Aristotle as the point of reference for most logicians writing in Arabic. The prominent theologian Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 1210) approached the Avicennian tradition with the same irreverence with which Avicenna had himself approached the Aristotelian tradition. He also decisively reoriented the scope of logic toward a focused study of terms, propositions, and syllogisms, rather than the entirety of topics covered in the Organon. A number of thirteenth-century logicians working in the wake of Avicenna and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī produced sophisticated and original summas of formal logic. They also produced a number of condensed handbooks that formed the basis of logical studies at colleges throughout the Islamic world until modern times.
References
Primary Sources
Editions
Abharī Athīr al-Dīn. (1877). Īsāġūjī. Printed with the commentary of Fenārī and the glosses of Ḳūl Aḥmed Matbaʿat Akhtar, Istanbul.
al-Fārābī. (1985–1987). al-Manṭiq ʿinda l-Fārābī (3 vols.; ed.: al-ʿAjam, R.). Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq.
al-Fārābī. (1989). al-Manṭiqiyyāt li-l-Fārābī (3 vols.; ed.: Danishpazhuh, M. T.). Qum: Matbaʿat Ayatollah al-Mar'ashi al-Najafi.
al-Rāzī Fakhr al-Dīn. (2003). Manṭiq al-Mulakhkhaṣ (eds.: Karamaleki, A. F., & Asgharinezhad, A.). Tehran: ISU Press.
al-Rāzī Fakhr al-Dīn. (2005). Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt (Vol. 1 (logic); ed.: Najafzada, A.). Tehran: Anjuman-i Asar ve Mafakhir-i Farhangi.
Bihārī Muḥibbullāh. (1910–1911). Sullam al-ʿulūm. Lithographed with the commentaries of Gōpamāwī and Sandīlī. Matbaʿat al-Mujtabaʿi, Delhi.
Ferrari, C. (2006). Die Kategorienkommentar von Abū l-Farağ ʿ Abdallāh ibn aṭ-Ṭayyib: Text und Untersuchungen. Leiden: Brill.
Ibn Rushd. (1978). Talkhīṣ Kitāb al-ʿIbāra (eds.: Butterworth, C., & Harīdī, A. A.). Cairo: al-Hayʿa al-Misriyya al-ʿamma li-l-kitab.
Ibn Rushd. (1979). Talkhīṣ Kitāb al-Jadal (eds.: Butterworth, C., & Harīdī, A. A.). Cairo: al-Hayʿa al-Misriyya al-ʿamma li-l-kitab.
Ibn Rushd (1983) Talkīṣ Kitāb al-Qiyās (eds.: Butterworth, C., & Harīdī, A. A.). Cairo: al-Hayʿa al-Misriyya al-ʿamma li-l-kitab.
Ibn Sīnā. (1952ff.) al-Shifā’ (Multi-volume eds.: el-Khodeiri, M., Anawati, G., Madkour, I., et al.). Cairo: Ministry of Culture.
Ibn Sīnā. (1957–1958). al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt. Printed in three volumes (the first on logic) with the commentary of Ṭūṣī and the glosses of Taḥtānī. Qum: Matbaʿat al-Haydari.
Kātibī Najm al-Dīn. (1905). al-Risāla al-Shamsiyya. Printed in two volumes with the commentary of Taḥtānī and the glosses of Jurjānī, Siyālkūtī, and ʿAdawī. Cairo: al-Matbaʿa al-Amiriyya.
Khūnajī Afḍal al-Dīn (2010) Kashf al-asrār ʿan ġawāmiḍ al-afkār (ed.: El-Rouayheb, K.). Berlin/Tehran: Institute for Islamic Studies & Iranian Institute of Philosophy.
Qaramaleki, A. (Ed.). (2007). Twelve treatises on liar paradox in Shiraz school. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy.
Sanūsī Muḥammad b. Yūsuf. (1875). Sharḥ al-Mukhtaṣar fī l-manṭiq. Cairo.
Taftāzānī Saʿd al-Dīn. (1988). Tahdhīb al-manṭiq. Printed with the commentary of Mullā ʿAbdullāh al-Yazdī. Beirut: Muʿassasat Ahl al-Bayt.
Urmawī Sirāj al-Dīn. (1861). Maṭāliʿ al-anwār. Printed with the commentary of Taḥtānī and the glosses of Jurjānī. Istanbul: Matbaʿa-i Amire.
Translations
Ahmed, A. (2010). Avicenna: Deliverance: Logic. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
Butterworth, C. (1998). Averroes’ middle commentary on Aristotle’s categories and de interpretatione. South Bend: St. Augustine Press.
Calverley, E.E. (1933). Abhari’s Īsāġūjī fī’l-manṭiq. In The Macdonald presentation volume. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dunlop, D. M. (1958). Al-Farabi’s introductory Risala on logic. Islamic Quarterly, 3, 224–235.
Gyekye, K. (1979). Arabic logic: Ibn al-Tayyib’s commentary on Porphyry’s Eisagoge. Albany: SUNY Press.
Hallaq, W. (1993). Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek logicians. Oxford: Clarendon.
Inati, S. (1981). Avicenna: Remarks and admonitions: Part one: Logic. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Lameer, J. (2006). Conception and belief in Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy.
Rescher, N. (1963a). Al-Fārābī’s short commentary on Aristotle’s prior analytics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rosenthal, F. (1958). The Muqaddima of Ibn Khaldūn. New York: Pantheon Books.
Shehaby, N. (1973). The propositional logic of Avicenna. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Zabeeh, F. (1971). Avicenna: Treatise on logic. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Zimmermann, F. (1981). Al-Fārābī: Commentary and short treatise on Aristotle’s de interpretatione. London: British Academy & Oxford University Press.
Secondary Sources
Studies
Black, D. (1998). Logic in Islamic philosophy. In Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 5, pp. 706–713). London: Routledge.
Elamrani-Jamal, A. (1995). Ibn Rushd et les Premiers Analytiques d’Aristote: aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 5, 51–74.
El-Rouayheb, K. (2004). Sunni Islamic scholars on the status of logic, 1500–1800. Islam Law Society, 11, 213–232.
El-Rouayheb, K. (2009). Impossible antecedents and their consequences: Some thirteenth-century Arabic discussions. History and Philosophy of Logic, 30, 209–225.
El-Rouayheb, K. (2010). Relational syllogisms & the history of Arabic logic, 900–1900. Leiden: Brill.
El-Rouayheb, K. (2016). Does a proposition have three parts or four: A debate in later Arabic logic. Oriens, 44, 301–331.
Gutas, D. (1988). Avicenna and the Aristotelian tradition. Leiden: Brill.
Gutas, D. (1993). Aspects of literary form and genre in Arabic logical works. In C. Burnett (Ed.), Glosses and commentaries on Aristotelian logical texts. London: Warburg Institute.
Gutas, D. (1998). Greek thought, Arabic culture. London: Routledge.
Gutas, D. (1999). The ‘Alexandria to Baghdad’ complex of narratives. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale, 10, 155–193.
Hallaq, W. (1990). Logic, formal arguments and formalization of arguments in Sunni jurisprudence. Arabica, 87, 315–358.
Hasnawi, A. (1985). Fārābī et la practique de l’exégèse philosophique. Revue de Synthèse, 117, 27–59.
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (2004). La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque. Paris: Vrin.
Inati, S. (1996). Logic. In S. H. Nasr & O. Leaman (Eds.), History of Islamic philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 802–823). London: Routledge.
Lameer, J. (1994). Al-Farabi and Aristotelian syllogistic: Greek theory and Islamic practice. Leiden: Brill.
Lameer, J. (2014). Ghayr al-maʿlūm yamtaniʿ al-ḥukm ʿalayhi: An exploratory anthology of a false paradox in medieval Islamic philosophy. Oriens, 42, 397–453.
Madkour, I. (1969). L’Organon d’Aristote dans le monde arabe. Paris: Vrin.
Marmura, M. (1975). Ghazali’s attitude to the secular sciences and logic. In G. Hourani (Ed.), Essays in Islamic philosophy and science. Albany: SUNY Press.
Rescher, N. (1963b). Studies in the history of Arabic logic. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rescher, N. (1964). The development of Arabic logic. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Sabra, A. I. (1965). A twelfth-century defence of the fourth-figure of the syllogism. Journal Warbg Courtauld Institute, 28, 14–28.
Sabra, A. I. (1980). Avicenna on the subject-matter of logic. Journal of Philosophy, 77, 746–764.
Sabra, A. I. (1996). Situating Arabic science: Locality versus essence. Isis, 87, 654–670.
Street, T. (1995). Ṭūṣī on Avicenna’s logical connectives. History Philosophy Logic, 16, 257–268.
Street, T. (2002). An outline of Avicenna’s syllogistic. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 84, 129–160.
Street, T. (2003). Logic. In P. Adamson & R. Taylor (Eds.), Cambridge companion to Arabic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street, T. (2004). Arabic logic. In D. M. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic, vol I: Greek, Indian and Arabic logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Street, T. (2005). Faḫraddin ar-Razi’s critique of Avicennan logic. In U. Rudolph & D. Perler (Eds.), Logik und Theologie. Das Organon im arabischen und im lateinischen Mittelalter. Leiden: Brill.
Street, T. (2008). Arabic and Islamic philosophy of language and logic. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/arabic-islamic-language/
Strobino, R., & Thom, P. (2016). The logic of modality. In C. Dutilh-Novaes & S. Read (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to medieval logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thom, P. (2008). Logic and metaphysics in Avicenna’s modal syllogistic. In S. Rahman, T. Street, & H. Tahiri (Eds.), The unity of science in the Arabic tradition: Metaphysics, logic and epistemology and their interactions. Dordrecht: Springer.
Watt, J. (2009). Al-Farabi and the history of the Syruac Organon. In G. Kiraz (Ed.), Malphono w-Rabo d-Malphone: Studies in honor of Sebastian P. Brock (pp. 751–778). Piscataway: Gorgias Press.
Wisnovsky, R. (2004). The nature and scope of Arabic philosophical commentary in post-classical (ca.1100–1900) Islamic intellectual history: Some preliminary observations. In P. Adamson, H. Balthussen, & M. W. F. Stone (Eds.), Philosophy, science and exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin commentaries (Vol. 2, pp. 149–191). London: Institute of Advanced Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
El-Rouayheb, K. (2017). Logic in the Arabic and Islamic World. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_303-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_303-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities