Skip to main content

Integrating two theoretical perspectives on organisational adaptation

  • Chapter
From the Eye of the Storm

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to outline the theoretical framework applied in an international comparative research project on the relationship between governmental policies and organisational adaptation in higher education (referred to as HEINE-project), and to position the overall research question of the project in a more general theoretical landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baier, V.E., March J.G. and Sætren H. (1988). ‘Implementation and ambiguity’, in March, J.G. (ed.), Decisions and Organization. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 101–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. and Fudge, C. (eds.), (1981). Policy and Action. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., Marton, S. and Hanney, S. (1995). Policy Arenas, Network and Higher Education Reforms. The Cases of England, Sweden and Norway Bergen: LOS-Senter, Notat 95/40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. and Olsen, J.P. (1990). Kan organisasjonsformer velges? Bergen: LOS-Senter, Notat 90/6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerych, L. and Sabatier, P. (eds.) (1986). Great Expectations and Mixed Performance. Stoke: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. (1987). ‘How to Succeed in Reorganizing: The Case of the Norwegian Health Administration’, Scandinavian Political Studies 10 (1), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System. Berkeley: University of California Press. Cohen, M.D. and March, J.G. (1974). Leadership and Ambiguity, 2“ d Ed. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, D. (1984). The New Politics of Science. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review 48, 147160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F.R., Sutton, J.R., Meyer, J.W. and Scott, R.W. (1993). ‘Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labour Markets’, American Journal of Sociology 99, 396–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L.B. (1992). ‘Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structure: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law’, American Journal of Sociology 97, 1531–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (1984). Organisasjonsutforming. Oslo: Tano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (1987). ‘Designing Public Organizations’, in Kooiman, J. and Eliassen, K.A. (eds), Managing Public Organizations. Lessons from Contemporary European Experience. London: Sage, pp. 142–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, A. and Jamison, A. (1994). ‘Changing Policy Agendas in Science and Technology’, in

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (ed.), Handbook of Science and Technology Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D.W. and Gray, B. (1994). ‘Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues’, Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3), 467–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1993). ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25, 275–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. Foss (1990). ‘Implementation of Modernization: Paradoxes in the Public Control of Higher Educational Institutions-The Case of Denmark’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 13 (1), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEINE (1998). ‘Theoretical framework’, Gornitzka, A. and Maassen, P.A.M., Interim report to the European Commission DG XII, Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogerwerf, A. (1990). ‘Reconstructing Policy Theory’, Evaluation and Program Planning 13, 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C.C. (1983). The Tools of Government. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg, F. (1977). ‘Politics of redistribution and equalization’, Politico 28, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, K. (1992). Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J.E. (1993). The Public Sector. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, I.M. and Gornitzka, A. (1995). ‘New Management Systems in Norwegian Universities: the interface between reform and institutional understanding’, European Journal of Education 30 (3), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (1980). Why Innovation Fails. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S.H. and Peters, B.G. (1990) ‘Policy Formulation and the Challenge of Conscious Design’, Evaluation and Program Planning 13, 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P.A.M. (1996). Governmental Steering and the Academic Culture. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. and Wildaysky, A. (1978). ‘Implementation as Evolution’, in Freeman, H. (ed.), Policy Studies Review Annual. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1988). ‘Footnotes to Organizational Change’, in March, J.G. (ed.), Decisions and Organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1995). Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. New York: The Free Press. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984). ‘The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review 78, 734–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1983). ‘Organizing Political Life. What Reorganization Tells Us About Government’, American Political Science Review 77, 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathisen, W.C. (1997). Diskursanalyse for statsvitere: Hva, hvorfor og hvordan Oslo: Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Working Paper 01/97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, D.A. and Sabatier, P.A. (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Glenview, IL.: Scott, Foresman and Co.Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977). ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). ‘Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes’, Academy of Management Review 16 (1), 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1997). ‘Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource-based views’, Strategic Management Journal 18 (9), 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J.P. (1989). Modernization Programs in Perspective - Institutional Analysis of Organizational Change Bergen: LOS-Senter, Notat 89/46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J.P. (1983). Organized Democracy. Stavanger: Norwegian University Press. Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and Organization Theory. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations; A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J.L. and Wildaysky, A.B. (1971). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, A. (1968). Political Science and Public Policy Markham Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1987). ‘The Adolescence of Institutional Theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly 32, 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P.S. and Zucker, L. (1983). ‘Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935’, Administrative Science Quarterly 30, 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vught, F.A. van (ed.) (1989). Governmental Strategies and Innovation in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maassen, P., Gornitzka, Å. (1999). Integrating two theoretical perspectives on organisational adaptation. In: Jongbloed, B., Maassen, P., Neave, G. (eds) From the Eye of the Storm. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9263-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9263-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5355-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9263-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics