Abstract
Viewing the world as fundamentally continuous contrasts sharply with viewing it as fundamentally discontinuous. A smooth world represents the Newtonian-Laplacian dream of a gradual and steady upward movement of reality through a gentle Darwinian, evolutionary process. In economics this view was epitomized by Alfred Marshall. The discontinuous world defines itself in sharp contrasts and sudden changes as in the modern, punctuated evolutionary theory of Niles Eldredge and Steven Jay Gould (1972). In economics this view was most eloquently asserted by Karl Marx and Joseph Schumpeter.
Well it’s a matter of continuity. Most people’s lives have ups and downs that are gradual, a sinuous curve with first derivatives at every point. They’re the ones who never get struck by lightning. No real idea of cataclysm at all. But the ones who do get hit experience a singular point, a discontinuity in the curve of life---do you know what the time rate of change is at a cusp? Infinity that’s what! A-and right across the point, it’s minus infinity! How’s that for sudden change, eh?”
Thomas Pynchon, 1973
Gravity’s Rainbow, p. 664.
“In fact, all our theories of science are formulated on the assumption that space-time is smooth and nearly flat, so they break down at the big bang singularity, where the curvature of space-time is infinite.”
Stephen W. Hawking, 1988
A Brief History of Time, p. 46.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
There is a certain irony in this insofar as the original linear neoclassical view was heavily derived from earlier Newtonian views in physics. Mirowski (1987, 1989) has critiqued this influence as it developed in the late nineteenth century, accusing economists with some reason of “physics envy,” although some have charged him with misrepresenting and exaggerating what actually happened (Hoover, 1991 ).
Rosser (1999c) provides a more detailed discussion of the relationship between nonlinear dynamics and dialectical theory. Although they do not deal with nonlinear complex dynamics, the papers in Freeman and Carchedi (1996) provide a view of Marxian theory that derives from non-equilibrium dynamics.
Arthur, Durlauf, and Lane (1997a) discuss general approaches to complexity theory in economics. Rosser (1999b) puts this into a broader perspective of the history of thought.
If string theory is true then reality may be fundamentally continuous (von Baeyer, 1999).
Rosser (1986) discusses more generally the relationship between static and dynamic discontinuities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosser, J.B. (2000). Discontinuity in Economic Theory and Economic Discontinuities. In: From Catastrophe to Chaos: A General Theory of Economic Discontinuities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1613-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1613-0_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-1615-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1613-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive