Abstract
Literacy means the abilities to read and write. Because people learn to read and write simultaneously, the word literacy is usually used to refer to the ability to read alone. The ability to read itself has two components: decoding spelling into sound and decoding spelling into meaning. As Taylor (1987) pointed out recently, there are many factors that can affect our ability to decode spelling into sound and our ability to decode spelling into meaning. In the following, only those script factors that have been studied in our laboratory will be presented with an aim at elucidating their differential effects on the processing of English as an alphabetic language and the processing of Chinese as a logographic language. The first section dealt with the processes of decoding symbols into meanings; and the second, with the processes of decoding symbols into sounds.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aaronson, D. and Ferns, S.: 1986, ‘Sentence processing in Chinese-American bilinguals’ Journal of Memory and Language 25: 136–162.
Ai, W.: 1924, ‘A study of frequently used characters and their form, sound, and meaning’ Teaching and Learning 3, No. 5.
Ambler, B.A. and Proctor, J.D.: 1976, ‘The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2: 222–234.
Baron, J.: 1977, ‘Mechanisms for pronouncing printed words: Use and acquisition’, in D. LaBerge and S. J. Samuels (eds.) Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension Erlbaum, New York, pp. 175–216.
Biederman, I. and Tsao, Y.-C.: 1979, ‘On processing Chinese ideographs and English words: Some implications for Stroop-test results’ Cognitive Psychology 11: 125–132.
Brooks, L.: 1977, ‘Visual pattern in fluent word identification’, in A.S. Reber and D.L. Scarborough (eds.) Toward a Psychology of Reading Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Brown, G.D.A.: 1987. ‘Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming’ Journal of Memory and Language 26: 1–23.
Cheng, C.M.: 1982, ‘Analysis of present-day Mandarin’ Journal of Chinese Linguistics 10: 281–358.
Coltheart, M.: 1978, ‘Lexical access in simple reading tasks’, in G. Underwood (ed.) Strategies in information processing Academic Press, London, pp. 151–216.
Egeth, H. and Becker, D.: 1971, ‘Differential effects of familiarity on judgments of sameness and differences’ Perception and Psychophysics 9: 321–326.
Forster, K.I. and Chambers, S.M.: 1973, ‘Lexical access and naming time’ Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 627–635.
Frederiksen, J.R. and Kroll, J.F.: 1976, ‘Spelling and sound: approaches to the internal lexicon’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2: 361–379.
Gluskho, R.: 1979, ‘The organization and activation of othographic knowledge in reading aloud’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5: 674–691.
Hansen, D. and Rogers, T.S.: 1973, ‘An exploration of psycholinguistic units in initial reading’, in K.S. Good (ed.) The Psycholinguistic Nature of the Reading Process Wayne State University Press, Detroit.
Henderson, L.: 1982 Orthography and visual word recognition in reading Academic Press, New York.
Hue, C.W.: 1992, ‘Recognition processes in character naming’, in H.C. Chen and O.J.L. Tzeng (eds.) Language processing in Chinese Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
Jeng, C.I., Lai, M.W., and Liu, I.M.: 1973, ‘Category norms in Chinese and English from bilingual subjects’ Acta Psychologica Taiwanica 15: 81–153.
Johnson-Laird, P.N.: 1983 Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language inference and consciousness Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Liu, I.-M.: 1988, ‘Context effects on word/character naming: Alphabetic versus logographics languages’, in I.-M. Liu, H.-C. Chen, and M.-J. Chen (eds.) Cognitive aspects of the Chinese Language (Vol. 1) Asian Research Service, Hong Kong.
Liu, I.-M., Chou, T.-L., and Wu, J.-T.: 1993 Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect National Chung-Cheng University.
Liu, I.-M., Chuang, C.-J., and Wang, S.-C.: 1975 Frequency count of 40,000 Chinese words Lucky Books, Taipei, Taiwan.
Liu, I.-M., Zhu, Y., and Wu, J.-T.: 1992, ‘The long-term modality effect: In search of differences in processing logographs and alphabetic words’ Cognition 43: 31–66.
