Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Neuropsychology and Cognition ((NPCO,volume 17))

Abstract

For many years, the debates in the teaching of reading were dominated by the tensions between “teaching phonics” and “the whole language approach” (for a thoughtful comment on this controversy, see Beard, 1995). It is quite likely that most teachers realised that both approaches, if treated in a radical manner, were leaving aside significant aspects of literacy but that they found it difficult to escape polarization in this debate. The two teaching approaches are derived from different common sense views of reading — and, as it turned out later, they also differed theoretically [but note that the debate existed in the domain of teaching reading before the theoretical models came to the fore; see, for example, Isaacs, 1930].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aidinis, A. and Nunes, T. (1998). The role of different levels of phonological awareness in the development of reading and spelling in Greek. Reading and Writing, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, R. (1995). Children’s writing in primary school. London: Hodder & Stroughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P.E. and Bradley, L. (1985). Children’s reading problems. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P.E., Bradley, L., et al. (1989). Nursery rhymes, phonological skills and reading. Journal of Child Language, 16, 407–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Devine, M., Ledward, A. and Nunes, T. (1997). Spelling with apostrophes and understanding possession. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The sound patterns of English. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreiro, E. and Teberosky, A. (1983). Literacy before schooling. London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A.E. and Liberman, I.Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, S.S. (1930). Intellectual growth in young children. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes Carraher, T. (1985). Explorações sobre o desenvolvimento da ortografia em Português (Exploring the development of orthography in Portuguese). Psicologia, Teoria e Pesquisa, 1, 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes Carraher, T. and Rego, L.L.B. (1981). Orealismo nominal como obstáculo na aprendizagem da leitura. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 39, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P.E., et al. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 637–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, L.L.B. and Bryant, P.E. (1993). The connection between phonological, syntactic and semantic skills and children’s reading and spelling. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R.L. (1995). How English is read: Grapheme-phoneme regularity and orthographic structure in word recognition. In I. Taylor and D.R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 111–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Landed, K. and Schneider, W. (1994). The role of rhyme awareness in learning to read a regular orthography. British Journal of Development Psychology, 12, 469–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nunes, T. (1999). Introductory Comments. In: Nunes, T. (eds) Learning to Read: An Integrated View from Research and Practice. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4826-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4826-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5992-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4826-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics