Abstract
For many years, the debates in the teaching of reading were dominated by the tensions between “teaching phonics” and “the whole language approach” (for a thoughtful comment on this controversy, see Beard, 1995). It is quite likely that most teachers realised that both approaches, if treated in a radical manner, were leaving aside significant aspects of literacy but that they found it difficult to escape polarization in this debate. The two teaching approaches are derived from different common sense views of reading — and, as it turned out later, they also differed theoretically [but note that the debate existed in the domain of teaching reading before the theoretical models came to the fore; see, for example, Isaacs, 1930].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aidinis, A. and Nunes, T. (1998). The role of different levels of phonological awareness in the development of reading and spelling in Greek. Reading and Writing, in press.
Beard, R. (1995). Children’s writing in primary school. London: Hodder & Stroughton.
Bryant, P.E. and Bradley, L. (1985). Children’s reading problems. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bryant, P.E., Bradley, L., et al. (1989). Nursery rhymes, phonological skills and reading. Journal of Child Language, 16, 407–428.
Bryant, P., Devine, M., Ledward, A. and Nunes, T. (1997). Spelling with apostrophes and understanding possession. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 93–112.
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The sound patterns of English. New York: McGraw Hill.
Ferreiro, E. and Teberosky, A. (1983). Literacy before schooling. London: Heinemann Educational.
Fowler, A.E. and Liberman, I.Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Isaacs, S.S. (1930). Intellectual growth in young children. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Nunes Carraher, T. (1985). Explorações sobre o desenvolvimento da ortografia em Português (Exploring the development of orthography in Portuguese). Psicologia, Teoria e Pesquisa, 1, 269–285.
Nunes Carraher, T. and Rego, L.L.B. (1981). Orealismo nominal como obstáculo na aprendizagem da leitura. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 39, 3–10.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P.E., et al. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 637–649.
Rego, L.L.B. and Bryant, P.E. (1993). The connection between phonological, syntactic and semantic skills and children’s reading and spelling. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 235–246.
Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stanovich, K.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.
Venezky, R.L. (1995). How English is read: Grapheme-phoneme regularity and orthographic structure in word recognition. In I. Taylor and D.R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 111–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wimmer, H., Landed, K. and Schneider, W. (1994). The role of rhyme awareness in learning to read a regular orthography. British Journal of Development Psychology, 12, 469–484.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nunes, T. (1999). Introductory Comments. In: Nunes, T. (eds) Learning to Read: An Integrated View from Research and Practice. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4826-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4826-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5992-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4826-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive