Abstract
I would like to examine the relationship between theory and practice in teachers’ professional lives. This question is not only academic, because I worked for more than twenty years in an École Normale, and latterly, in a Institut Universitaire de Formation des Maîtres, where I have to teach students all they have to know about language teaching in the primary school. So I had to involve myself in literacy and in new knowledge and research in the field. My own field was first didactics, but little by little, I expanded my interest into historical process of teaching literacy in school. So I know, as everybody working in this field, what is the dilemma of training. On the one hand, too many things are to be said in too short time, and yet they are (or they seem) very important in helping children learn and young teachers teach. On the other hand, when students have first experienced teaching, they change their point of view. Information on reading or writing processes seems to them too theoretical. They want the tools to work immediately, they ask for practical gimmicks and recipes. They say: “We haven’t enough time and we need to know how to do it.” Teachers we meet in schools often consider what we are learning at college as useless in becoming efficient in practice. Numerous studies confirm that the knowledge produced by researchers (in all disciplines) rarely satisfies the expectations of practitioners. When teachers seek documentation, they prefer information that is directly usable (Huberman, 1983), they want “how to” suggestions rather than “why” explanations, they look for recommendations for specific types of activities, rather than explanatory talks or models. What I tell through my experience, shows a dilemma between two opposite ways of treating literacy in teacher training. One takes into account what is well known, or what is in debate today in this field. The other takes into account what teachers are doing and how they can be used as models by young teachers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barbier J.M. (Ed.) (1995). Savoirs théoriques et savoirs d’action. Paris: P.U.F.
Berstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control, Vol. 1. London: Routledge and Kenan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. (1975). Langage et classes sociales. Paris: Ed. de Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1976). Sociolinguistique — Le parler ordinaire, 2 vols. Paris: Ed. de Minuit.
Chall, J.S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chartier, A.M., Debayle, J. and Jachimowicz, M.P. (1993). Lectures pratiquées et lectures déclarées. Réflexions autour d’une enquête sur la lecture des étudiants en IUFM. In E. Fraisse (Ed.), Les étudiants et la lecture (pp. 73–99). Paris: P.U.F.
Chevallard, Y. (1985). L? transposition didactique, Du savoir savant au savoir enseigne. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
Education Permanente, 100–101, décembre 1989, no. spécial “Apprendre par l’expérience” (Courtois B. dir.).
Huberman, M. (1983). Répertoire, recettes et vie de classe: Comment les enseignants utilisent l’information. Education et Recherche, 5(2), 157–177.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as a source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ouzoulias, R. (1985). Les instituteurs et les canaux d’information pédagogique. Perspectives Documentaires en Sciences de l’Education, 6, 74–94.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflexive practitioner. How professionals think in action. U.S.A.: Basic Books. (French translation Le practicien réflexif A la recherche du savoir caché dans l’agir professionel. Montréal: Editions Logiques, coll. Formation des maîtres, 1994).
Schön, D. (1995). A la recherche d’une nouvelle épistémologie de 1a pratique et de ce qu’elle implique pour l’éducation des adultes. In J.M. Barbier (Ed.), Savoir théoriques et savoirs d’action (pp. 202–222). Paris: P.U.F.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chartier, AM. (1999). Theoretical Discussions and Pedagogical Practice: How “Theorization” can Help in Teacher Training. In: Nunes, T. (eds) Learning to Read: An Integrated View from Research and Practice. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4826-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4826-9_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5992-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4826-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive