Abstract
In spite of the marvellous successes of quantum mechanics in explaining microscopic phenomena occurring at nuclear, atomic and molecular levels, this theory still today presents embarrassing conceptual problems. Fundamentally, they are indeterminism and nonseparability, and the related problems connected with the quantum description of macroscopic objects and measurement theory.
[Quantum Mechanics has] two powerful bodies of fact in its favour, and only one thing against it. First, in its favour are all the marvellous agreements that the theory has had with every experimental result to date. Second [...] it is a theory of astonishing and profound mathematical beauty. The one thing that can be said against it is that it makes absolutely no sense! Roger Penrose
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bell, J.S.: 1987, Speakilble and Unspeakilble in Quantum Mechanics; Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 139.
Bohrn, D.: 1951, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, New York.
Born, M.: 1971, The Born-Einstein letters (ed. by M. Born), Macmillan, London, p. 158.
D‘Espagnat, B.: 1989, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass., p. 81.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N.: 1935, Phys. Rev. 47, 777.
Feynmann, R.P.: 1982, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 471.
Ghirardi, G.C., Rimini, A., Weber, T., and Omero, C.: 1977, Il Nuovo Cimento B 39,130.
Ghirardi, G.c., Rimini, A., and Weber, T.: 1980, Lettere al Nuovo Cimento 27, 293.
Jammer, M.: 1974, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, New York, pp. 161,204.
Jauch, J.M.: 1968, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass., p. 111.
Schrödinger, E.: 1935, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31, 555.
Schrödinger, E.: 1957, ‘What is a law of nature?’, in Science, Theory and Man, Dover, New York, p.133.
Sudbery, A.: 1986, Quantum Mechanics and the Particles of Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 212.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weber, T. (1993). Indeterminism, Nonseparability and the Einstein-Podolsky - Rosen Paradox. In: Corsi, G., Chiara, M.L.D., Ghirardi, G.C. (eds) Bridging the Gap: Philosophy, Mathematics, and Physics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 140. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2496-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2496-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5101-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2496-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive