Skip to main content

Abstract

In 1958 the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) promoted its vision of television’s future with an image of a stylishly modern home (Fig. 3.1). Equipped with a “picture frame” flat screen TV mounted on a wall near a huge picture window, the living room was overcome by the postwar dream of TV leisure where views of the outside world (gleaming through the window) were now competing with virtual views on the TV screen. Adding to the attractions of this domestic utopia are a “television control unit” and a mini-fridge on wheels so that the residents are spared the quotidian “challenges” of simply moving around. As the RCA promotional rhetoric suggests, television offers a new and thoroughly modern form of spectacular intimacy where the virtual and the material co-exist, and where the object world is easily manipulated through technical and architectural tricks that allow for (at least the fantasy of) mastery over the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Histories of television’s installation in homes is a relatively recent phenomenon, and to date there is no single comparative historical study of this on a transnational level. My effort to do so here, therefore, is based on my preliminary attempts to merge some of these studies. I want to thank generous colleagues for either translating or sharing essays, findings, and resources, especially Mirta Varela, Cecile Panati, William Uricchio, and Judith Keilbach.

  2. 2.

    For an excellent analysis of the rise of the suburban family sitcom see Haralovich (1992). Note, however, that television programs, including family sitcoms, also offered more critical perspectives via allegories of suburban alienation, racism, and isolation for women. See for example, Chapter 4 (“Static and Stasis”) in Sconce (2004) and Chapter 4 (“From Domestic Space to Outer Space: The 1960s Fantastic Family Sitcom”) in Spigel (2001).

  3. 3.

    Note that such confusions between material space and media space, and the jokes about this, were not new to television. As Carolyn Marvin (1988) observes, these kind of jokes circulated in the trade journals of electrical engineers, who often specifically poked fun at children, women, and people of color who they depicted as “technical illiterates” who were unable to distinguish material from electrical spaces.

  4. 4.

    See www.samsung.com/ae/consumer/tv-audio-video/home-theatre. Retrieved June 1, 2010.

  5. 5.

    For the ad see http://www.tvhistory.tv/1950s-Siemens-TV-Ad-Germany.JPG. Retrieved May 1, 2010.

  6. 6.

    For the ad see http://www.samsung.com/us/2013-smart-tv/\#smart-tv-4. Retrieved June 1, 2010.

  7. 7.

    For the ad see http://library.duke.edu/digitalcollections/adaccess_TV0445/. Retrieved July 19, 2013.

  8. 8.

    For analysis of cooking shows along these lines see Strange (1998) and Bell and Hollows (2007). There is also a growing body of literature on television’s depictions of places that considers, for example, the racial dynamics of TV cities in dramatic programs like The Wire or the identity politics of regional location. See, for example Lipsitz (2011) and Johnson (2008).

  9. 9.

    Felski also observes that feminist theorists (she names, for example, Betty Friedan) have also often denigrated the home as have classic writers on everyday life such as Henri Lefebvre. Regarding the latter, it is also the case that while I am generally drawing on Lefebvre’s (1991) important insights about the social production of space, and while his volumes on everyday life are central to any consideration of the topic, he saw television in negative terms as a source of alienation. Particularly apropos to my discussion here, see his 1958 Introduction to the first volume of Critique of Everyday Life where he calls television as “leisure machine” that is part of a more general conversion of “spontaneous” social needs into a form of “social organization” that modifies and directs those needs. In the same passage his also uses the phrase “armchair reading” negatively with regard to “escapist” mass culture items like “travel books” or “reader’s digests,” and he especially names “images” in “films…which are as far from real life as possible.” (Lefebvre 1958; reprinted 1991, pp. 32–33, emphasis his).

  10. 10.

    For a classic discussion of mass culture’s association with tropes of femininity and passivity see Andreas Huyssen’s chapter “Mass Culture as Woman: Modernism’s Other” in Huyssen (1986).

  11. 11.

    It’s also important to point out however, that feminists have also often objected to television and seen it as a source of boredom or an outright tool of patriarchy for women’s domestic confinement and role as consumer. Outright attacks on the medium especially ran through feminist writing of the early second wave, such as Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique (1963) and specifically in a series of articles published in TV Guide (Friedan 1964). By the late 1970s, and especially with the rise of feminist film theory and cultural studies, feminists developed a much more varied literature that (while still holding onto a negative critique) also understood television’s relation to women’s pleasure and to their everyday lives in more diverse and complex ways. For a bibliography see Brunsdon and Spigel (2007).

  12. 12.

    Morley draws especially on Moore (1997) and Green (1998).

  13. 13.

    See http://www.mobitv.com. Retrieved August 4, 2013.

  14. 14.

    Itself a spatial metaphor, the term “vast wasteland” (which was coined in 1961 by Newton Minow, the Chair of the Federal Communications Commission) uses the title of T.S. Elliot’s poem to encapsulate the ruinous (and over-commercialized) state of US TV in that period. For his full speech see Minow (1961).

  15. 15.

    In making this observation Morley draws upon Massey (1997).

References

  • A room that does everything. American Home (May 1951), no author, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abaza, M. (2013). In J. Harbord, C. Berry, & R. Moore (Eds.), Public space, media space (Chapter 4, E-book edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (2004). Dramas of nationhood: The politics of television in Egypt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Acland, C. (2009). Curtains, carts and the mobile screen. Screen, 50(1), 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. (1951). Cyclops…the nature of a new household pet. Interiors CX, 12(July), 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. (1983). The social matrix of television: Invention in the United States. In E. A. Kaplan (Ed.), Regarding television: Critical approaches—An anthology (pp. 109–119). Frederick: University Publications of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allon, F. (2004). An ontology of everyday control: Space, media flows and ‘smart’ living in the absolute present. In A. McCarthy & N. Couldry (Eds.), Mediaspace: Place, scale and culture in a media age (pp. 253–274). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, M. (2007). I Spy: Surveillance and power in the interactive age. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, I. (1995). Living room wars: Rethinking media audiences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, I. (2004). The cultural intimacy of TV drama. In K. Iwabuchi (Ed.), Feeling Asian modernities: Transnational consumption of Japanese TV dramas (pp. 303–310). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslinger, B. (2013). Make room for the Wii. In J. Hartley & J. Burgess (Eds.), A companion to new media dynamics (pp. 209–219). West Sussex: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: An introduction to supermodernity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausinger, H. (1984). Media, technology and daily life. Media, Culture, and Society, 6(4), 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., & Hollows, J. (2007). Mobile homes. Space and Culture, 10(1), 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1936; reprint. 1969). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In W. Benjamin (Ed.), Illuminations: Essays and reflections (H. Arendt, Trans., pp. 217–252). New York; Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernold, M., & Ellmeier, A. (1997). Addressing the public: Television, consumption and the family in Austria in the 1950s and 1960s. In M. Nava, A. Blake, I. MacRury, & B. Richards (Eds.), Buy this book: Studies in advertising and consumption (pp. 4551–4881). New York: Routledge. ebook location.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, W. (1989). Fifties television: The industry and its critics. Champaign Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, W. (2004). New media and the popular imagination: Launching television, radio, and digital media in the United States. London: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, W. (2011). Is it TV yet? The dislocated screens of television in a mobile digital culture. In J. Bennett & N. Strange (Eds.), Television as digital media (pp. 76–104). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, L. (1956). The age of television: A study of viewing habits and the impact of television on American life. New York: Frederick Unger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdon, J. (2004). Live television is still alive. In R. C. Allen & A. Hill (Eds.), The television studies reader (pp. 182–195). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsdon, C., & Spigel, L. (2008). Feminist television criticism: A reader. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, M. (2004). ‘To each their own bubble’: Mobile spaces of sound in the city. In Couldry & McCarthy (Eds.), Mediaspace (pp. 275–293). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. H. (2009). Connected presence in distributed family life. New Media and Society, 11(3), 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauser, G. (2013). Stunning outdoor house. www.electronichouse.com/article/stunning_outdoor_theater_highlights_florida_home) (July 11 online issue) Retrieved July 20, 2013.

  • Colomina, B. (2001). Enclosed by images: The Eameses’ multimedia architecture. Grey Room, 2(Winter), 6–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2000). The place of media power: Pilgrims and witnesses of the media age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, S., Papastergiadis, N., & McQuire, S. (2008). Transient media. Public, 37, 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith, K., & Hamilton, P. (2012). Part of the family: Australian histories of television, migration and memory. In K. Darian-Smith & S. Turnbull (Eds.), Remembering television: Histories, technologies, memories (pp. 30–51). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. (2007). “Little players, big shows” format, narration, and style on television’s new smaller screens. Convergence, 13(3), 213–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M. (1984; reprinted 1994) The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felski, R. (1999). The invention of everyday life. New Formations, 39, 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, J. (1983). The concept of live television: Ontology as ideology. In E. A. Kaplan (Ed.), Regarding television (pp. 12–22). Los Angeles: The American Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuqua, J. (2012). Prescription TV: Therapeutic discourse in the hospital and at home. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune Editors. (1955). “30 billion for fun” Reprinted (1958). In E. Larrabee & R. Meyerson (Eds.), Mass leisure (pp. 161–172). Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. Television and the feminine mystique. February 1–8, pp. 273–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, S. (1983). The pleasures of the hearth: The making of BBC light entertainment. In T. Bennett & F. Jameson (Eds.), Formations of pleasure (pp. 101–123). London: Routledge and Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauntlett, D., & Hill, A. (1999). TV living: Television, culture, and everyday life. London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilfillan, S. C. (1912, October 17). The future home theater. The Independent, 886–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, M. (1995). Television, ethnicity, and cultural change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. (1992). Video playtime: The gendering of leisure technology. London: Comedia.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (1998). Communications and the construction of community: Consuming the remote commercial television service in Western Australia. Unpublished PhD thesis, Murdoch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadj-Moussa, R. (2010). The unpredictable and the irreversible: Satellite television in the Algerian public arena. In C. Berry, S. Kim, & L. Spigel (Eds.), Electronic elsewheres: Media, technology and social space (pp. 117–136). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralovich, M. (1992). Sitcoms and suburbs: Positioning the 1950s homemaker. In L. Spigel & D. Mann (Eds.), Private screenings: Television and the female consumer (pp. 111–141). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbord, J., & Dillon, T. (2013). Encountering screen art on the London underground. In C. Berry, J. Harbord, & R. Moore (Eds.), Public space, media space, Chapter 8, E-book edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1999). Uses of television. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, D. (2008). A small world: Smart houses and the dream of the perfect day. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, A. (1986). After the great divide: Modernism, mass culture, postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V. (2008). Heartland TV: Primetime television and the struggle for US identity. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingler, B. (2006). Beyond the multiplex: Cinema, new technologies, and the home. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriem, M. S. (2009). “Mobile telephony in morocco: A changing sociality”, media. Culture & Society, 31(4), 617–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. (2005). Ghandi meets primetime: Globalization and nationalism in Indian television. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal, O. F. (1990). Popular taste and erudite repertoire: The place and space of television in Brazil. Cultural Studies, 4(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre. (1958; reprinted 1991). Critique of everyday life (Vol. I, J. Moore, Trans.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, G. (1992). The meaning of memory: Family, class, and ethnicity in early network television programs. In L. Spigel & D. Mann (Eds.), Private screenings (pp. 71–108). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, G. (2011). How racism takes place. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lull, J. (Ed.). (1988). World families watch television. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lull, J. (1990). Inside family viewing. London: Comedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankekar, P. (1999). Screening culture/viewing politics: An ethnography of television, womanhood, and nation in postcolonial India. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1991). Flexible sexism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 9(1), 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, A. (2000). Ambient television. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonagh, E. C., et al. (1956). Television and the family. Sociology and Social Research, 40(4), 117–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1962). The Guttenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2009). Stuff. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minow, N. (1961, May 9) “The vast wasteland,” address to the thirty-ninth annual convention of the national association of broadcasters. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modleski, T. (1983). The rhythms of reception: Daytime television and women’s work. In Kaplan (Ed.), Regarding television (pp. 67–75). Los Angeles: AFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M., Sedgwick, E., Gianni, B., & Weir, S. (1994). Queers on single family space. Assemblage, 24, 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. (1997). Satellite television and everyday life. Luton: University of Luton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. (2004). The doubling of place: Electronic media, time-space arrangements and social relationships. In McCarthy & Couldry (Eds.), Mediaspace (pp. 21–36). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. (1985). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. (1991). Where the global meets the local: Notes from the sitting room. Screen, 54(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. (2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. (2007). Media, modernity and technology: The geography of the new (pp. 199–234). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D., & Robins, K. (1995). Spaces of identity: Global media, electronic landscapes, and global media. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. (1998). Things to do with shopping centers. In M. Morris (Ed.), Too soon too late: History in popular culture (pp. 64–92). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, M. (1991). An ontology of everyday distraction: The freeway, the mall, and television. In P. Mellencamp (Ed.), Logics of television: Essays on cultural criticism (pp. 193–221). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, J. (2012). Revisiting the TV object: On the site-specific location and objecthood of the Swedish television during its inception. Television & New Media, 20(10), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, J. (2004). One commercial week: Television in Sweden prior to public service. In L. Spigel & J. Olsson (Eds.), Television after TV: Essays on a medium in transition (pp. 249–269). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, T. (1991). Memories and culture of viewing, 1950–65. In J. Corner (Ed.), Popular television in Britain: Studies in cultural history (pp. 159–181). London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascutti, E. (1997). Intimate televisions. In S. Harris & B. Berke (Eds.), Architecture of the everyday (pp. 52–54). Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penati, C. (2013). Remembering our first TV set: Personal memories as a source for television audience history. View 1:3, online at http://journal.euscreen.eu/index.php/view/rt/printerFriendly/jethc026/48. Retrieved 20 July 2013.

  • Penley, C. (1991). Time travel, primal scene, and the critical dystopia. In C. Penley, L. Lyon, S. Willis, L. Spigel, & J. Bergstrom (Eds.), Close encounters: Film, feminism, and science fiction (pp. 63–82). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. (2007). Healthy for family life: Television, masculinity, and domestic modernity during West Germany’s miracle years. German History, 24(4), 560–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postill, J. (1998). Little by little, a national subculture is made: The role of modern media in the institutional transformation of Iban Society, Unpublished Paper, Department of Anthropology, University College London. Cited in Morley, Home Territories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, R. (1957). Suggestions to cut down home noise. New York Times, 21, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, D. (1954). Recreation and the recreationist. Marriage and Family Living, 16(1), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles, E. A. (2012). The crystal cathedral: Architecture for mediated congregation. Public Culture, 24(3), 577–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth-Ey, K. (2007). Finding home for television in the USSR, 1950–1970. Slavic Review, 66(2), 278–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scannell, P. (1996). Radio, television and modern life. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sconce, J. (2004). Static and stasis. In J. Sconce (Ed.), Haunted media: Electronic presence from telegraphy to television (Chapter 4). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. M. (2012). Domesticating television: Changing attitudes in postwar Britain. Interiors, 3(1–2), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, L. (1992). Make room for TV: Television and the family ideal in postwar America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, L. (2001). Welcome to the dreamhouse: Popular media and postwar suburbs. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, L. (2005). Designing the smart house: Conspicuous production and posthuman domesticity. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(4), 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, L. (2009). TV by design: Modern art and the rise of network television. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, L. (2012). Object lessons for the media home: From storagewalls to invisible design. Public Culture, 24(3), 535–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, L., & Dawson, M. (2009). Television and digital media. In M. Halliwell & C. Morley (Eds.), American thought and culture in the 21st century (pp. 209–318). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, N. (1998). Perform, educate, entertain: Ingredients of the cookery programme genre. In C. Gheraghty & D. Lusted (Eds.), The television studies book (pp. 101–112). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., & Wang, W. (2010). The fading glory of the television and telephone. Pew Research, Social and Demographic Trends. Retrieved September 1, 2001, from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/08/19/the-fading-glory-of-the-television-and-telephone/

  • Thomlinson, J. (2001). Instant access: Some cultural implications of ‘globalizing’ technologie (University of Copenhagen: Global Media Cultures Working Paper No. 13). Copenhagen: Department of Film & Media Studies, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomlinson, J. (2007). The culture of speed: The coming of immediacy (Ebook edition). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichi, C. (1992). Electronic hearth: Creating an American television culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ureta, S. (2008). There is one in every home’: Finding the place of television in new homes among a low-income population in Santiago, Chile. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(4), 477–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uricchio, W. (1989). Rituals of reception, patterns of neglect: Nazi television and its historical representation. Wide Angle, 11(1), 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2012, April). Households and families: 2010. 2010 Census briefs. https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-14.pdf

  • Varela, M. (2005). La televisión criolla. Desde sus inicios hasta la llegada del hombre a la Luna, 1951–1969. Buenos Aires: EDHASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, M. (2014, February 23) personal email to Lynn Spigel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1989). The last vehicle. In D. Kamper & C. Wulf (Eds.), Looking back at the end of the world (D. Antal, Trans.). New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S. L. (1954, January 6). The task ahead: Making TV the ‘shining center of the home,’ and helping create a new society of adults. Variety, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1975). Television, technology and cultural form. New York: Schocken Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yader, D. (2013, July 31). Hackers expose how connected toilets, heaters, and lightbulbs are at risk. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 10, 2013, from online.wsj.com/…/SB10001424127887323997004578640310932033772.html

  • Yoshimi, S. (1999). ‘Made in Japan’: The cultural politics of home electrification in postwar Japan. Media, Culture & Society, 21(2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, B. M. (2007). The disappearance and reappearance and disappearance of the player in videogame advertising. Authors & Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA), situated play. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2007 conference. Online at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.190.2888&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Retrieved 14, June, 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn Spigel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spigel, L. (2015). TV and the Spaces of Everyday Life. In: Mains, S., Cupples, J., Lukinbeal, C. (eds) Mediated Geographies and Geographies of Media. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9969-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics