Abstract
This paper explores the localisation strategies of Chinese immigrants in Belgium by means of a biographical approach. As the migrants’ life stories involve actions and reactions to the structural constraints and temporal dis/continuity of a new society, their strategies reflect how they make sense of their present situation, how they interpret cultural encounters, and how they cope with the socio-economic challenges of their host society.
The first part of the paper deals with conventional expatriate questions by asking how interviewees settled into their host society and what social, economic, and cultural consequences (Heisler, Migration theory—talking across disciplines, 2000) they experienced as Chinese citizens adapting to the European Union. In the second part of the paper, in line with the biographical approach, one interviewee’s life history is introduced and her story is told to report how a personal experience of localisation is biographically meaningful with reference to the Biographical-Narrative Interpretative Method (BNIM). The third part of the paper discusses the thematic concerns that emerged from the collected life stories, and the fourth part of the paper presents the types and variation in strategies formulated by each interviewee. The concluding section of the paper describes implications for both the theoretical and empirical levels of research and argues that a biographical approach to migration experiences can contribute to the process of policymaking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Records of personal interviews with Mr. Huang in fieldwork conducted from 1996 to 1998.
- 2.
However, some cases show that the mainlanders from Taiwan took advantage of acquired Belgian citizenship to help their families in China emigrate. Without a foreign connection, it was impossible for Chinese citizens to go abroad before 1975.
- 3.
As the pro-independent Democratic People’s Party (DPP) won the presidential election in 2000, it was in a position to enable the re-orientation of overseas Chinese policies. Many pro-nationalist overseas Chinese organizations were not satisfied with the DPP’s political stand while the long exiled pro-independence overseas Taiwanese groups started to give support to the Overseas Compatriot Affairs Committee (OCAC). The relations between OCAC and overseas Chinese and Taiwanese residents were thus challenged by the controversy surrounding Taiwanese identity, low trust, and the restructuring of power among overseas Chinese and Taiwanese organizations.
- 4.
There is an expression, ‘Come, Come, Come and Come to Tai Da (National Taiwan University), Go, Go, Go and Go to America’, directed towards capable university students, in particular students from top Taiwanese universities. Western Europe certainly was another choice, but less interesting to Taiwanese students because of language proficiency.
- 5.
Hua’s family may be characterised as a transnational network: her parents and elder sister live in Taiwan, one brother lives in Vienna, and another brother and sister settled in the United States. To facilitate communication among intra-and intergenerational family members, Mandarin is accepted by the parents as the primary domestic language by the parents.
- 6.
Interview with Ms. S, head of a government-sponsored institution for multicultural integration in 2005.
References
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benton, G., Pieke, F. N. (Eds.). (1998). The Chinese in Europe. London: Macmillan Press LTD.
Bertaux, D. (1981). Biography and society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Breckner, R. (2000). Process of reconstructing migration biographies: The experience of “return” from the West to the East of Europe after 1989. In B. Agozino (Ed.), Theoretical and methodological issues in migration research: Interdisciplinary, intergenerational and international perspective (pp. 91–106). Aldershot: Ashaget.
Breckner, R. (2002). Appendix a: Discovering biographies in changing social worlds: the biographic-interpretive method. In P Chamberlayne, M. Rustin, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), Biography and social policy in Europe: Experiences and life journeys. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Brettell, C. B. (2002). The individual/agent and culture/structure in the history of the social sciences, in social science history 26:3. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/social_science_history/v026/26.3brettell.pdf.
Brettell, C. B., Hollifield, J. F. (Eds). (2000). Migration theory—talking across disciplines. New York: Routledge.
Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (Eds.). (2000). The turn to biographical methods in social science. London: Routledge.
Chamberlayne, P., Rustin, M., & Wengraf, T. (Eds.). (2002). Biography and social exclusion in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Firkin, P., Dupuis, A., & Meares, C. (2004). New Zealand experience(s): Biographical narratives of professional migrants on working in New Zealand. Research Report Series, Labour Market Dynamics Research Programme, Massey University.
Fischer-Rosenthal, W. (2000). Biographical work and biographical structuring in present-day societies. In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), 2000a. The turn to biographical methods in social science. London: Routledge.
Giddens, A. (2001). Agency, institution, and time-space analysis’. In K. Knorr-Cetina & B. Glaser The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualisation contrasted with description. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
Glick Schiller, N., & Levitt, P. (2006). Haven’t we heard this somewhere before? A substantive view of transnational migration studies by way of a reply to Waldinger and Fitzerald. CMD Working Paper, #06-01, The Center for Migration and Development, Working Papers Series, Princeton University.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heisler, B. S. (2000). The sociology of immigration. In C. B. Brettell & J. F. Hollifield (Eds.), Migration theory—talking across disciplines. New York: Routledge.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1965). The effect of dominant kinship relationships on kin and non-kin behaviour: A Hypothesis. American Anthropologist New Series, 67(3), 638–661.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1967). Under the ancestors’ shadow—kinship, personality and social mobility in China. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1985). The self in cross-cultural perspective. In A. J. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self—asian and western perspectives. New York: Tavistock Publications.
Hwang, K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. The American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944–974.
Maines, D. R. (Ed.). (1991). Social organisation and social process. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, E. J. (1994). An evaluation of international migration theory: The North American case. Population and Development Review, 20(4), 699–751.
Miller, R. (Ed.). (2005). Biographical research methods, Vol. IV. London: Sage Publications.
Nyiri, P. (2002). Mobility, entrepreneurship and sex: How narratives of modernity help Chinese women in Hungary evade gender constraints. In P. Nyiri & I. Saveliev (Eds.), Globalizing Chinese—trends in Europe and Asia. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company
Nyiri, P. (2005). The “new migrant”: State and market constructions of modernity and patriotism. In P. Nyiri & J. Breidenbach (Eds.), China inside out. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Nyiri, P., & Saveliev, I. (Eds.). (2002). Globalizing Chinese—trends in Europe and Asia. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Pang, C. L. 1993. Tussen Inpassing En Identiteit—De Chinese Gemeenschap in Belgie. Steunpunt Migranten-Cahiers No. 6. Leuven: Leuven—Hoger Instituut voor de Arbeid, KU.
Penninx, R. (2004). Integration of migrants: Economic, social, cultural and political dimensions. Paper for European Population Forum 2004: Population Challenges and Policy Responses.
Pieke, F. N. N., Thuno, M., & Ceccagno, A. (2004). Transnational Chinese—Fujianese migrants in Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Portes, A. (Ed.). (1995). The economic sociology of immigration. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Portes, A. (1997). Immigration theory for a new century: Some problems and opportunities. International Migration Review, 31(4), 799–825.
Riemann, G. 2003a. A joint project against the backdrop of a research tradition: An introduction to “doing biographical research”. FQS, 4(3), XXX.
Riemann, G. (Ed.). (2003b). Doing biographical research [the case of Hulya]. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 4(3), XXX. http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/.
Riemann, G., & Schutze, F. (1991). “Trajectory” as a basic theoretical concept for analyzing suffering and disorderly social processes. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organisation and social process. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Rosenthal, G. (1997). National identity or multicultural autobiography: Theoretical concepts of biographical constitution grounded in case reconstructions. In A. Lieblich & R. Josselson (Eds.), The narrative study of lives: Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Rustin, M. (2002). Reflections on the biographical turn in social science. In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The turn to biographical methods in social science: Comparative issues and examples. London: Routledge.
Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers II—studies in social theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1977). The structures of the life—world. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
Serrie, H., & Hsu, F. L. K. (1985). Chinese ethnicity and the overseas Chinese. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, XVI(2), 137–142.
Thompson, P. (2000). The voice of the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waldinger, R., & Fitzgerald, D. (2004). Transnationalism in question. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1177–1195.
Wang, G. (1997). China and the Chinese overseas. Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Wengraf, T. (2000). Uncovering the general from within the particular: From contingencies to typologies in the understanding of cases. In P. Chamberlayne J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The turn to biographical methods in social sciences—comparative issues and examples. London: Routledge.
Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing—biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage Publications.
Wengraf, T. (2006). Interviewing for life histories, lived situations and experience: The biographic-narrative interpretative method (BNIM). A short guide to BNIM interviewing and practice. Version 6.5a—08/05/06.
Zou, M. (1992). Chinatown: The socioeconomic potential of an urban enclave. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Zou, M. (1997). Segmented assimilation: issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. International Migration Review, 31(4), 975–1008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu Huang, LC. (2014). A Biographical Study of Chinese Immigrants in Belgium: Strategies for Localisation. In: Zhang, J., Duncan, H. (eds) Migration in China and Asia. International Perspectives on Migration, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8759-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8759-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8758-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8759-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)