Marcel, T.: 1980, ‘Surface dyslexia and beginning reading: A revised hypothesis of the pronunciation of print and its impairments’, in M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, and J.C. Marshall (eds.) Deep dyslexia Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
McClelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D.E.: 1985, ‘Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 114: 159–188.
Miller, G.A.: 1951 Language and communication McGraw-Hill, New York.
Park, S. and Arbuckle, T.Y.: 1977, ‘Ideograms versus alphabets Effect of script on memory in “biscriptural” Korean subjects’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3: 631–642.
Rosson, M.B.: 1983, ‘From SOFA to LOUCH: Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation’ Memory and Cognition 11: 152–160.
Rosson, M.B.: 1985, ‘The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud’ Memory and Cognition 13: 90–99.
Rubin, D.C.: 1980, ‘51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of verbal behavior’ Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23: 23–38.
Rubin, D.C.: 1983, ‘Associative asymmetry, availability, and retrieval’ Memory and Cognition 11: 83–92.
Rubin, D.C. and Friendly, M.: 1986, ‘Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns’ Memory and Cognition 14: 79–94.
Saffran, E.M.: 1985, ‘Acquired dyslexia: Implications for models of reading’, in G.E. MacKinnon and T.G. Waller (eds.) Reading research: Advances in Theory and Practice (Vol. 1) Academic Press, London, pp. 231–258.
Seidenberg, M.S.: 1985, ‘The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems’ Cognition 19: 1–30.
Seidenberg, M.S. and McClelland, J.L.: 1989, ‘A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming’ Psychological Review 96: 523–568.
Seidenberg, M.S., Waters, G.D., Barnes, M.A., and Tanenhause, M.K.: 1983, ‘When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?’ Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23: 383–404.
Shallice, T., Warrington, K.E., and McCarthy, R.: 1983, ‘Reading without semantics’ Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 35A: 111–138.
Shallice, T. and McCarthy, R.: 1985, ‘The operation of the phonological route: Evidence from “phonologic reading” in acquired dyslexic patients’, in K. Patterson, J. Marshall, and M. Coltheart (eds.) Surface dyslexia Erlbaum, London.
Taylor, I.: 1987, ‘Psychology of literacy: East and west’, in D. de Kerckhove and C. Lumsden (eds.) The alphabet and the brain: Relateralization of writing Springer-Verlag, New York.
Thorndike, E.L. and Lorge, I.: 1944 The teacher’s wordbook of 30,000 words Teachers College Press, New York.
Tung Lai: 1978 Recognizing Chinese Characters Mingjen, Taipei.
Turnage, T.W. and McGinnies, E.: 1973, ‘A cross-cultural comparison of the effects of presentation mode and meaningfulness in short-term recall’ American Journal of Psychology 86: 369–381.
Tzeng, O.J.L. and Hung D.L.: 1988, ‘Cerebral organization: Clues from scriptal effects on lateralization’, in I. M. Liu, H.C. Chen, and M.J. Chen (eds.) Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (Vol. 1), Asian Research Service, Hong Kong.
Tzeng, O.J.L., Hung, D.L., and Wang, W.S.Y.: 1977, Speech recoding in reading Chinese characters’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3: 621–630.
Venezky, R.L.: 1970 The Structure of English Orthography Mouton, The Hague.
Venezky, R.L. and Calfee, R.C.: 1970, ‘The reading competency model’, in H. Singer and R.B. Ruddell (eds.) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading International Reading Association, Newark.
Wijk, A.: 1966 Rules of Pronunciation for the English Language Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Zhou, Y.-G.: 1978, ‘To what degree are the “phonetics” of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic?’ Zhongguo Yuwen 146: 172–177.
Zhu, Y., Liu, I.-M., Shieh, Y.-T., and Fan, C.: 1992, ‘Differences in visual and auditory word frequencies and the visual superiority effect in Chinese’, in P.-Z. Kuang and C.-T. Chang (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on cognitive aspects of the Chinese language Science, Beijing.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, IM. (1995). Script Factors that Affect Literacy: Alphabetic vs. Logographic Languages. In: Taylor, I., Olson, D.R. (eds) Scripts and Literacy. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1162-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1162-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4506-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1162-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive