Skip to main content

Political Science and Education: The Long View and The Short

  • Chapter
Theory and Politics / Theorie und Politik

Abstract

No political scientist can escape a fascination with education; and, for once, the current interest in research on education and the political order is not another fad or fashion in our discipline. To believe otherwise would be taking the short view indeed. If one were only to take the short view, one would deprive oneself of the sustained efforts made through the centuries by political philosophers to understand the relationship between politics and education. Not surprisingly, Carl Friedrich, wide-ranging political theorist that he is, does not make this mistake. And, interestingly, it is “Tradition and the Role of Education” that fascinates him.1 It is an honorable and honored perspective. In taking it, Friedrich confirms his sensitivity to the relevant in politics. I cannot do other but express my appreciation.

An earlier version of this paper was prepared for the research workshop on “The Politics of Elementary and Secondary Education,” sponsored by the Committee on Basic Research in Education, Division of Behavioral Sciences, National Academy of Science/ National Research Council, held September 14–19, 1970, at Stanford University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Carl J. Friedrich, Man and His Government: An Empirical Theory of Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963, Chapter 33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1963, p. 379. I could cite here just as well the late

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. O. Key’s chapter on “The Educational System” in Public Opinion and American Democracy, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1961, pp. 315–343. Key orders his variables in the same way as Almond and Verba do. But I think both his premises and inferences are different — in fact inconsistent with his data presentation. Almond and Verba, on the other hand, are highly consistent and interpret their findings within the contours of the underlying model.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 502.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 503.

    Google Scholar 

  6. It is amusing, and I think ironic, that the author of a recent text in political theory entitles one of his chapters “The Aristotelian Bridge: Aristotle, Lipset, Almond.” See William T. Bluhm, Theories of the Political System, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert E. Ward, “Japan: The Continuity of Modernization,” in Lucian W. Pye and Sidney Verba, eds., Political Culture and Political Development, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1965, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lucian W. Pye, Politics, Personality, and Nation Building: Burma’s Search for Identity, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962, p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert T. Holt and John E. Turner, The Political Basis of Economic Development, Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1966, p. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  10. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, edited by R. B. McCallum, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1947, P. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ernest Barker, Principles of Social and Political Theory, Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1951, p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charles E. Merriam, The Making of Citizens: A Comparative Study of Methods of Civic Training, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1931, p. x.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., pp. x-xi.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Charles E. Merriam, Systematic Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1945, pp. 100–101.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholas A. Masters, Robert H. Salisbury, and Thomas H. Eliot, State Politics and the Public Schools: An Exploratory Analysis, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harmon Zeigler, The Political Life of American Teachers, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edgar Litt, The Public Vocational University: Captive Knowledge and Public Power, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Which explains, perhaps, why I find much of virtue in Emile Durlcheim’s Moral Education, edited by Everett K. Wilson, New York: The Free Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Klaus von Beyme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eulau, H. (1971). Political Science and Education: The Long View and The Short. In: von Beyme, K. (eds) Theory and Politics / Theorie und Politik. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1063-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1063-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0429-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-1063-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics