Skip to main content

Morphotype-specific predation in the trimorphic rotifer Asplanchna silvestrii

  • Conference paper
Rotifera VIII: A Comparative Approach

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 134))

Abstract

Several species of the predatory rotifer Asplanchna exhibit dramatic diet-induced trimorphism. The three morphotypes differ greatly in body shape and size, attributes that should affect predation ability. It has been hypothesized that these morphotypes evolved to exploit different prey assemblages in different environments. Here I compare the predatory behavior of the campanulate morphotype (the largest) to that of the cruciform morphotype (the intermediate) using crustacean and conspecific prey. These prey are known to induce production of the greatest proportion of campanulates. I hypothesize that the campanulate is better able to exploit these relatively large prey than are cruciforms. The campanulates did have higher ingestion rates with conspecific prey, but the ingestion rates of the morphotypes were not different with the crustacean prey, due to the campanulate’s relatively low probability of attacking the crustacean prey. The campanulate attack probability is higher with both conspecific and crustacean prey than has been previously reported for campanulate A. silvestrii with smaller rotifer prey. While the campanulate handles both relatively large prey with comparative ease, and is more likely to attack these prey than smaller rotifer prey, the campanulate morphotype seems most effective at cannibalism due to its high preference for congeneric prey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Birky, C. W. & J. A. Power, 1969. The developmental genetics of polymorphism in the rotifer Asplanchna. J. exp. Zool. 170: 157–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Commins, M. L. & G. W. Salt, 1988. Some patterns of predation and prey selection by the rotifer Asplanchna girodi in replicated outdoor tanks. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 23: 2028–2032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conde-Porcuna, J. M., R. Morales-Baquero & L. Cruz-Pizarro, 1993. Effectiveness of the caudal spine as a defense mechanism in Keratella cochlearis. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conde-Porcuna, J. M., & S. S. S. Sarma, 1995. Prey selection by Asplanchna girodi (Rotifera): the importance of prey defence mechanisms. Freshwat. Biol. 33: 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1973. The induction and ecological significance of gigantism in the rotifer Asplanchna sieboldi. Science 181: 64–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1975. Polymorphism in the rotifer Asplanchna sieboldi: Variability in the body-wall-outgrowth response to dietary tocopherol. Physiol. Zool. 48: 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1976. Selective cannibalism in the rotifer Asplanchna sieboldi: contact recognition of morphotype and clone. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73: 3233–3237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1978. Selective feeding and its effect on polymorphism and sexuality in the rotifer Asplanchna sieboldi. Freshwat. Biol. 8: 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1980a. Developmental polymorphism in the rotifer Asplanchna sieboldi. Am. Sci. 68: 636–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1980b. Feeding in the rotifer Asplanchna: behavior, cannibalism, selectivity, prey defenses, and impact on rotifer communities. In W. C. Kerfoot (ed.), Evolution and Ecology in Zooplankton Communities. The University Press of New England, Hanover (NH): 158–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J. & J. L. Confer, 1986. Gigantism and the potential for interference competition in the rotifer genus Asplanchna. Oecologia 70: 549–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J. & J. D. Jack, 1993. Rotifers as predators on small ciliates. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 247–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J. & R. S. Stemberger, 1985. The costs and benefits of gigantism in polymorphic species of the rotifer Asplanchna. Arch. Hydrobiol. 21: 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J. & C. E. Williamson, 1978. Predator-prey behavior and its effect on rotifer survival in associations of Mesocyclops edax, Asplanchna girodi, Polyarthra vulgaris, and Keratella cochlearis. Oecologia 37: 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. & O. B. Lan, 1974. Asplanchna and the spines of Brachionus calyciflorus in two Javanese sewage ponds. Freshwat. Biol. 4: 223–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, S. E. & P. L. Starkweather, in press. Differences in prédation among morphotypes of the rotifer Asplanchna silvestrii. Freshwat. Biol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. H., M. S. Mulla & H. R. Willson, 1972. Effects of an organophosphorus insecticide on the phytoplankton, zooplankton, and insect populations of fresh-water ponds. Ecol. Monogr. 42: 269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, N. & T. R. Rao, 1996. Responses of the predatory rotifer Asplanchna intermedia to prey species differing in vulnerability: laboratory and field studies. Freshwat. Biol. 36: 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. H., 1912. A case of polymorphism in Asplanchna simulating a mutation. Am. Nat. 46: 441–462, 526–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. W., 1977. An analysis of the diets of five sympatric species of Asplanchna. Arch. Hydrobiol. 8: 123–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma, S. S. S., 1993. Feeding responses of Asplanchna brightwelli (Rotifera): laboratory and field studies. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkweather, P. L. & E. J. Walsh, 1989. Influence of cyanobacterial diet on Asplanchna predation risk in Brachionus calyciflorus. Hydrobiologia, 186/187: 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, R. S., 1981. A general approach to the culture of planktonic rotifers. Can. J. Fish, aquat. Sci. 38: 721–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urabe, J., 1992. Midsummer succession of rotifer plankton in a shallow eutrophic pond. J. Plankton Res. 14: 851–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

E. Wurdak R. Wallace H. Segers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hampton, S.E. (1998). Morphotype-specific predation in the trimorphic rotifer Asplanchna silvestrii . In: Wurdak, E., Wallace, R., Segers, H. (eds) Rotifera VIII: A Comparative Approach. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 134. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4782-8_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4782-8_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6009-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4782-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics