Skip to main content

Abstract

Commenting upon Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit involves a process of reappraisal. Hegel in the Phenomenology of Spirit appraises the claims of consciousness, and these claims are judged ultimately in the light of the achievement of a self-sustaining mode of consciousness. A review of Hegel’s phenomenological understanding of consciousness if it is not to be conducted according to external criteria, is bound to track and evaluate Hegel’s appraisal of consciousness and, in doing so, will be undertaking a reappraisal of Hegel’s assessment of consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Pippin, “You Can’t Get There From Here: Transition Problems in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, F. Beiser ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.W.F. Hegel, Phenomeenologie des Geistes,Werke 3, (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1970). For a lively English translation, see G.W.F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Mind, translated by Sir James Baillie, (London and New York: George, Allen and Unwin, 1971), p.247. For concise, perceptive commentary on Hegel’s conception of infinity see T. Pinkard, Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 360.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harris takes Plato to be the inspiration for this correspondence theory of truth. For distinct treatments of the relationships between Hegel and Plato’s metaphysics and epistemologies, see the following. M. Rosen, Hegel’s Dialectic and its Criticism, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982). G.K.Browning, “Transitions to and from Nature in Hegel and Plato,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, no.26, Autumn/Winter, 1992. J.N. Findlay, “Hegelianism and Platonism,” in J.J. O’Malley, K.W. Algozin and F.G. Weiss (eds), Hegel and the History of Philosophy, (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bubner distinguishes his interpretation of this relation between philosophy and history in Hegel from that of Heidegger. See R. Bubner, Dialektik und Wissenschaft, (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kenneth Westphal suggests a similarly nuanced reading of the relationship between the community and the individual in Hegel’s social ethics in his article, “The Basic Context and Structure of Hegel” Philosophy of Right in F.C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1993), p. 236–237. See also, H. Brod, Hegel’s Philosophy of Politics — Idealism, Politics and Identity, (San Francisco and Oxford: Westview Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a concise alternative treatment of Hegel’s organicism, see Ibid., pp. 236, and G.K. Browning, “Plato and Hegel: Reason, Redemption and Political Theory,” in History of Political Thought, Vol. VIII (3), 1987, pp. 377–393.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.W.F. Hegel, Introduction to the Lectures on the History of Philosophy, translated by T.M. Knox and A.V. Miller, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985), 1892, Vol.1. p.6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See H. Marcuse, Reason and Revolution, (London, Routledge Kegan and Paul: 1941) and M. Oakeshott, On Human Conduct, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975). For a discussion of Rorty and Macintyre and the relationship between Hegel’s approach and recent “historicist” tendencies in philosophy, see the article, Robert Stern, “Hegel and the New Historicism,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, nos. 21/22, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For a revisionist treatment of the British Idealists, which sees them as developing something like contemporary, non-metaphysical views of Hegel see, Robert Stern, “British Hegelianism: A Non-Metaphysical View,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, No. 31, Spring/Summer 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.L. Reinhold, Elemente der Phänomenologie oder Erlauterung des rationalen Realismus durch seine Anwendung auf die Erscheinungen in Beytrage zur leichtem Ubersicht des Zustands der Philosophie beym Anfang (d. 19. Jh., Heft 4: 1802).

    Google Scholar 

  11. This is a decidedly revisionist account of Hegel’s ethics and of his treatment of Kantian ethics. For a more traditional account in which Hegel is seen as dissolving ethics into sociology see W.H. Walsh, Hegelian Ethics, (London and New York: Macmillan, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. For an account of Hegel’s appreciation of Plato’s dialectic see chapter 1 in G.K. Browning, Plato and Hegel: Two Modes of Philosophising about Politics (New York: Garland Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A treatment of the Phenomenology of Spirit which sees it as primarily a vehicle for aiding non-philosophical forms of consciousness can be found in I. Soll, An Introduction to Hegel’s Metaphysics, (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. An example of such a tendentious reading of Hegel is A. Kojeve, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, trans. J.H. Nichols, (New York: Basic Books, 1960). A classic statement of the constant but necessary revision of the past in the light of changing cultures and values is to be found in R.G. Collingwood, “Epilegomena,” The Idea of History, edited with an Introduction by Jan Van Der Dussen, (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A non-metaphysical account of Hegel’s political theory is given in Z.A. Pelczynski, “Introduction,” Hegel’s Political Writings,(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964). See also the discussion in the opening chapter of M. Tunick, Hegel’s Political Philosophy — Interpreting the Practice of Legal Punishment, (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Browning, G.K. (1997). Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: A Reappraisal. In: Browning, G.K. (eds) Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: A Reappraisal. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées, vol 149. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8917-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8917-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4821-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8917-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics