Skip to main content

An Evaluation of Risk Management and Emergency Management. Relying on the Concept of Comprehensive Vulnerability Management for an Integrated Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risk Governance

Abstract

Disaster researchers and professional emergency managers have historically been constrained by prior concepts and our failure to understand the implications of alternate theoretical perspectives. The notion of risk management is proactive and addresses risk identification, risk assessment, and risk treatment. However, it does not really provide guidance during the crisis period of disasters or the process of recovery. In contrast, emergency management has traditionally focused on preparedness and response issues while ignoring the need to reduce the occurrence or impact of disasters. This chapter discusses these epistemological problems and then explores how the concept of comprehensive vulnerability management may help bridge the gap between proactive and reactive approaches to disasters. In particular, the chapter argues that the concepts of liability reduction and capacity building may help to unify the disparate views espoused by both scholars and professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biocca, M. 2005. Risk communication and the precautionary principle. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 11: 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, B.W., L.G. Canton, C.L. Cwiak, K.C. Goss, D.A. McEntire, L. Newsome, M.D. Selves, E.A. Sorchik, K. Stenson, J.E. Turner III, W.L. Waugh Jr., and D. West. 2007. Principles of emergency management. Retrieved October 25, 2011, from FEMA, Higher Education Program. http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/emprinciples.asp.

  • Ekici, S., and D.A. McEntire. 2007. Reassessing FEMA and its role in preparing the nation: Recommendations to respond effectively to disasters. In Understanding terrorism, ed. H. Durmaz, B. Sevinc, A.S. Yayla, and S. Ekici, 344–351. Fairfax: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, P.K., and H.K. Kunreuther. 1994. Environmental risk through insurance. Norwell: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L. 1999. Risk perception, social trust, and public participation in strategic decision making: Implications for emerging technologies. Ambio 28(6): 569–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilescu, M. 2002. Risk assessment and management. Tools for sustainable development. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 1(1): 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddow, G.D., and J.A. Bullock. 2006. Introduction to emergency management, 2nd ed. New York: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, A. 2000. Emergency risk management. Risk Management 2(4): 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoetmer, G.J. 1991. Introduction. In Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government, ed. G.J. Hoetmer and T.E. Drabek, xvii–xxxiv. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. 2004. Risk management: The talking cure. Organization 11(2): 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloman, H.F. 2000. Risk management standards. Risk management reports. www.riskreports.com/standards.html

  • Kunreuther, H. 2002. Risk analysis and risk management in an uncertain world. Risk Analysis 22(4): 655–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H. 2006. Risk and reaction: Dealing with interdependencies. Harvard International Review 28(3): 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D.A. 2004. Implementing a new approach to emergency management: Managing our vulnerability to reduce the occurrence and impact of disasters. ASPEP Journal 11: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D.A. 2005. Why vulnerability matters: Exploring the merit of an inclusive disaster reduction concept. Disaster Prevention and Management 14(2): 206–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D.A. 2006. Local emergency management organizations. In Handbook of disaster research, ed. H. Rodriguez, E.L. Quarantelli, and R.R. Dynes, 168–182. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D.A. 2009a. Revolutionary and evolutionary change in emergency management. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning 4(1): 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D.A. 2009b. Introduction to homeland security: Understanding terrorism with an emergency management perspective. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D.A., C. Fuller, C.W. Johnson, and R. Weber. 2002. A comparison of disaster paradigms: The search for a holistic policy guide. Public Administration Review 62(3): 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D.A., G. Crocker, C. Peters, and E. Peters. 2010. Addressing vulnerability through an integrated approach. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 1(1): 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayachi, K. 2000. Do people actually pursue risk elimination in environmental risk management? Risk Analysis 20(5): 705–711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Fire Protection Association. 2007. NFPA 1600: Standards on emergency manage-ment/business continuity programs. Retrieved on October 25, 2011, from http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files/pdf/nfpa1600.pdf.

  • O’Brien, G., P. O’Kefe, Z. Gadema, and J. Swords. 2010. Approaching disaster management through social learning. Disaster Prevention and Management 19(4): 498–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, J.C. 2009. Natural hazards analysis: Reducing the impact of disaster. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattner, Th. 2005. Modeling public risk evaluation of natural hazards: A conceptual approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 5: 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., and M.W. Seeger. 2005. Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrating model. Journal of Health Communication 10: 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, C.B. 2007. Emergency management: The American experience 1900–2005. Fairfax: PERI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikich, G.W. 1996. Emergency management planning handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, S., and J.H. Svara. 2009. Assessing and managing environmental risk: Connecting local government management with emergency management. Public Administration Review 69(2): 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchankova, L. 2002. Risk identification. Basic stage in risk management. Environmental Management and Health 13(3): 290–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K.J. 1999. Toward a critical sociology of risk. Sociological Forum 14(2): 215–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K.J. 2006. Recent developments in U.S. Homeland Security policies. In Handbook of disaster research, ed. H. Rodriguez, E.L. Quarantelli, and R.R. Dynes, 405–412. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh Jr., W.L. 2000. Living with hazards: Dealing with disasters: An introduction to emergency management. Armonk: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. McEntire .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McEntire, D.A. (2015). An Evaluation of Risk Management and Emergency Management. Relying on the Concept of Comprehensive Vulnerability Management for an Integrated Perspective. In: Fra.Paleo, U. (eds) Risk Governance. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9328-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics