Skip to main content

Seismological Methods for Monitoring a CTBT: The Technical Issues Arising in Early Negotiations

  • Chapter
Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSE,volume 303))

Abstract

The most important technical issues in monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty all became apparent between 1958, when the so-called “Conference of Experts” was convened in Geneva, and 1963, when the Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT) was negotiated, signed, ratified, and put into effect. The LTBT was negotiated trilaterally, between the United States, the Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom; and banned nuclear testing in space, in the atmosphere, and under water. But in 1963 there was a general perception that seismological methods for monitoring underground nuclear explosions were inadequate — a perception that helped strongly to prevent the conclusion of a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) in this period, even though the key leaders (Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy for the US, General Secretary Khrushchev for the USSR, and Prime Minister Macmillan for the UK) apparently favored a comprehensive ban and made numerous proposals on how it might be implemented and verified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kerr, D.M. (1988) in J. Goldblat and D. Cox (eds.), Nuclear Weapons Tests: Prohibition or Limitation?, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Magraw, K. (1988) Teller and the Clean Bomb Episode, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May issue, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilpin, R. (1962) American Scientists and Nuclear Weapons Policy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson, H.K., and E. Stein (1966) Diplomats, Scientists, and Politicians: The United States and the Nuclear Test Ban Negotiations, Univ. of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, G.W. (1985) Underground Nuclear Weapons Testing and Seismology — a Cooperative Effort, in The VELA Program: A Twenty-Five Year Review of Basic Research, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The New York Times (1958), April 3, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conference of Experts to Study the Methods of Detecting Violations of a Possible Agreement on the Suspension of Nuclear Tests (1958) Verbatim Records.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teller, E. (1958), Alternatives for Security, Foreign Affairs 36, p. 204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murray, T. (1959) East and West Face the Atom, The New Leader, June 15, pp. 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. US Congress (1959) Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on Disarmament, Hearings: Geneva Test Ban Negotiations, 86th Congress, 1st Session, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ringdal, F. (1985) Study of magnitudes, seismicity and earthquake detectability using a global network, in The VELA Program: A Twenty-Five Year Review of Basic Research, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, p. 611.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Romney, C. (1960) Detection of Underground Explosions, in Project Vela, Proceedings of a Symposium, October, pp. 39–75.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy, J. (1981) P-wave coupling of underground explosions in various geologic media, in E.S. Husebye and S. Mykkeltveit (eds.), Identification of Seismic Sources — Earthquake or Explosion, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 201–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ringdal, F., P.D. Marshall and R. Alewine (1992) Seismic yield determination of Soviet underground nuclear explosions at the Shagan River test site, Geophysical Journal International 109, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. US Department of Defense (1959) Press Release, Jan 16.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Latter, A., R. LeLevier, E. Martinelli, W. McMillan (1959) A Method of Concealing Underground Nuclear Explosions, RAND Corporation, Mar. 30. Subsequently published (1961) Journal of Geophysical Research 66, 943–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Street, K. (1959) Need for High Explosive and Nuclear Tests for Research Program, Report of the Berkner Panel, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Report of the Berkner Panel (1959), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Project Vela, Proceedings of a Symposium (1960), October.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bethe, H. (1960) The Case for Ending Atomic Testing, The Atlantic Monthly 206, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Conference on the Discontinuance of Nuclear Weapon Tests, Geneva (1958–62) Verbatim Records, section 188, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Latter, A. (1960) Decoupling of underground explosions, in Project Vela, Proceedings of a Symposium, October, p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kistiakowsky, G.B. (1976) A Scientist at the White House, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Romney, C. (1962) US Congress, Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Hearings: Developments in the Field of Detection and Identification of Nuclear Explosions (Project Vela) and their Relationship to Test Ban Negotiations, 87th Congress, 1st Session, pp. 123–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Seaborg, G.T. (1981) Kennedy Khrushchev and the Test Ban, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Khalturin, V., T. Rautian, and P.G. Richards (1994), A study of small explosions and earthquakes during 1961–1989 near the Semipalatinsk test site, Kazakhstan, Technical Report to AFOSR, 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Båth, M. (1962) Seismic records of explosions — especially nuclear explosions: Part III, Forsvarets Forskningsanstalt (Swedish Defense Research Establishment), FOA report 4, A 4270-4721, December, pp. 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Agnew, H. (1987) personal communication to PGR.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bethe, H. (1962) Disarmament and Strategy, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 18, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  30. US Congress (1963) Joint Committeee on Atomic Energy, Hearings: Developments in Technical Capabilities for Detecting and Identifying Nuclear Weapons Tests, 88th Congress, 1st Session.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Foster, W. (1962) U.S. Congress, Disarmament Subcommittee Hearings: Renewed Geneva Negotiations, 87th Congress, 2nd Session, 25 July.

    Google Scholar 

  32. US Congress (1963) Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Hearings: Test Ban Negotiations and Disarmament, 88th Congress, 1st Session, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  33. US Congress (1962) Senate Armed Services Committee, Preparedness Investigation Subcommittee, Hearings: Arms Control and Disarment, 87th Congress, 2nd Session, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Teller, E. (1963) US Congress, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Hearings: Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, 88th Congress, 1st Session, p. 428.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Leet, D. (1962) The detection of underground explosions, Scientific American 206, 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brune, J., A. Espinosa, and J. Oliver (1963) Relative excitation of surface waves by earthquakes and underground explosions in the California-Nevada region, Journal of Geophysical Research 68, June 1, 3501–3513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liebermann, R.C., C.-Y. King, J.N. Brune, and P.W. Pomeroy (1966) Excitation of surface waves by the underground nuclear explosion Longshot, Journal of Geophysical Research 71, 4333–4339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liebermann, R.C., and P.W. Pomeroy (1967) Excitation of surface waves by events in Southern Algeria, Science 156, 1098–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lambert, D.G., and S.S. Alexander (1971) Relationship of body and surface wave magnitudes for small earthquakes and explosions, SDL Report 245, Teledyne Geotech, Alexandria, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sykes, L.R., J.F. Evernden, and I. Cifuentes (1983) Seismic methods for verifying nuclear test bans, in D.W. Hafemeister and D. Schroeer, Physics, Technology and the Nuclear Arms Race, AIP Conference Proceedings, no. 104, AIP, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richards, P.G., Zavales, J. (1996). Seismological Methods for Monitoring a CTBT: The Technical Issues Arising in Early Negotiations. In: Husebye, E.S., Dainty, A.M. (eds) Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. NATO ASI Series, vol 303. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0419-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4187-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0419-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics