Skip to main content

Spatial Scale Effects of Climate Scenarios on Simulated Cotton Production in the Southeastern U.S.A.

  • Chapter
Issues in the Impacts of Climate Variability and Change on Agriculture

Abstract

We examine the effect of climate scenarios generated using results from climate models of different spatial resolution on yields simulated by the deterministic cotton model GOSSYM for the southeastern U.S.A. Two related climate change scenarios were used: a coarse-scale scenario produced from results of a general circulation model (GCM) which also provided the boundary conditions to a regional climate model (RCM), from which a fine-scale scenario was constructed. Cotton model simulations were performed for three cases: climate change alone; climate change and elevated CO2; climate change, elevated CO2 and adaptations to climate change. In general, significant differences in state-average projected yield changes between the coarse and fine-scale scenarios are found for these three cases. In the first two cases, different directions of change are found in some sub-regions. With adaptation, yields substantially increase for both climate scenarios, but more so for the coarse-scale scenario (30% domain-average increase). Under irrigation, yield change differences between the two climate scenarios are small in all three cases, and yields are higher under irrigation (~35% domain-average increase with adaptation case) compared to dryland conditions. For the climate change alone case, differences in summer water-stress levels explain the contrasts in dryland yield patterns between the coarse and fine-scale climate scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, R. M., McCarl, B. A., and Mearns, L. O.: 2003, ‘The Effects of Spatial Scale of Climate Scenarios on Economic Assessments: An Example from U.S. Agriculture’, Clhn. Change 60, 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albers, D. W., Mobley, J., and Tracy, P. W.: 1992, ‘Evaluation of GOSSYM-COMAX in Missouri 1987–1991’, in Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. National Cotton Council, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A., pp. 1350–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. N. and Landivar, J. A.: 1991, ‘The Simulation of Plant Development in GOSSYM’, in Hodges, T. (ed.), Predicting Crop Phenology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, M. Y. L., Porter, D. O., and McKinion, J. M.: 1993, ‘Calibration of GOSSYM: Theory and Practice’, Comput. Electron. Agric. 9, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. A. and Rosenberg, N. J.: 1999, ‘Climate Change Impacts on the Potential Productivity of Corn and Winter Wheat in their Primary United States Growing Regions’, Clim. Change 41, 73–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, G, Kiechle, W., Locke, C., Mearns, L. O., McDaniel, L., and Downton, M.: 2003, ‘Response of Soybeans and Sorghum to Varying Spatial Scales of Climate Change Scenarios in the Southeastern United States’, Clim. Change 60, 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, R. and Mearns, L.: 1999, A Comparison of Simulations of Current Climate from Two Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Global Climate Models against Observations and Evaluation of their Future Climates, Report to the National Institute for Global Environmental Change (NIGEC), Boulder CO, ESIG/NCAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudek, D. J.: 1989, ‘Climate Change Impacts upon Agriculture and Resources: A Case Study of California’, in Smith, J. and Tirpak, D. (eds.), The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States, Appendix C: Agriculture, Vol. I, EPA–230–05–89–053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, W. A., Heuer, M. L., Hunsaker, D., Kimball, B. A., Lewin, K. F., Nagy, J., and Johnson, M.: 1994, ‘Sap Flow Measurements of Transpiration from Cotton Grown under Ambient and Enriched CO2 Concentrations’, Agric. For. Meteorol. 70, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling, W., Chhetri, N., and Niu, X.: 2003, ‘Improving the Realism of Modeling Agronomic Adaptation to Climatic Change: Simulating Technological Substitution’, Clim. Change 60, 149–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felzer, B. and Heard, P.: 1999, ‘Precipitation Differences amongst GCMs Used for the U. S. National Assessment’, J. of the American Water Resources Association 35, 1327–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, F., Hewittson, B., Christensen. J., Hulme, M., Von Storch, H., Whetton, P., Jones, R., Mearns, L., and Fu, C.: 2001, ‘Regional Climate Information —Evaluation and Projections’, in Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Chapter 10, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 583–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, F., Marinucci, M. R., and Bates, G. T.: 1993, ‘Development of a Second Generation Regional Climate Model (RegCM2): Boundary Layer and Radiative Transfer Processes’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 121, 2794–2813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, F., Mearns, L. O., Shields, C., and McDaniel, L.: 1998, ‘Regional Nested Model Simulations of Present Day and 2 x CO2 Climate over the Central Plains of the U.S.’, Clim. Change 40, 457–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitay, H., Brown, S., Easterling, W., and Jallow, B.: 2001, ‘Ecosystems and their Goods and Services’, in McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Chapter 5, pp. 234–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, A. B.: 1994, ‘OZCOT: A Simulation Model for Cotton Crop Management’. Agric. Sys. 44, 257–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, H. F., Whisler, F. D., Bridges, S. M., Reddy, K. R., and McKinion, J. M.: 1998, ‘Simulation in Crop Management: GOSSYM/COMAX’, in Peart R. M. and Cuny, A. B. (eds.), Agricultural Systems Modeling and Simulation, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, U.S.A., pp. 235–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker, D. J., Hendrey, G. R., Kimball, B. A., Lewin, K. F., Mauney, J. R., and Nagy, J.: 1994, ‘Cotton Evapotranspiration under Field Conditions with CO2 Enrichment and Variable Soil Moisture Regimes’, Agric. For. Meteorol. 70, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B. S., Arkin, G. F., and Hearn, A. B.: 1998, ‘The Cotton Simulation Model “COTTAM”: Fruiting Model Calibration and Testing’, Transactions of the ASAE 31, 846–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, B. A., LaMorte, R. L., Seay, R. S., Pinter, P. J. Jr., Rokey, R. R., Hunsaker, D. J., Dugas, W. A., Heuer, M. L., Mauney, J. R., Hendrey, G. R., Lewin, K. F., and Nagy, J.: 1994, ‘Effects of Free-Air CO2 Enrichment on Energy Balance and Evapotranspiration of Cotton’, Agric. For. Meteorol. 70, 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, B. A. and Mauney, J. R.: 1993, ‘Response of Cotton to Varying CO2, Irrigation, and Nitrogen: Yyield and Growth’, Agron. J. 85, 706–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, L. O., Carbone, G., Doherty, R. M., Tsvetsinskaya, E. A., McCarl, B. A., Adams, R. M., and McDaniel, L.: 2003a, The Uncertainty Due to Spatial Scale of Climate Scenarios in Integrated Assessments: An Example from U.S. Agriculture, Integrated Assessment, accepted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, L. O., Carbone, G., Gao, W., McDaniel, L., Tsvetsinskaya, E., McCarl, B., and Adams, R.: 2000, ‘The Issue of Spatial Scale in Integrated Assessments: An Example of Agriculture in the Southeastern U.S.’, in Preprints of the 80th AMS Annual Meeting, 11th Symposium on Global Change Studies, January 9–14, 2000, Long Beach, CA, American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp. 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, L. O., Easterling, W., and Hays, C.: 2001, ‘Comparison of Agricultural Impacts of Climate Change Calculated from High and Low Resolution Climate Model Scenarios: Part I: The Uncertainty Due to Spatial Scale’, Clint. Change 51, 131–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, L. O., Giorgi, F., McDaniel, L., and Shields, C.: 2003b, ‘Climate Scenarios for the Southeastern U.S. Based on GCM and Regional Model Simulations’, Clim. Change 60, 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns L. O, Hulme, M., Carter, T. R., Leemans, R., Lal, M., and Whetton, P.: 2001, ‘Climate Scenario Development’, in Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Chapter 13, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 739–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, L. O., Mavromatis, T., Tsvetsinskaya, E., Hays, C., and Easterling, W.: 1999, ‘Comparative Response of EPIC and CERES Crop Models to High and Low Resolution Climate Change Scenarios’, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 6623–6646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinter, P. J. Jr., Kimball, B. A., Garcia, R. L., Wall, G. W., Hunsaker, D. J., and LaMorte, R. L.: 1996, ‘Free-Air CO2 Enrichment: Responses of Cotton and Wheat Crops’, in Koch, G. W. and Mooney, H. A. (eds.), Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 215–249.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plant, R. E.: 1989, ‘An Integrated Decision Support System for Agricultural Management’, Agric. Sys. 29, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R., Boone, M. Y. L., Reddy, V. R., Hodges, H. F., Turner, S., and McKinion, J. M.: 1995, ‘Developing and Validating a Model for a Plant Growth Regulator’, Agron. J. 87, 1100–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R. and Boone, M. Y. L.: 2001, ‘Modeling and Validating Cotton Leaf Area Development and Stem Elongation’, Acta Horticulturae 593, 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R., Doma, P. R., Mearns, L. O., Bonne, M. Y. L., Hodges, H. F., Richardson, A. G., and Kakani, V. G.: 2002, ‘Simulating the Impacts of Climate Change on Cotton Production in the Mississippi Delta’, Clim. Res. 22, 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R., Hodges, H. F., and Kimball, B. A.: 2000, ‘Crop Ecosystem Responses to Global Climate Change: Cotton’, in Reddy, K. R. and Hodges, H. F. (eds.), Climate Change and Global Crop Productivity, Chapter 8, CAB International, U.K., pp. 161–187.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R., Hodges, H. F., and McKinion, J. M.: 1997a, ‘Crop Modeling and Applications: A Cotton Example’, in Sparks, D. L. (ed.), Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 59, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 225–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R., Hodges, H. F., and McKinion, J. M.: 1997b, ‘Modeling Temperature Effects on Cotton Internode and Leaf Growth’, Crop Science 37, 503–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. R., Hodges, H. F., and McKinion, J. M.: 1997c, ‘A Comparison of Scenarios for the Effect of Global Climate Change on Cotton Growth and Yield’, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24, 707–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, V. R., Baker, D. N., and Jenkins, J. N.: 1985, ‘Validation of GOSSYM: Part II — Mississippi Conditions’, Agric. Sys. 17, 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J. M. and U.S. National Assessment Agriculture Sector Team: 2001, Agriculture: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change for the United States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 136 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staggenborg, S. A., Lascano, R. J., and Krieg, D. R.: 1996, ‘Determining Cotton Water Use in a Semiarid Climate with the GOSSYM Cotton Simulation Model’, Agron. J. 88, 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsvetsinskaya, E., Mearns, L. O., Mavromatis, T., Gao, W., McDaniel, L., and Downton, M.: 2003, ‘The Effect of Spatial Scale of Climatic Change Scenarios on the Simulated Maize, Winter Wheat and Rice Production in the Southeastern United States’, Clim. Change 60, 37–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, G. W., Amthor, J. S., and Kimball, B. A.: 1994, ‘COTCO2: A Cotton Growth Simulation Model for Global Change’, Agric. For. Meteorol. 70, 289–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watterson, I. G., O’Farrell, S. P., and Dix, M. R.: 1997, ‘Energy and Water Transport in Climates Simulated by a General Circulation Model that Includes Dynamical Sea-Ice’, J. Geophy. Res. 102, 11027–11037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, W. and Heilman, J. L.: 1997, ‘Sensitivity of Evapotranspiration of Cotton and Sorghum in West Texas to Changes in Climate and CO2’, Theor. Appl. Climatol. 57, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doherty, R.M., Mearns, L.O., Reddy, K.R., Downton, M.W., McDaniel, L. (2003). Spatial Scale Effects of Climate Scenarios on Simulated Cotton Production in the Southeastern U.S.A.. In: Mearns, L.O. (eds) Issues in the Impacts of Climate Variability and Change on Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1984-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1984-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6420-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1984-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics