Skip to main content

Group Fabrication to Self-Designing Work Teams

The Development of Work Teams in Germany

  • Chapter
Work Teams: Past, Present and Future

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 6))

Abstract

The discussion of work teams in Germany as an alternative to the tayloristic division of labor and functional specialization can be traced back to the beginnings of the 20th century. At a Daimler factory group fabrication was introduced, integrating different parts, machines, and professionals in a group. They completely finished a product such as a water pump or a gearing although work specialization even increased. However it took more than sixty years that group technology and manufacturing cells found broader interest in industry. The main reasons for this renewed interest were changing market characteristics demanding a higher amount of flexibility, quality and productivity than the traditional tayloristic work structures could achieve. In particular the upcoming discussion of lean production at the beginning of the 90’s furthered the spread of work teams in German industrial and service companies significantly. In contrast the discussion of quality of work life and industrial democracy in the 70’s remained restricted to the scientific community and a few government sponsored pilot projects. In the 90’s work teams were primarily perceived as a means to increase productivity and flexibility. Nevertheless many companies integrated ideas from the discussion about quality of work life from the early 70’s, such as self regulation, job enrichment, and election of the team speaker. However the current focus on short term share holder value will put even more pressure on work teams to increase productivity. This might endanger group self-regulation and continuous improvement and strengthen traditional cost cutting strategies such as overhead reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antoni, C. H. (1986). Qualitätszirkel und Lernstatt — Ein Vergleich soziotechnischer Systeme japanischer und deutscher Herkunft. In W. Bungard & G. Wiendieck (Ed.), Qualitätszirkel als Instrument zeitgemäßer Betriebsführung (pp. 163–184). Landsberg/Lech: Verlag Moderne Industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoni, C. H. (1990). Qualitätszirkel als Modell partizipativer Gruppenarbeit. Analyse der Möglichkeiten und Grenzen aus der Sicht betroffener Mitarbeiter. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoni, C. H. (Ed.) (1994). Gruppenarbeit in Unternehmen — Konzepte, Erfahrungen, Perspektiven. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoni, C. H. (1995). Gruppenarbeit in Deutschland — eine Bestandsaufnahme. In K. J. Zink (Ed.), Erfolgreiche Konzepte der Gruppenarbeit (pp. 23–37). Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoni, C. H. (1996). Teilautonome Arbeitsgruppen. Ein Königsweg zu mehr Produktivität und einer menschengerechten Arbeit. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoni, C. H. & Eyer, E. (1997). Kunden- und prozeßorientierte Arbeitsorganisation bei der YMOS AG. C. H Antoni, E. Eyer & J. Kutscher (Eds.), (1998), Das flexible Unternehmen: Arbeitszeit, Gruppenarbeit, Entgeltsysteme, (chapter 08.01., pp. 1–28). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, C. (1991). Von Ford zu Volvo. Automobilherstellung in Schweden. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, C. (1992). Alternatives to lean production. Work organization in the swedish auto industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkelmann, P., Braczyk, H. & Seltz, R. (Eds.) (1993). Entwicklung der Gruppenarbeit in Deutschland. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMFT (Bundesminister fiir Forschung und Technologie). (1980). Gruppenarbeit in der Motorenmontage. Ein Vergleich von Arbeitsstrukturen. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brödner, P. (1985). Alternative Entwicklungspfade in die Fabrik der Zukunft. Berlin: Edition sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büth, P.(1994). Erfahrungen mit der Einführung von Produktinseln in der BOGE GmbH. In C. H. Antoni (Ed.) (1994a). Gruppenarbeit in Unternehmen — Konzepte, Erfahrungen, Perspektiven (pp. 191–208). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bungard, W. & Wiendieck, G. (Eds.), Qualitätszirkel als Instrument zeitgemäßer Betriebsführung (pp. 163–184). Landsberg/Lech: Verlag Moderne Industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. L., Charney, S., & Chiu, J. S. L. (1986). Quality circles. A guide to participation and productivity. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T. G. & Blumberg, M. (1987). Advanced Manufactoring Technology and Work Design. In T. D. Wall, C. W. Clegg & N. J. Kemp (Eds.), The Human Side of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (pp. 37–60). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. E. & Cherns, A. B. (Eds). (1975). The quality of working life. Vol. I & II. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. & Thorsrud, E. (1982). Industrielle Demokratie — Bericht über das norwegische Programm der industriellen Demokratie. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler, E., Kolb, M. & Ling, B. (1977). Humanisierung der Arbeitswelt und Produktivität. Ludwigshafen: Kiehl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerst, D., Hardwig, T., Kuhlmann, M. & Schumann, M. (1994). Gruppenarbeit in der betrieblichen Erprobung — Ein Modell kristallisiert sich heraus. Angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft, Nr.142, pp. 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1987). The Design of Work Teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüser, M. & Kaun, R. (1995). Wer wa(a)gt, gewinnt Wägetechnik nach Kundenwusch von der MettlerToled GmbH. In H.-J. Warnecke (Ed.), Aufbruch zum fraktalen Unternehmen (pp. 315–337). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen. The key to Japan’s competitive success. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens, U., Malsch, T. & Dohse, K. (1989). Moderne Zeiten in der Automobilfabrik. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kashima, Y. & Callan, V. J. (1994). The japanese work group. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 609–645). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaune, A. (1996). Gruppenarbeit in der Automobilproduktion Standortbestimmung, Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten und Weiterentwicklungsansätze. Angewandte Arbeitswissenschafi, 150, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klebert, K., Schrader, E., & Straub, W. (1980). Moderationsmethode. München: Preisinger Studio und Verlag für Kommunikation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, R. & Hellpach, W. (1922). Gruppenfabrikation. Berlin: Julius Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Addison: Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichart, L. (1984). Lernstatt — die deutsche Alternative. Personal, 36, 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohmert, W. & Weg, F. J. (1976). Organisation teilautonomer Gruppenarbeit: Betriebliche Projekte — Leitregeln zur Gestaltung, Bd.1. In RKW (Ed.), Beiträge zur Arbeitswissenschaft, Reihe 1, Bd. 1 (pp. 12–13). München, Wien: Carl Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulich, E. (1989). VW-Projekt: Gruppenarbeit in der Motorenmontage. In S. Greif, H. Holling & N. Nicholson (Eds.), Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie: Internationales Handbuch in Schlüsselbegriffen (pp. 527–533). München: Psychologie Verlags Union. (Neuauflage 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. & Roos, D. (1991). Die zweite Revolution in der Automobilindustrie. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink, K. J. (Ed.) (1994). Qualität als Managementaufgabe. Landsberg: Verlag Moderne Industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink, K. J. (Ed.) (1995). Erfolgreiche Konzepte zur Gruppenarbeit. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Antoni, C. (2000). Group Fabrication to Self-Designing Work Teams. In: Beyerlein, M.M. (eds) Work Teams: Past, Present and Future. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9492-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9492-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5609-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9492-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics