Abstract
The varieties of organizational forms societies have developed in their evolution have always been cornerstones of social analysis. From such a perspective institutions ranging from kinship and family structures to state organizations were often conceived as the basic elements of social organization, fulfilling important tasks in societal reproduction and social integration. As a consequence of the behaviorist revolution in the social sciences and the rise of functionalist systems theory, empirical institutions as analytical entities paradoxically lost their importance. In the search for the fundamental forces which are shaping human action, system-functionalism treated institutions as only surface phenomena. When this viewpoint declined in the last decade and when the “sociological deficit” of the new dominant rational choice approach became apparent, the social sciences were in the same way rediscovering the importance of empirical institutional analysis.1 From this new perspective, institutions are seen as autonomous entities which exist in their own right and play an important role in societal self-regulation. Similar theoretical developments took place in economics, where empirical institutions have been disregarded for a long time. In neoclassic theory, for instance, the fiction of the market as “the natural state” of economic organization was for a long time the dominant perspective.2 Since the 1970s, however, there is a trend toward the formulation of theories which take into account the variety of organizational forms that historical societies have invented. In this undertaking the concept of governance structures plays a significant role.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, K. A. 1971. “The Organization of Economic Activity. Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Non-market Allocation.” In Public Expenditures and Policy Analysis, ed. R. H. Haveman and J. Margolis, pp. 59–73. Chicago: Markham Publishing.
Bauer, J. M. 1988. Alternative Governance Structures for Infrastructure Sectors: Notes on an Institutional Design Problem. EUI Colloquium Papers. Florence: Badia Fiesolana.
Bauer, J., and Latzer, M. 1988. “Telecommunications in Austria.” In Müller and Foreman-Peck 1988, pp. 53–84.
Beniger, J. R. 1986. The Control Revolution. Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bennett, C. J. 1988. “Regulating the Computer: Comparing Policy Instruments in Europe and the United States.” European Journal of Political Research 16: 437–66.
Bertho-Lavenir, C. 1988. “The Telephone in France 1879 to 1979: National Characteristics and International Influences.” In Mayntz and Hughes, eds., 1988, pp. 155–77.
Blankart, C. B. 1984. “Das Wachstum des Postmonopols [in der Schweiz]: Ein wirtschaftshistorischer Beitrag zur ökonomischen Theorie der Verwaltung.” Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie 3: 172–97.
Boisot, M., and Child, J. 1988. “The Iron Law of Fiefs: Bureaucratic Failure and the Problem of Governance in the Chinese Economic Reforms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 507–27.
Bottiglieri, B. 1987. STET. Strategie e struttura delle telecommunicazioni. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Bowman, J. R. 1989. “Transaction Costs and Politics.” Archive of European Sociology 30: 150–68.
Brock, G. W. 1982. The Telecommunications Industry: The Dynamics of Market Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Cawson, A.; Morgan, K.; Holmes, S.; Stevens, A.; and Webber, D. 1990. Hostile Brothers: Competition and Closure in the European Electronics Industry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Canter, D., ed. 1985. Facet Theory: Approaches to Social Research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Child, J. 1987. “Information Technology, Organization, and the Response to Strategic Challenges.” California Management Review 30.
Crew, M., and Kleindorfer, P. R. 1985. “Governance Structures for Natural Monopoly: A Comparative Institutional Assessment.” Journal of Behavioural Economics 14: 117–40.
Dang-Nguyen, G. 1985. “Telecommunications: A Challenge to the Old Order.” In Europe and the New Technologies, ed. M. Sharp. London: Pinter.
Dang-Nguyen, G. 1986. “État et Enterprise Publique: Les PTT Européens et leur Environnement (1).” Revue des Politiques et Management 1: 119–52.
Diebold GmbH, ed. 1971. “Bedeutung und Entwicklung der automatischen Datenverarbeitung.” Computer und Angestellte I (Frankfurt: EVA).
DIW, ed. 1987. “Zur Neuordnung der Fernmeldemärkte.” Wochenbericht 54, 37: 493.
Du Boff, R. B. 1984. “The Telegraph in Nineteenth-Century America: Technology and Monopoly.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26, 4: 571–86.
Foreman-Peck, J., and Manning, D. 1988. “Telecommunications in the United Kingdom.” In Müller and Foreman-Peck 1988: 257–78.
Galambos, L. 1988. “Looking for the Boundaries of Technological Determinism: A Brief History of the U.S. Telephone System.” In Mayntz and Hughes 1988.
Gebhardt, H.-P. 1989. “Rechtsgrundlagen des Datenschutzes sowie Datenschutz im Fernmeldewesen der Länder Schweiz, Frankreich, Niederlande, Großbritannien, Schweden, USA und Japan.” In Archiv für das Post- und Fernmeldewesen 2: 163–69.
Gibbons, J. H., and Gwin, H. L. 1985. “Technology and Governance.” Technology In Society 7: 333–52.
Grande, E. 1989. Vom Monopol zum Wettbewerb? Die neokonservative Reform der Telekommunikation in Großbritannien und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Dt. Univ. Verlag.
Granstrand, O., and Sigurdson, J. 1985. “The Role of Public Procurement in Technological Innovation and Industrial Development in the Telecommunication Sector. The Case of Sweden.” In Technological Innovation and Industrial Development in Telecommunications, ed. O. Granstrand and J. Sigurdson, pp. 149–72. Gothenburg.
Harris, R. G. 1989. “Telecommunications Policy in Japan: Lessons for the U.S.” In California Management Review 3: 113–31.
Heuermann, A.; Neumann, K.-H.; and Schnöring, Th. 1986. Telekommunikationspolitik im Vergleich—Eine problemorientierte Übersicht über die Länder USA, Großbritannien, Frankreich, Niederlande, Schweden und Japan. Bad Windsheim: Heidecker.
Hills, J. 1989. “Neo-conservative Regimes and Convergence in Telecommunications Policy.” In European Journal of Political Research 17: 95–113.
Holecombe, A. 1911. Public Ownership of Telephones on the Continent of Europe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hollingsworth, J. R., and Lindberg, L. N. 1985. “The Governance of the American Economy: The Role of Markets, Clans, Hierarchies, and Associative Behaviour.” In Private Interest Government, ed. W. Streeck and P. C. Schmitter. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hughes, T. P. 1987. “The Evolution of Large Technical Systems.” In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and Pinch, T., The Social Construction of Technological Systems. (Cambridge: MIT Press).
Hyden, G. 1988. “Dilemmas of Governance in Africa: Report on Work in Progress.” Paper presented at the XIVth IPSA World Congress, Washington, D.C., August/September 1988.
Kaijser, A. 1987. “From Local Networks to National Systems. A Comparison of the Emergence of Electricity and Telephony in Sweden.” In 1880–1980: Un Siècle D’Électricité dans le Monde, ed. F. Cardot, pp. 7–22. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Katz, M. L., and Shapiro, C. 1985. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility.” American Economic Review 75: 424–40.
Katzenstein, P. 1987. Policy and Politics in West Germany. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
La Porte, Todd R. 1984. Technology as Social Organization. IGS Studies in Public Organization Working Paper No. 84-1. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.
Lehmbruch, G.; Singer, O.; Grande, E.; and Döhler, M. 1988. “Institutionelle Bedingungen ordnungspolitischen Strategiewechsels im internationalen Vergleich.” In Staatstätigkeit. International und historisch vergleichende Analysen (PVS Sonderheft 19), ed. M. G. Schmidt. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Libois, L.-J. 1983. Genèse et Croissance des Télécommunication. Paris: Masson.
Lindberg, L. N., Campbell, J. L.; and Hollingsworth, J. R. Forthcoming. “Economic Governance and the Analysis of Structural Change in the American Economy.” In The Governance of American Economy, ed. J. L. Campbell, J. R. Hollingsworth, and L. N. Lindberg, pp. 1–82.
March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78: 734–48.
Mayntz, R. 1988. “Zur Entwicklung technischer Infrastruktursysteme.” In Differenzierung und Verselbständigung. Zur Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme, ed. R. Mayntz, B. Rosewitz, U. Schimanck, and R. Stichweh, pp. 233–59. Frankfurt: Campus.
Mayntz, R., and Hughes, T. P., eds. 1988. The Development of Large Technical Systems. Frankfurt: Campus; Boulder: Westview.
Metelski, J. 1978. “Telecommunications Privacy and the Information Society.” Telecommunications Policy 4: 327–35.
Mitchell, B. M. 1983. “The Cost of Telephone Service. An International Comparison of Rates in Major Countries.” Telecommunications Policy 2: 53–63.
Müller, J., and Foreman-Peck, J., eds. 1988. European Telecommunications Organisation. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Neumann, K.-H. 1987. Die Neuorganisation der Telekommunikation in Japan. Berlin: Springer.
Noam, E. M. 1989. “International Telecommunications in Transition.” In Changing the Rules: Technological Change, International Competition, and Regulation in Communications, ed. R. W. Crandall and K. Ramm, pp. 257–97. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
North, D. C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York and London: Norton.
OECD 1973. Computers and Telecommunications. Paris: OECD.
OECD. 1987. Trends of Change in Telecommunications Policy. Paris: OECD.
OECD. 1989. “Present Situation and Trends in Privacy Protection in the OECD Area. STI Review 6 (December): 179–213.
Ouchi, W. G. 1980. “Markets, Bureaucracies and dans.” Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 129–45.
Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with the High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.
Schmitter, P. C. 1989. “Sectors in Modern Capitalism: Modes of Governance and Variations in Performance” [“I settori nel capitalismo moderno: modi di regolazione e variazione nel rendimento”]. Stato e mercato 26 (1989): 173–208.
Schneider, V. 1989. Technikentwicklung zwischen Politik und Markt: Der Fall Bildschirmtext. Frankfurt: Campus.
Schneider, V.; Vedel, T.; and J. Miller. 1990. “The State and New Forms of Communication: The Introduction of Videotex in Europe and North America.” In State Policies and Techno-Industrial Innovation, ed. Ulrich Hilpert. London: Routledge.
Shepsle, K. A. 1989. “Studying Institutions. Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2: 131–47.
Snow, M. S. 1982. “Telecommunications and Media Policy in West Germany: Recent Developments.” Journal of Communication 2: 10–32.
Takanashi, N., et al. 1988. “The Achilles” Heel of the Information Society: Socioeconomic Impacts of the Telecommunication Cable Fire in the Setagaya Telephone Office, Tokyo.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 34: 27–52.
Thomas, F. 1988. “The Politics of Growth: The German Telephone System.” In Mayntz and Hughes 1988, pp. 179–209.
Tomita, T. 1984: “Japan’s Policy on Monopoly and Competition in Telecommunications.” Telecommunications Policy 8, 1: 44–50.
Vedel, T. 1988. “La Déréglementation des Télécommunications en France: Politique et Jeu Politique.” In Le Déréglementations. Étude Comparative, ed. B. Chend, pp. 281–312. Paris: Economica.
Weingart, P. 1989. “Großtechnische Systeme: ein Paradigma der Verknüpfung von Technikentwicklung und sozialem Wandel.” In Technik als sozialer Prozeß, ed. P. Weingart, pp. 174–96. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Werle, R. 1990. Telekommunikation in der Bundesrepublik: Expansion, Differenzierung, Transformation. Frankfurt: Campus.
Wieland, B. 1985. Die Entflechtung des amerikanischen Fernmeldemonopols. Berlin: Springer.
Wieland, B. 1988. “Telecommunications in Netherlands.” In Müller and Foreman-Peck 1988, pp. 203–219.
Williamson, O. E. 1985. “Reflections on the Institutional Economics.” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 141: 187–95.
Williamson, E. O. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, E. O. 1986. “The Economics of Governance: Framework and Implications.” In Economics as a Process. Essays in the New Institutional Economics, ed. R. N. Langlois. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittfogel, K. A. 1962. Die orientalische Despotie. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung totaler Macht. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneider, V. (1991). The Governance of Large Technical Systems: The Case of Telecommunications. In: La Porte, T.R. (eds) Social Responses to Large Technical Systems. NATO ASI Series, vol 58. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3400-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3400-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5504-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3400-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive