Skip to main content

Analysis of Choice Expectations in Incomplete Scenarios

  • Chapter
Elicitation of Preferences

Abstract

This paper studies the use of probabilistic expectations data to predict behavior in incomplete scenarios posed by the researcher. The information that respondents have when replying to questions posing incomplete scenarios is a subset of the information that they would have in actual choice settings. Hence such questions do not elicit pure statements of preference; they elicit preferences mixed with expectations of future events that may affect choice behavior. The analysis developed here assumes respondents recognize that their behavior may depend on information they do not have when expectations are elicited, and that they answer coherently and honestly given the information provided. The objective in imagining such ideal respondents is to place a logical upper bound on the predictive content of elicited choice expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afriat, Sidney. (1967). “The Construction of a Utility Function from Expenditure Data,” International Economic Review 8, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, S., Scott Cardell, and Jerry Hausman. (1981). “Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars,” Journal of Econometrics 16, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, Moshe and Thawat Morikawa (1990). “Estimation of Switching Models from Revealed Preferences and Stated Intentions,” Transportation Research A 24A, 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, Lawrence, A. Brandenburger, and Edward Dekel. (1991). “Lexicographic Probabilities and Choice Under Uncertainty,” Econometrica 59, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, Jeff and Charles Manski. (1997a). “Perceptions of Economic Insecurity: Evidence from the Survey of Economic Expectations,” Public Opinion Quarterly 61, 261–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, Jeff and Charles Manski. (1997b). “Using Expectations Data to Study Subjective Income Expectations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, 855–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, Jeff and Charles Manski. (1999). “The Several Cultures of Research on Subjective Expectations.” In Robert Willis and James Smith (eds.), Wealth, Work, and Health Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Gregory and Daniel Nagin (1981). “Random versus Fixed Coefficient Quantal Choice Models.” In Charles Manski and Daniel McFadden (eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch, Ned Welch, and Shane Frederick. (1999). “Construal Processes in Preference Assessment,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Michael and Kathleen McGarry. (1995). “Evaluation of Subjective Probabilities of Mortality in the HRS,” Journal of Human Resources 30, S268 — S292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. Thomas. (1966). “Consumer Buying Intentions and Purchase Probability: An Experiment in Survey Design,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 61, 658–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, Jordan and G. Woodworth. (1983). “Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data,” Journal of Marketing Research 20, 350–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. Duncan. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. Duncan and Patrick Suppes. (1965). “Preference, Utility, and Subjective Probability.” In R. Duncan Luce, R. Bush, and E. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 3. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1975). “Maximum Score Estimation of the Stochastic Utility Model of Choice,” Journal of Econometrics 3, 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1985). “Semiparametric Analysis of Discrete Response: Asymptotic Properties of the Maximum Score Estimator,” Journal of Econometrics 27, 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1988). “Identification of Binary Response Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 729–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1990). “The Use of Intentions Data to Predict Behavior: A Best Case Analysis,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 934–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1995). Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles. (1997). “Monotone Treatment Response,” Econometrica, 65, 1311–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles and Ilan Salomon. (1987). “The Demand for Teleshopping,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 17, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, Daniel. (1973). “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Paul Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers of Econometrics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, Daniel. (1976). “Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey,” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5, 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadrel, M., Baruch Fischhoff, and W. Davis. (1993). “Adolescent (In)vulnerability,” American Psychologist 48, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos. (1972). “Choice-by-Elimination,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 9, 341–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, Hal. (1982). “The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis,” Econometrica 50, 945–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotz, V. Joseph, Jacob A. Klerman, and Robert J. Willis. (1997). “The Economics of Fertility in Developed Countries.” In Mark R. Rosenzweig and Oded Stark, (eds.), Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Vol. 1A. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, Mark R. and Kenneth I. Wolpin. (1993). “Maternal Expectations and Ex Post Rationalizations: The Usefulness of Survey Data on the Wantedness of Children,” Journal of Human Resources 28, 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderklaauw, Wilbert. (1997). “On the Use of Expectations Data in Estimating Structural Dynamic Models: An Analysis of Career Choices,” Mimeo, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpin, Kenneth I. and Gonul, Fusun. (1985). “On the Use of Expectations Data in Micro Surveys,” Mimeo, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manski, C.F., Wolpin, K.I., Weber, E.U. (1999). Analysis of Choice Expectations in Incomplete Scenarios. In: Fischhoff, B., Manski, C.F. (eds) Elicitation of Preferences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5776-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1406-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics