Skip to main content

Frege’s Letters

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 251))

Abstract

Gottlob Frege’s isolation is almost legendary. Michael Dummett portrays him as having been a man who was perhaps too original to have ever been capable of working with others, “of sailing on any sea on which other ships were in sight1....”, and someone who “never seems to have learned from anybody, not even by reaction....”1 Dummett’s Frege felt isolated, misunderstood and unlistened to in the philosophical and mathematical world of his time, led a “life of disillusionment and frustration”.2 In addition to this, we have Bertrand Russell’s well-known claims that Frege’s work had gone virtually unnoticed until Russell discovered it in 1900.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Dummett, Michael: 1981a, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Duckworth, London, p. 661.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dummett: 198la, p. xxxi.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, Bertrand: 1946, A History of Western Philosophy,Allen and Unwin, London, p. 858, for example.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sluga, Hans: 1980, Gottlob Frege,Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 41–42; Dummett 1981a, p. xxxi.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frege, Gottlob: 1979, Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Blackwell, Oxford, p. 52, cited as PMC within the text. I cite as BW the German edition Frege: 1976, Nachgelassene Schriften und Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel, vol. 2, Meiner, Hamburg; and as PW Frege: 1979, Posthumous Writings, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kreiser, Lothar: 1973, `Review of Nachgelassene Schriften’, Deutsche Zeitschrift fir Philosophie 21, 523.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sluga: 1980, pp. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dummett 1981a, p. 661.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cantor, Georg: 1885, `Review of Frege’s Foundations’, Deutsche Literaturzeitung VI(20), 728–729 and Frege’s 1885 reply in the same journal, VI(28), 1030.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mohanty, J. N.: 1982, Husserl and Frege, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Russell, Bertrand: 1919, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Allen and Unwin, London, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reading the notes in the English and German editions of the correspondence one finds information about Frege’s drafts of letters to Russell, Wittgenstein, Jourdain, Hilbert, Peano, Pasch, Huntington, Zsigmondy, Linke, Jones, and Speiser, among others.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The relevant notes in the English and German editions show that letters from Frege to Marty, Husserl, Jourdain and Hilbert were found in various archives; letters to Liebmann and Peano had been published; Dingler’s wife had copies of her husband’s correspondence; Russell had photographic copies of Frege’s letters to him.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a more complete account of the fate of the letters see: Veraart, Albert: 1976, `Geschichte des wissenschaftlichen Nachlasses Gottlob Freges und seiner Edition. Mit einem Katalog des ursprünglichen Bestands der nachgelassenen Schriften Freges’, in M. Schirn (ed.), Studien zu Frege, vol. 1, Fromann-Holzboog, Stuttgart, Bad Canstatt, pp. 49–106; Scholz, Heinrich: 1936, `Der wissenschaftliche Nachlass von Gottlob Frege’, in Actes du congrès international de philosophie scientifique, vol. VIII: Histoire de la logique et de la philosophie scientifique, Hermann, Paris, pp. 24–30; Kreiser, Lothar: 1974, `Zur Geschichte des wissenschaftlichen Nachlasses Gottlob Freges’, Ruch Filozoficznej 33(1), 42–47, and Kreiser, 1973. I am obliged to give approximate figures since so many letters fall into more than one category. For example, many letters that were lost were recovered, or partially recovered through photocopies, drafts, typescripts, some of the letters Scholz inventoried were only known through other letters, letters Frege wrote to Wittgenstein were only very recently discovered, etc.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dummett, Michael: 1981b, The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 7–27; Dummett, 1981a, pp. 629–664.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dummett: 1981a, pp. 685–686; PMC, p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scholz’s successors were able to locate letters Frege had written to Edmund Husserl, Anton Marty, David Hilbert, and Heinrich Liebmann.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dummett: 1981b, pp. 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dummett: 1981a, p. 658.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dummett: 1981a, p. 686.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dummett: 1981a, 657–658; Dummett: 1981b, pp. 9–10, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dummett: 1981a, pp. 664, 686; Dummett: 1981b, pp. 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Compare the list in Frege, Gottlob: 1989, `Briefe an Ludwig Wittgenstein’, Grazer philosophische Studien, 33/34, 8 with the list on BW, pp. 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frege, Gottlob: 1980, `Appendix to Basic Laws of Arithmetic II’, in Peter Geach and Max Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 214–224.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Frege, Gottlob: 1986, Foundations of Arithmetic,Blackwell, Oxford; Burge, Tyler: 1984, `Frege on Extensions of Concepts from 1884 to 1903’, The Philosophical Review XCIII(1) (January), 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frege: 1986, §105.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Frege, Gottlob: 1964, Basic Laws of Arithmetic, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frege: 1980, p. 214; PW, pp. 181–82.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Frege: 1980, p. 214; Sluga, pp. 162–175.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grattan-Guinness, Ivor: 1971, `The Correspondence Between Georg Cantor and Philip Jourdain’, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 73, 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Grattan-Guinness, Ivor: 1977, Dear Russell-Dear Jourdain: A Commentary on Russell’s Logic Based on his Correspondence with P. Jourdain, Duckworth, London, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Russell, Bertrand: 1903, Principles of Mathematics,Norton, New York, §100; PMC, pp. 133–134.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kreiser: 1973, p. 522.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Husserl, Edmund: 1970, Husserliana, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 447–452.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reid, Constance: 1976, Courant in Göttingen and New York, Springer, New York, pp. 21, 33–34, 41, 47, 90; Schuhmann, Karl: 1977, Husserl-Chronik, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schuhmann: 1977, pp. 19, 22; Husserl, Edmund: 1975, Introduction to the Logical Investigations: A Draft of a Preface (1913),Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, p. 37; Schmit, Roger: 1981, Husserls Philosophie der Mathematik,Bouvier, Bonn, pp. 40–48, 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Husserl, Edmund: 1891, Philosophie der Arithmetik, Pfeffer, Halle, pp. 104–105, 116–120, 132–135, 156, 164–165, 168; Hill, Claire: 1991, Word and Object in Husserl, Frege and Russell, Ohio University Press, Athens, ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rang, B: 1981 `Zermelo’s Discovery of the Russell Paradox’, Historia Mathematica 8 (February), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosado-Haddock, Guillermo: 1973, Edmund Husserls Philosophie der Logik und Mathematik im Lichte der Gegenwärtige Logik und Grundlagenforschung, Dissertation Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, pp. 145–150; Schmit: 1981, pp. 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dummett: 1981b, pp. 21–22; Sluga: 1980, pp. 168–176.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sluga: 1980, pp. 170–171; Scholz: 1936, pp. 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dummett: 1981b, pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Veraart: 1976, pp. 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Veraart: 1976, pp. 97, 98; Scholz: 1936, pp. 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Veraart: 1976, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Veraart: 1976, pp. 91, 94; Burge: 1984 discusses this thoroughly.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Veraart: 1976, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Burge: 1984, pp. 13–14; Sluga: 1980, p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Scholz: 1936, p. 29; Veraart: 1976, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kreiser: 1973: p. 522.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Frege: 1989, pp. 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Veraart: 1976, p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dummett: 1981a, p. 661.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Russell, Bertrand: 1964, Principia Mathematica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Church, Alonzo: 1944, `Review of M. Farber, The Foundations of Phenomenology’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 9, 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hill, C.O. (1995). Frege’s Letters. In: Hintikka, J. (eds) From Dedekind to Gödel. Synthese Library, vol 251. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8478-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8478-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4554-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8478-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics