Abstract
Disaster researchers and professional emergency managers have historically been constrained by prior concepts and our failure to understand the implications of alternate theoretical perspectives. The notion of risk management is proactive and addresses risk identification, risk assessment, and risk treatment. However, it does not really provide guidance during the crisis period of disasters or the process of recovery. In contrast, emergency management has traditionally focused on preparedness and response issues while ignoring the need to reduce the occurrence or impact of disasters. This chapter discusses these epistemological problems and then explores how the concept of comprehensive vulnerability management may help bridge the gap between proactive and reactive approaches to disasters. In particular, the chapter argues that the concepts of liability reduction and capacity building may help to unify the disparate views espoused by both scholars and professionals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biocca, M. 2005. Risk communication and the precautionary principle. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 11: 261–266.
Blanchard, B.W., L.G. Canton, C.L. Cwiak, K.C. Goss, D.A. McEntire, L. Newsome, M.D. Selves, E.A. Sorchik, K. Stenson, J.E. Turner III, W.L. Waugh Jr., and D. West. 2007. Principles of emergency management. Retrieved October 25, 2011, from FEMA, Higher Education Program. http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/emprinciples.asp.
Ekici, S., and D.A. McEntire. 2007. Reassessing FEMA and its role in preparing the nation: Recommendations to respond effectively to disasters. In Understanding terrorism, ed. H. Durmaz, B. Sevinc, A.S. Yayla, and S. Ekici, 344–351. Fairfax: IOS Press.
Freeman, P.K., and H.K. Kunreuther. 1994. Environmental risk through insurance. Norwell: Kluwer.
Frewer, L. 1999. Risk perception, social trust, and public participation in strategic decision making: Implications for emerging technologies. Ambio 28(6): 569–574.
Gavrilescu, M. 2002. Risk assessment and management. Tools for sustainable development. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 1(1): 3–20.
Haddow, G.D., and J.A. Bullock. 2006. Introduction to emergency management, 2nd ed. New York: Butterworth Heinemann.
Hodges, A. 2000. Emergency risk management. Risk Management 2(4): 7–18.
Hoetmer, G.J. 1991. Introduction. In Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government, ed. G.J. Hoetmer and T.E. Drabek, xvii–xxxiv. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
Holt, R. 2004. Risk management: The talking cure. Organization 11(2): 251–270.
Kloman, H.F. 2000. Risk management standards. Risk management reports. www.riskreports.com/standards.html
Kunreuther, H. 2002. Risk analysis and risk management in an uncertain world. Risk Analysis 22(4): 655–664.
Kunreuther, H. 2006. Risk and reaction: Dealing with interdependencies. Harvard International Review 28(3): 38–42.
McEntire, D.A. 2004. Implementing a new approach to emergency management: Managing our vulnerability to reduce the occurrence and impact of disasters. ASPEP Journal 11: 1–7.
McEntire, D.A. 2005. Why vulnerability matters: Exploring the merit of an inclusive disaster reduction concept. Disaster Prevention and Management 14(2): 206–222.
McEntire, D.A. 2006. Local emergency management organizations. In Handbook of disaster research, ed. H. Rodriguez, E.L. Quarantelli, and R.R. Dynes, 168–182. New York: Springer.
McEntire, D.A. 2009a. Revolutionary and evolutionary change in emergency management. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning 4(1): 69–85.
McEntire, D.A. 2009b. Introduction to homeland security: Understanding terrorism with an emergency management perspective. New York: Wiley.
McEntire, D.A., C. Fuller, C.W. Johnson, and R. Weber. 2002. A comparison of disaster paradigms: The search for a holistic policy guide. Public Administration Review 62(3): 267–281.
McEntire, D.A., G. Crocker, C. Peters, and E. Peters. 2010. Addressing vulnerability through an integrated approach. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 1(1): 50–64.
Nakayachi, K. 2000. Do people actually pursue risk elimination in environmental risk management? Risk Analysis 20(5): 705–711.
National Fire Protection Association. 2007. NFPA 1600: Standards on emergency manage-ment/business continuity programs. Retrieved on October 25, 2011, from http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files/pdf/nfpa1600.pdf.
O’Brien, G., P. O’Kefe, Z. Gadema, and J. Swords. 2010. Approaching disaster management through social learning. Disaster Prevention and Management 19(4): 498–508.
Pine, J.C. 2009. Natural hazards analysis: Reducing the impact of disaster. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Plattner, Th. 2005. Modeling public risk evaluation of natural hazards: A conceptual approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 5: 357–366.
Reynolds, B., and M.W. Seeger. 2005. Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrating model. Journal of Health Communication 10: 43–55.
Rubin, C.B. 2007. Emergency management: The American experience 1900–2005. Fairfax: PERI.
Sikich, G.W. 1996. Emergency management planning handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Somers, S., and J.H. Svara. 2009. Assessing and managing environmental risk: Connecting local government management with emergency management. Public Administration Review 69(2): 181–193.
Tchankova, L. 2002. Risk identification. Basic stage in risk management. Environmental Management and Health 13(3): 290–297.
Tierney, K.J. 1999. Toward a critical sociology of risk. Sociological Forum 14(2): 215–242.
Tierney, K.J. 2006. Recent developments in U.S. Homeland Security policies. In Handbook of disaster research, ed. H. Rodriguez, E.L. Quarantelli, and R.R. Dynes, 405–412. New York: Springer.
Waugh Jr., W.L. 2000. Living with hazards: Dealing with disasters: An introduction to emergency management. Armonk: ME Sharpe.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McEntire, D.A. (2015). An Evaluation of Risk Management and Emergency Management. Relying on the Concept of Comprehensive Vulnerability Management for an Integrated Perspective. In: Fra.Paleo, U. (eds) Risk Governance. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9328-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9328-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9327-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9328-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)