Skip to main content

Formausedriskassessmentprocedures Fortheredevelopment of Contaminated Land

  • Conference paper
Contaminated Soil ’95

Part of the book series: Soil & Environment ((SOEN,volume 5))

  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

The application of risk assessment techniques to contaminated land problems in the UK has been very limited, partly due to the prescriptive approach described in guidelines 1 where, for many contaminants, reliance is placed on the judgement of professionals to set ‘action’ levels. Explicit consideration of either hazard testing methods or the nature of the hazard and its mobility or the variety of receptors, and their vulnerability, is absent from ICRCL guidelines. A broad strategy for risk assessment has been developed 2. There are two important components:

  1. (i)

    a rigorous approach to the ‘no-action’ option is adopted

  2. (ii)

    a tolerable level of assumed risk of 10-6 per year is identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ICRCL (1987) Guidelines on the assessment and redevelopment of contaminated land ICRCL 59/83 2nd Edition DoE, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ove Arup and Partners (1994) Contaminated Land Risk Assessment Procedures Internal Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Royal Society (1992) Risk: analysis, perception, management Royal Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O’Riordan, N J. and Milloy G J. (1994) Risk assessment for methane and other gases from the ground Funders Report CP/23. CIRIA London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. van den Berg R., Denneman C. AJ. Roels J.M. (1993) Risk assessment of contaminated soil: proposals for adjusted toxicologically based Dutch solid cleanup criteria. Contaminated Soil’ 93, pp 349–364, Kluwer Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. CCME (1993) Guidance manual on sampling, analysis and data management for contaminates sites (2 volumes). Report CCME EPC-NCS 62E. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. Winnipeg, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beckett (1993) Trigger Concentrations: More or Less? Land Contamination and Reclamation, Volume 1, No. 2, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferguson C.C and Denner J. (1994). Developing guideline (trigger) values for contaminants in soil: underlying risk analysis and management concepts. Land Contamination and Reclamation Volume 2, No. 3, pp 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

O’Riordan, N.J., Francescon, M. (1995). Formausedriskassessmentprocedures Fortheredevelopment of Contaminated Land. In: Van Den Brink, W.J., Bosman, R., Arendt, F. (eds) Contaminated Soil ’95. Soil & Environment, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0415-9_177

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0415-9_177

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3798-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0415-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics