Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASDT,volume 18))

  • 150 Accesses

Abstract

Various environments have been selected throughout the world for the potential deep disposal of long-lived radioactive waste. The selection of these environments has been carried out using a variety of methods, some of them more logical and defensible than others. The raison d’être for their selection also varies from country to country.

Important lessons have been learnt from the site selection programmes, the site characterisation activities and the accompanying performance assessments that have been carried out concerning the suitability of geological environments for the disposal of long-lived waste. These lessons are the subject of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. SKB (1992a) SKB 91 - Final disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Importance of the bedrock for safety, SKB Technical Report92–20, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  2. SKB (1992b) Treatment and final disposal of nuclear waste. The Aspo Hard Rock Laboratory, Background Report to the RhID Programme 92, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  3. SKB (1983) KBS-3, Final Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, Volumes I-IV, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nagra (1994) Kristallin-1 Safety Assessment Report, Nagra Technical ReportNTB 93–22E, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  5. TVO (1992) Final disposal of spent fuel in the Finnish bedrock, Technical plans and safety assessment. Report YJT-92–31E, Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nirex (1989) Deep Repository Project. Preliminary Environmental and Radiological Assessment and Preliminary Safety Report (PERA/PSR), U.K. Nirex ReportNo. 71. U.K. Nirex Ltd, Harwell, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nirex (1995) Post closure performance assessment. Nirex-95: A preliminary analysis of the groundwater pathway for a deep repository at Sellafield; 3 volumes, U.K. Nirex Science ReportS/95/012. U.K. Nirex Ltd, Harwell, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Billington, D.E., Lever, D.A., and Wisbey, S.J. (1989) Comparative assessment of concepts and areas for deep disposal (Phase 2): Summary, U.K. Nirex Safety Studies Series ReportNSS/A301, U.K. Nirex Ltd, Harwell, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bonne, A. (1991) Geoscientific investigations in the Belgian R&D programme concerning the disposal of radioactive waste in clay, in P.A. Witherspoon (ed.) Geological Problems in Radioactive Waste Isolation - A World-Wide Review, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-29703. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman, N.A. and Mcewen, T.J. (1991) Geological and hydrogeological aspects of the deep disposal of nuclear waste in Britain, in R A Downing and W B Wilkinson (eds.) Applied Groundwater Hydrology, Oxford Science Publications, pp 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pagis (1984) Performance Assessment of Geological Isolation Systems — Phase 1 report for the Salt Option, CEC R&D Programme on Radioactive Waste Management and Storage. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nagra (1988) Sediment study - Intermediate Report 1988: disposal options for long-lived radioactive waste in Swiss sedimentary formations, Executive Summary, Nagra Technical Report88–25E, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aecl (1994b) The disposal of Canada’s nuclear fuel waste: The geosphere model for post-closure assessment, AECL ReportAECL-10709, COG-93–9, AECL, Pinawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davison C.C. et al.(1994) The disposal of Canada’s nuclear fuel waste: The geosphere model for post-closure assessment, AECL-10709, COG-93–9, AECL, Pinawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nagra (1995) Disposal programme for HLW. Nagra Bulletin, No. 25, March 1995, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chapman, N.A., Mcewen, T.J., and Beale, H. (1986) Geological environments for deep disposal of intermediate level wastes in the U.K., in Proc. of IAEA Sympo-sium on Siting, Design and Construction of Underground Repositories for Radioactive Wastes, Hannover, March 1986. IAEA, Vienna, Austria, pp 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mcewen, T.J. (1995) Review of site selection programmes for the deep disposal of radioactive waste. QuantiSci Report to MMC (Japan), IG4432.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SKB (1995) Treatment and final disposal of nuclear waste, RD&D Programme 95, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aecl (1994a) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the concept for disposal of Canada’s nuclear fuel waste, AECL ReportAECL-10711, COG-93–1, AECL, Pinawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Atkinson, A., Williams, S.J., and Wisbey, S.J. (1992) NSARP Reference Document. The near field, U.K. Nirex Safety Studies Series ReportNSS/G117, U.K. Nirex Ltd., Harwell, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Savage, D. and Stenhouse, M.J. (1995) Geochemical data requirements for performance assessment, QuantiSci (formerly Intera Information Technologies) Report IG2855–TR1 Report to HMIP (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goodess, C.M., Palukitov, J.P., and Davies, T.D. (1991) Studies of climatic effects and impacts relevant to deep underground disposal of radioactive waste, U.K. Nirex Safety Studies Series ReportNSS/R267, U.K. Nirex Ltd., Harwell, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thury, M., Gautschi, A., Mazurek, M., Miller, W., Naef, H., Pear.Son, F.J., Voborny, O., Vomvoris, S., and Wilson, W. (1994) Geology and hydro-geology of the crystalline basement of northern Switzerland. Nagra Technical ReportNTB 93–01E. Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mccombie, C., Mckinley, I., and Zuidema, P. (1991) Sufficient validation: the value of robustness in performance assessment and system design, in Proceedings of Geoval-90, Stockholm, May 1990, NEA/OECD, pp. 598–610.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McEwen, T.J. (1998). Geological Aspects of the Deep Disposal of Radioactive Waste. In: Stenhouse, M.J., Kirko, V.I. (eds) Defence Nuclear Waste Disposal in Russia: International Perspective. NATO ASI Series, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5112-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5112-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6148-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5112-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics