Abstract
As a response to the serious problem of prison and jail overcrowding in the criminal justice system, this research is a study on restitution as an alternative to incarceration for property offenders. To test three hypotheses, data were collected through mailing questionnaires to 2,177 randomly selected members of the public and 253 criminal justice officials with an overall response rate of 61.7% in Hennepin County, Minnesota, U.S.A. The results show the public’s strong support for restitution as an alternative penalty to incarceration for property offenders. Considerable ignorance or misunderstanding by criminal justice officials of the public’s support for restitution as an alternative sentencing has been found. Finally, crime victims seem to be less punitive than nonvictims.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The author thanks Dr. Burt Galaway for his invaluable comments and support for this research project. This is a summary of the author’s Ph.D. dissertation research.
References
Austin, J., & Krisberg, B. (1981). Wider, stronger, and different nets: The dialectics of criminal justice reform. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18(1), 165–196.
Boers, K., & Sessar, K. (1989). Do people really want punishment?: On the relationship between acceptance of restitution, needs for punishment and fear of crime. In K. Sessar & H. Kerner (Eds.), Developments in crime and crime control research. New York: Springer.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (March, 1987). Justice expenditure and employment, 1985 (Bulletin). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (1988). Our crowed jails: A national plight. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Bureau of the Census. (1988). Estimates of households, for counties: July 1, 1985. Washington, D. C: U.S. Department of Commerce.
Coates, R. B., & Gehm, J. (1985). Victim meets offender: An evaluation of victim-offender reconciliation programs. Michigan City, Ind.: PACT Institute of Justice.
Colson, C. W., & Benson, D. H. (1980). Restitution as an alternative to imprisonment. Detroit College of Law Review, 2, 523–598.
Cory, B., & Gettinger, S. (1984). Time to build?: The realities of prison construction. Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
Dahl, R. A. (1956). A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Devlin, P. (1965). The enforcement of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dicey, A. V. (1962). Lectures on the relation between law and public opinion in England during the 19th century. London: MacMillan.
Dijk, J. J. M, & Steinmetz, C. H. D. (1988). Pragmatism, ideology and crime control: Three Dutch surveys. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing: Surveys from five countries. Aldershot: Gower.
Doble, J. (1987). Crime and punishment: The public’s view — A qualitative analysis of public opinion. New York: The Public Agenda Foundation.
Doble, J., & Klein, J. (1989). Prison overcrowding and alternative sentences: The views of the people of Alabama. New York: The Public Agenda Foundation.
Dye, T. R. (1975). Understanding public policy (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ellsworth, P. C, & Ross, L. (1983). Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists and retentionists. Crime & Delinquency, 29(1), 116–169.
Fattah, E. A. (1986). From crime policy to victim policy: Reorienting the justice system. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Fogel, D., Galaway, B., & Hudson, J. (1972). Restitution in criminal justice: A Minnesota experiment. Criminal Law Bulletin, 8(7), 681–691.
Galaway, B. (1984). Public acceptance of restitution as an alternative to imprisonment for property offenders: A survey. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Justice.
Galaway, B. (1987). Criminal justice trends. Unpublished paper prepared for the Minnesota Citizens Council on Crime and Justice, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Galaway, B. (1988). Restitution as innovation or unfilled promise. Federal Probation, 52(3), 3–14.
Gandy, J., & Galaway, B. (1980). Restitution as a sanction for offenders: A public’s view. In J. Hudson & B. Galaway (Eds.), Victims, offenders and alternative sanctions. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Gandy, J. (1978). Attitudes toward the use of restitution. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Offender restitution in theory and action. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Gettinger, S. (1984). Assessing criminal justice needs. National Institute of Justice: Research in Brief. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
Gottfredson, S. D., & McConville, S. (1987). Introduction. In S. Gottfredson & S. McConville (Eds.), America’s correctional crisis: Prison populations and public policy. New York: Greenwood Press.
Gottfredson, S. D., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). The correctional crisis: Prison populations and public policy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Gottfredson, S. D., & Taylor, R. B. (1984). Public policy and prison populations: Measuring opinions about reform. Judicature, 68 (4–5).
Gottfredson, S. D., Warner, B. D., & Taylor, R. B. (1988). Conflict and consensus about criminal justice in Maryland. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing: Surveys from five countries. Aldershot: Gower.
Grindstaff, C. F. (1974). Public attitudes and court dispositions: A comparative analysis. Sociology and Social Research, 58(4), 417–426.
Harland, A. T. (1978). Compensating the victims of crime. Criminal Law Bulletin, 203-224.
Harris, M. K. (1983-84). Strategies, values, and the emerging generation of alternatives to incarceration. Review of Law and Social Change, New York University, 12(1), 141–170.
Hickman-Maslin Research (1986). Report prepared for North Carolina Center on Crime and Punishment based on a survey of registered voters in the State of North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Center on Crime and Punishment.
Hough, M., & Mayhew, P. (1983). The British crime survey: First report. Home Office Study No.76. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Irwin, J., & Austin, J. (1987). It’s about time: Solving America’s prison crowding crisis. San Francisco: The National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
Joutsen, M. (1987). The role of the victim of crime in European criminal justice systems: A crossnational study of the role of the victim. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki Institute for Crime Prevention and Control affiliated with the United Nations.
Knowles, J. (1987). Ohio citizen attitudes concerning crime and criminal justice. Columbus, Ohio: Governor’s Office of Criminal Justice Services.
Komarnick, M., & Doble, J. (1986). Crime and corrections: A review of public opinion data since 1974. New York: The Public Agenda Foundation.
Lowery, D., Gray, V., & Hager, G. (1989). Public opinion and policy change in American States. American Politics Quarterly, 17, 3–31.
Maquire, M., & Corbett, C. (1987). The effects of crime and the work of victims support schemes. London: Gower.
Monroe, A. (1979). Consistency between public preferences and national policy decisions. American Politics Quarterly, 7, 3–19.
Opinion roundup: Crime — The public gets tough (1982). Public Opinion, 5 (5), 36.
Page, B., & Shapiro, R. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77.
Parker, H. A. (1970). Juvenile court actions and public response. In P. G. Garabedian & D. C. Gibbons (Eds.), Becoming delinquent. Chicago: Aldine.
Riley, P. J., & Rose, V. M. (1980). Public vs. elite opinion on correctional reform: Implications for social policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 345–356.
Roberts, J. (1988a). Empirical research on sentencing. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of Justice Canada.
Roberts, J. (1988b). Public opinion and sentencing: The surveys of the Canadian Sentencing Commission. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of Justice Canada.
Schmidt, B. A. (1986). Victim offender mediation: Implementing a collaborative justice model. Unpublished paper written for the Department of Administration of Justice and the Graduate School of the Wichita State University for the Degree of Master of Administration of Justice.
Shapland, J., Willmore, J., & Duff, P. (1985). Victims in the criminal justice system. London: Gower.
Shaw, S. (1982). The people’ justice: A major poll of public attitudes on crime and punishment. London: Prison Reform Trust.
Shireman, C. H., & Reamer, F. G. (1986). Rehabilitating juvenile justice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Taylor, D. G., Schepple, K. L., & Stinchcombe, A. L. (1979). Salience of crime and support for harsher criminal sanctions. Social Problems, 26(4), 413–424.
Thomson, D. R., & Ragona, A. J. (1987). Popular moderation versus governmental authoritarianism: An interactionist view of public sentiments toward criminal sanctions. Crime & Delinquency, 33(2), 337–357.
Van Ness, D. W. (1986). Crime and its victims. Downers Grove, III.: Intervarsity Press.
Van Ness, D. W., Carlson, D. R., Crawford, T., & Strong, K. (1989). Restorative justice: Theory. Washington, D.C.: Justice Fellowship.
Wilkins, L. T. (1984). Consumerist criminology. London: Heinemann.
Wright, M. (1989). What the public wants. In M. Wright & B. Galaway (Eds.), Mediation and criminal justice: Victims, offenders and community. London: Sage.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bae, I. (1992). A Survey on Public Acceptance of Restitution as an Alternative to Incarceration for Property Offenders in Hennepin County, Minnesota, U.S.A.. In: Messmer, H., Otto, HU. (eds) Restorative Justice on Trial. Nato Science Series D: (closed), vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8064-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8064-9_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4128-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8064-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive