Skip to main content

Kidney exchange programs: an expanded view of the ethical issues

  • Chapter
Organ Allocation

Part of the book series: Transplantation and Clinical Immunology ((TRAC,volume 30))

Abstract

Organ transplantation has dramatically changed medicine: individuals with organ failure were once thought to have irreversible terminal diseases. Today they can be given a second chance at life. Tragically, the supply of organs is inadequate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schaubel D, Desmeules M, Mao Y, Jeffery J, Fenton S. Survival experience among elderly endstage renal disease patients: A controlled comparison of transplantation and dialysis. Transplantation. 1995; 60: 1389–1394.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ojo AO, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Mauger EA, Williams L, Berling DP. Comparative mortality risks of chronic dialysis and cadaveric transplantation in black end-stage renal disease patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1994; 24: 59–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Port FK, Wolfe RA, Mauger EA, Berling DP, Jiang K. Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs cadaveric renal transplant recipients. JAMA. 1993; 270: 1339–1343.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans RW, Manninen DL, Garrison LP et al. The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1985; 312: 553–559.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawry KW, Brouhard BH, Cunningham RJ. Cognitive functioning and school performance in children with renal failure. Ped. Nephrol. 1994; 8: 326–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gudex CM. Health-related qual.life in end stage renal failure. Qual. Life Res. 1995; 4: 359–366.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morris PL, Jones B. Life satisfaction across treatment methods for patients with end-stage renal failure. Med. J. Austr. 1989; 150: 428–432.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karlberg I, Nyberg G. Cost-effectiveness studies of renal transplantation. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care. 1995; 11: 611–622.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eggers P. Comparison of treatment costs between dialysis and transplantation. Sem. Nephrol. 1992; 12: 284–289.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kjellstrand CM, Ericsson F, Traneus A, Noree LO, Lins LE. The wish for renal transplantation. ASAIO Trans. 1989; 35: 619–621.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen KS, Fox DM. The impact of routine inquiry laws on organ donation. Health Affairs. 1988; 7: 65–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ross SE, Nathan H, O’Malley KF. Impact of a required request law on vital organ procurement. J. Trauma. 1990; 30: 820–824.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Virnig BA, Caplan AL. Required request: what difference has it made? Transplant. Proc. 1992; 24: 2155–2158.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganikos ML, McNeil C, Braslow JB et al. A case study in planning for public health education: the organ and tissue donation experience. Pub. Health Rep. 1994: 109: 626–631.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Callender CO, Bey AS, Miles PV, Yeager CL. A national minority organ/tissue transplant education program: the first step in the evolution of a national minority strategy and minority transplant equity in the USA. Transplant. Proc. 1995; 27: 1441–1443.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Overcast TD, Evans RW, Bowen LE, Hoe MM, Livak CL. Problems in the identification of potential organ donors. Misconceptions and fallacies associated with donor cards. JAMA. 1984; 251: 1559–1562.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 1996 Annual Report of the US Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network - Transplant Data: 1988–1995. UNOS, Richmond, VA, and the Division of Transplantation, Bureau of Health Resources Development, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spital A. Unrelated living kidney donors. Transplantation. 1994; 57: 1722–1726.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Spital A. Unconventional living kidney donors - attitudes and use among transplant centers. Transplantation. 1989; 48: 243–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cecka JM, Terasaki PI. The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry. Clin. Transplant. 1994: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gjertson DW. Multifactorial analysis of renal transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry: a 1994 Update. Clin. Transplant. 1994: 519–39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Takemoto S, Terasaki PI. Refinement of permissible HLA mismatches. Clin. Transplant. 1994: 451–66.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Toma H. ABO-incompatible renal transplantation. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 1994; 21: 299–310.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanabe K, Takahashi K Sonda K et al. ABO-incompatible living kidney donor transplantation: results and immunological aspects. Transplant. Proc. 1995; 27: 1020–1023.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Alexandre G, Squifilet JP, De Bruyère M et al. Present experiences in a series of 26 ABO-incompatible living donor renal allografts. Transplant. Proc. 1987; 19: 4538–4542.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cook DJ, Graver B, Terasaki PI. ABO incompatibility in cadaver donor kidney allografts. Transplant. Proc. 1987; 19: 4549–4752.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Starzl TE, Tzakis A, Makowka L et al. The definition of ABO factors in transplantation: relation to other humoral antibody states. Transplant. Proc. 1987; 19: 4492–4497.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nelson PW, Helling TS, Shield CF, Beck M, Bryan CF. Current experience with renal transplantation across the ABO barrier. Am. J. Surg. 1992; 164: 541–5450.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Terasaki PI, Gjertson DW, Cecka JM. Paired kidney exchange is not a solution to ABO incompatibility. Transplantation. 1998; 65: 291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ross LF, Rubin DT, Siegler M, Josephson MA, Thistlethwaite JR Jr, Woodle ES. Ethics of a paired-kidney-exchange program. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997; 336: 1752–1755.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Starzl TE. The puzzle people: memoirs of a transplant surgeon. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lorentzen H, Paterson F. Donations from the living: are the French and Norwegians altruistic? In: Elster J, Herpin N, editors. The Ethics of Medical Choice. London: Pinter; 1994: 100–115.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Najarian JS, Chavers BM, McHugh LE, Matas AJ. 20 years or more of follow-up of living kidney donors. Lancet. 1992; 340: 807–810.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bia MJ, Ramos EL, Danovitch GM et al. Evaluation of living renal donors: the current practice of US transplant centers. Transplantation. 1995; 60: 322–327.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bay WH, Hebert LA. The living donor in kidney transplantation. Ann. Intern. Med. 1987; 106: 719–727.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liounis B, Roy LP, Thompson JF, May J, Shell AG. The living related kidney donor: a follow-up study. Med. J. Austr. 1988; 148: 436–444.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Russell S, Jacob RG. Living-related organ donation: the donor’s dilemma. Patient Educ. Counsel. 1993; 21: 89–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gouge F, Moore J Jr, Bremer BA, McCauly CR, Johnson JR. The quality of life of donors, potential donors, and recipients of living-related donor renal transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 1990; 22: 2409–2413.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fellner CH, Marshall JR. Kidney donors - the myth of informed consent. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1970; 126: 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Simmons RG, Hickey K, Kjellstrand CM, Simmons RL. Family tension in the search for a kidney donor. JAMA. 1971; 215: 909–912.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Simmons RG, Hickey K, Kjellstrand CM, Simmons RL. Donors and non-donors: the role of the family and the physician in kidney transplantation. Semin. Psychiatry. 1971; 3: 102–115.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Smith MD, Kappell DR, Province MA et al. Living-related kidney donors: a multicenter study of donor education, socioeconomic adjustment, and rehabilitation. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1986; 8: 223–233.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Siegler M, Lantos JD. Commentary: ethical justification for living liver donation. Cambridge Q. Health Care. 1992; 1: 320–325.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shimp v. McFall (10 Pa.D. & C.3d 90 (C.P.Ct. 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kruskall MS, Umlas J. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and directed blood donations. A dilemma for American medicine. Arch. Surg. 1988; 123: 23–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pink J, Thomson A, Wylie B. Infectious disease markers in autologous and directed donations. Transfusion Med. 1994; 4: 135–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee CM, Scandling JD, Shen GK, Salvatierra O, Dafoe DC, Alfrey EJ. The kidneys that nobody wanted: support for the utilization of expanded criteria donors. Transplantation. 1996; 62: 1832–1841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ratner LE, Kraus E, Magnuson T, Bender JS. Transplantation of kidneys from expanded criteria donors. Surgery. 1996; 119: 372–377.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Terasaki PI, Cecka JM, Gjertson DW, Takemoto S. High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995; 333: 333–336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Foster v. Harrison, Eq. No. 68674 (Mass., 20 November 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Huskey v. Harrison, Eq. No. 68666 (Mass., 30 August 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Masden v. Harrison, Eq. No. 68651 (Mass., 12 June 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rapaport FT. The case for a living emotionally related international kidney donor exchange registry. Transplant. Proc. 1986; 18 (Suppl. 2): 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  54. World Health Organization: Guiding principles on human organ transplantation. Lancet. 1991; 337: 1470–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. National Organ Transplantation Act Pub L. No 98–507 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act of 1987, §§1–17 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sells, RA. Paired-kidney-exchange programs (letter). N. Engl. J. Med. 1997; 337: 1392–1393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

J. L. Touraine J. Traeger H. Bétuel J. M. Dubernard J. P. Revillard C. Dupuy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ross, L.F., Woodle, E.S. (1998). Kidney exchange programs: an expanded view of the ethical issues. In: Touraine, J.L., Traeger, J., Bétuel, H., Dubernard, J.M., Revillard, J.P., Dupuy, C. (eds) Organ Allocation. Transplantation and Clinical Immunology, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4984-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4984-6_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6091-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4984-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics