Skip to main content

Embodied Signs: Expanding Representations Through and with Bodies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

We argue that a semiotic perspective is urgently needed to understand how embodiment blurs binaries such as language and action or text and context through representations of bodies and representations with bodies. Although the study of embodiment has long been present in semiotics, we consider emerging research in literacy studies that reconceptualizes the intersection of body, meanings, and representation. The embodiment of meaning through representations of the body and representations through the body is often just a potentiality or a possibility, a data source that is available for selection, whereas we see it as central to the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldt, G. M. 2006. Resistance, loss, and love in learning to read: A psychoanalytic inquiry. Research in the Teaching of English 40 (3): 272–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power (trans: G. Raymond and M. Adamson). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brougère, G. 2006. Toy houses: A socio-anthropological approach to analysing objects. Visual Communication 5 (1): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, V. 2003. ‘I’m in a bad mood. Let’s go shopping’: Interactive dolls, consumer culture and a ‘glocalized’ model of literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 3 (1): 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helskinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. 1996. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiso, M. P. 2011. Playing with/through non-fiction texts: Young children authoring their relationships with history. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 11 (4). doi:10.1177/1468798411430093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göncü, A., and F. Kessler. 1988. Preschoolers’ collaborative construction in planning and maintaining imaginative play. International Journal of Behavioral Development 11 (3): 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse strategies, 1 vol. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, W. F. 1996. Language and communicative practices. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R., and G. Kress. 1988. Social semiotics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., W. Lachicotte, D. Skinner, and C. Cain. 1998. Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. H. 1995. Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. Washington: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. 2005. Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space, and culture in electronic discourse. In Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis, eds.S Norris and R. H. Jones, 141–154. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. 2009. The multilingual subject. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. 1993. Genre as social process. In The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing, eds.B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 22–37. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. 1977. Activity and consciousness, philosophy in the USSR, problems of dialectical materialism. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. 1997. Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In Literacy in society, eds. R. Hasan and G. Williams, 308–337. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, M. 2007. Literacies across media: Playing the text. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J., ed. 2005. Ritual, performance, and identity construction: Young children’s engagement with popular cultural and media texts. In Popular culture, new media and digital literacy in early childhood, 28–50. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, B. L. 2009. Ventriloquation in discussions of student writing. Research in the Teaching of English 44 (1): 52–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. 1997. Pretend play as improvisation: Conversation in the preschool classroom. Norwood: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. 2001. Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., and S. W. Scollon. 2004. Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging Internet. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M., S. Kontovourki, S. Schmier, and G. Enriquez. 2008. Literacy in motion: A case study of a shape-shifting kindergartener. Language Arts 86 (2): 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M., and D. W. Rowe. 2011. Webs of significance. Semiotic perspectives on text. In Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts, eds. D. Lapp and D. Fisher, 202–207. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkuehler, C. A., R. W. Black, and K. A. Clinton. 2005. Researching literacy as tool, place, and way of being. Reading Research Quarterly 40 (1): 90–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. 1995. Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography, and education. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. 1996. The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. 1935/1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. 2008. Play as a literacy of possibilities: Expanding meanings in practices, materials, and spaces. Language Arts 86 (2): 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. 2009. Early adopters: Playing new literacies and pretending new technologies in print-centric classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 9 (2): 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. 2011a. Mapping modes in children's play and design: An action-oriented approach to critical multimodal analysis. In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education, ed. R Rogers. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. 2011b. Playing their way into literacies: Reading, writing, and belonging in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. 2012. The boys who would be princesses: Playing with gender identity intertexts in Disney Princess transmedia. Gender and Education 24 (6): 593–610. doi:10.1080/09540253.2012.674495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth Lewis Samuelson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Samuelson, B., Wohlwend, K. (2015). Embodied Signs: Expanding Representations Through and with Bodies. In: Trifonas, P. (eds) International Handbook of Semiotics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics