Skip to main content

A-Design: Theory and Implementation of an Adaptive, Agent-Based Method of Conceptual Design

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98

Abstract

A new theory of engineering design known as A-Design is introduced that models the workings of realistic engineering design in a complex adaptive system of interacting software agents. The methodology is general enough to be used on a variety of search problems, however the motivation behind the research is to create design configurations. The system constructs meaningful designs from a catalog of electromechanical components based on a variety of user-defined objectives while accom—modating changes that might occur in the focus of the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balachandran, M. and Gero, J. S.: 1984, A comparison of three methods for generating the pareto optimal set, Engineering Optimization, 7, 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, B., Goel, A. K. and Iwasaki, Y.: 1993, Functional representation as design rationale, Computer, 26, 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eschenauer, H., Koski, J. and Osyczka, A. (eds): 1990, Multicriteria Design Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, C. M. and Fleming, P. J.: 1995, An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization, Evolutionary Computation, 3, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbus, K. D.: 1988, Qualitative physics: Past, present and future, inH. Shrobe (ed.), Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 239–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, B. L.: 1992, Uniting probabilistic methods for optimization, in J. J. Swain, D. Goldsman, R. C. Crain and J. R. Wilson (eds), Proceedings of the 1992 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 500–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. S.: 1990, Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design, Al Magazine, 11(4), 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, F.: 1989, Tabu search-Part 1, ORSA Journal on Computing, 1(2), 190–206.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. E.: 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H.: 1992, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, 2nd edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, S. P. and Rinderle, J. R.: 1989, A synthesis strategy for mechanical devices, Research in Engineering Design, 1, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt Jr, C. D. and Vecchi, M. P.: 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 220, 671–679.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kota, S.: 1990, A qualitative matrix representation scheme for the conceptual design of mechanisms, Proceedings of the ASME Design Automation Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J. R., Bennett III, F. H. and Andre, D.: 1996, Automated design of both the topology and sizing of analog electrical circuits using genetic programming, in J. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘96, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 151–170.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, J. E., Newell, A. and Rosenbloom, P. S.: 1986, Soar: An architecture for general intelligence, Technical Report CMU-CS-86–171, Carnegie Mellon University, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. G. (ed.): 1988, Artificial Life, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, C. T., Zhou, J. L. and Tits, A. L.: 1993, CFSQP: C-implemented Functional Sequential Quadratic Programming, University of Maryland, Institute for Systems Research, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M.: 1996, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, S. S.: 1992, Synergy in Cooperating Agents: Design Manipulators from Task Specifications, Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navinchandra, D., Sycara, K. P. and Narasimhan, S.: 1991, A transformational approach to case-based synthesis, AI EDAM, 5, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. S. and Shapiro, V.: 1993, Chain models of physical behavior for engineering analysis and design, Research in Engineering Design, 5, 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, C. P., Webster, T. A. and Cutkosky, M. P.: 1995, Using Pareto optimality to coordinate distributed agents, AI EDAM, 9, 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadrel, R., Woodbury, R., Fenves, S. and Talukdar, S.: 1993, Controlling asynchronous team design environments with simulated annealing, Research in Engineering Design, 5(2), 88–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queipo, N., Devarakonda, R. and Humphrey, J. A. C.: 1994, Genetic algorithms for thermosciences research: Application to the optimized cooling of electronic components, International Journal Heat and Mass Transfer, 37, 893–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. and Norvig, P.: 1995, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, J. D.: 1985, Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms, inJ. J. Grefensette (ed.), Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, L.C., and Cagan, J.: 1995, Recursive annealing: A computational model for machine design, Research in Engineering Design, 7, 102–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar, S.: 1993, Asynchronous teams, Fourth International Symposium on Expert Systems Applications to Power Systems, La Trobe University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar, S., Baerentzen, L., Gove, A. and de Souza, P.: 1996, Asynchronous teams: Organizations for algorithmic computation, EDRC Tech–Report 18–56–96, EDRC, Carnegie Mellon University, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, D. L.: 1991, A formal method for subjective design evaluations with multiple attributes, Research in Engineering Design, 3, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K., and Seering, W.: 1989, Synthesis of schematic descriptions in mechanical design, Research in Engineering Design, 1, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, R. V., and Dixon, J.: 1994, Guiding conceptual design through behavioral reasoning, Research in Engineering Design, 6, 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, M.I., Cagan, J., Kotovsky, K. (1998). A-Design: Theory and Implementation of an Adaptive, Agent-Based Method of Conceptual Design. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6153-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5121-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics